Pamela Galli Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Lost the thread where I saw it, once upon a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspiria1488303077 Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I believe it is 400 length and 50 height. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TatianaDokuchic Varriale Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I used 750x50 but I've seen some that are up to 750x66 and I don't think that they got resized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerise Sorbet Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 The signature block on the new forum is capped to 64 pixels height, that is for text and images combined. You can put more in there but it will be hidden. Text size is a user setting here, so be careful when mixing text and images. The maximum visible width can vary too, column sizes can change a little with the user font choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porky Gorky Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I did tests on this when I made mine. Biggest Image I could get in was 800 x 70 pixels. So that's how big mine is. Whether or not everyone can see it all I know not. I can see it all and it hasn't been squished or re-sized, so I am happy enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TatianaDokuchic Varriale Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Porky Gorky wrote: I did tests on this when I made mine. Biggest Image I could get in was 800 x 70 pixels. So that's how big mine is. Whether or not everyone can see it all I know not. I can see it all so am happy enough. I see all of yours so I'm assuming that it was auto-resized instead of cropped because when you look at its properties on the post its 750x66. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porky Gorky Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Ah I see. 750 x 66 equals the same aspect ratio as 800 x 70 which is why I didn't notice any resizing I guess. Thanks for proving me wrong :smileytongue: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerise Sorbet Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Yes, too-wide images are shrunk when they hit the "max-width: 100%" limit, too-tall ones are clipped by the 64 pixel height of the enclosing div. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TatianaDokuchic Varriale Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Cerise Sorbet wrote: Yes, too-wide images are shrunk when they hit the "max-width: 100%" limit, too-tall ones are clipped by the 64 pixel height of the enclosing div. Makes sense. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kabalyero Kidd Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 I think a height of 60 pixels will fit without problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now