Reply
Penny Patton
Posts: 826
Registered: ‎05-31-2009

A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

[ Edited ]

Originally posted at the Digital Pasture.

This article is intended to illustrate the effects of camera placement on our engagement to, our ability to navigate and our freedom to create content within virtual worlds such as Second Life. I touched on much of this in "A Matter of Scale", but wanted to expand on the specific issues of camera placement in SL beyond the impact on scale, as well as explain how the camera placement settings in Second Life actually work.

A Matter of Perspective
The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.


"The video game industry spent a decade learning important lessons about how camera placement impacts our interaction with, and enjoyment of, virtual worlds -- lessons Linden Lab cannot afford to ignore." 


If you're in your late 20's or early 30's and have been playing video games since the 90's you probably recall what a hot issue camera placement was up until about 2005. In the early days of third person 3D video games how well the camera behaved was one of the primary concerns of most gamers. It could, quite literally, make or break a game. 

 From the time the first 3D gaming consoles arrived up until about 2005 every review of a third person video game made some mention of the camera placement and how it affected or hindered game-play as games came and went with varying degrees of success in dealing with the camera issue. 

 The video game industry takes the issue of camera placement very seriously, trying many approaches to the issue to see what worked and what didn't. In 2005 Capcom's "Resident Evil 4" hit the market with a new "over the shoulder" camera view that worked so well for third person videogames that it has become the industry standard. 

 

 

bionic_commando.jpg

dead-space-2-xbox-360-017.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why is the over the shoulder view so popular?


There's three primary reasons.
Environment Creation -  The camera is crucial to environment design. You can't have cramped, claustrophobic corridors or a small shed in the woods if the camera sits so high it will wind up on the wrong side of the walls or ceiling. Larger environments don't seem nearly as large and impressive. Everything needs to be upscaled for usability and aesthetic impact, which presents additional problems, such as the fact that it will become increasingly difficult to keep the on-screen characters in scale with the environment. 


Usability - The additional sense of "place" extends to a more intuitive sense of where your avatar is standing in relation to your surroundings, even when you may not be able to see your avatar's feet. This makes it easier to navigate your environment 

Many early third person games would centre the camera behind the character. The problem here was that it placed a "blind spot" directly where you most need to be able to see. Off-setting the camera to a shoulder view moved the blind spot out of the most critical viewing area.


Immersion - Placing the camera closer to eye level puts you, the player, into that world, rather than making you an outside observer watching from afar. It gives you more a sense of presence within the world.
 As you can imagine, all of this translates directly into a non-game 3D environment like SL, especially in the case of environment creation which is much more important directly to SL users, since the environments in SL are all user created.


Let's take a look at the camera placement in Second Life.


 Second Life has had the same camera placement since Linden Lab first opened the doors in 2003. The camera placement in SL is set very high above the avatar. Zoomed out far enough to see your whole avatar it sits approximately 2 metres over your avatar.

default_cam_b.jpg

 When you try to zoom in, the camera continues to rest at least half a metre over you, with only the very top of your head remaining visible on screen.

default_cam_in.jpg

Compare these screenshots to the video game screenshots above.


How does Second Life's camera placement affect environment creation, usability and immersion?


 Take that building to the right of my avatar in the screenshots above. The  criss-crossing roof supports sit at about 2.65m high. For a bit of perspective, the average ceiling in the average apartment/house sits lower at 2.45m high. I'm not even talking the roof itself, which peaks much higher.

Despite the high ceiling, this is what it looks like when I wander inside with SL's camera placement.

low_ceiling.jpg

The environment creation issues are apparent immediately. As we walk inside we find that the camera sits above the supports.  If the ceiling was solid instead of a phantom sculpt, it would push the camera down below the ceiling, but it would still be angled down, at the back of my head.


  By resting so far above the avatar, the SL camera pushes up minimum required ceiling height. Taller ceilings will make buildings and rooms look stretched, which encourages people to expand outwards to compensate. This contributes to SL's scale problems by pushing environments out of scale with avatars, which encourages people to make larger avatars, which in turn pushes the camera up further because the taller your avatar is the higher up the camera rests.

 
 This greatly reduces your freedom to create in SL, since you are then forced to compensate for the SL camera.  At least if you are designing an area open to the public, such as a shop, club or a role-play sim. Also, larger builds eat up more prims and more space, leaving you with fewer options for content and detail in your build.


 These same issues make it extremely difficult to navigate smaller environments in SL, contributing to tendencies to greatly over-scale environments in SL. You just need much more space to see your surroundings than you would with camera placement closer to eye level.


 You can also see from these screenshots how the view in SL is more removed from your avatar than the shown in the video game examples, reducing immersion and engagement. You are not inside the room with your avatar, you are watching a character on a screen from above.


Why should this matter to me? I'm always alt+camming around my environment anyways! 


 Chances are you're only using alt+cam to zip your camera around your environment when you're standing still. So as long as you're moving, camera placement is important. SL is not IMVU, your avatar isn't a static element in a 3D environment hopping between pre-set poses within a room, you can walk around, explore.


 If you want to explore a cave, wander the corridors of a dark spaceship, a dimly lit fallout shelter, or simply walk from one room to another in your own hosue in SL you are affected by this.


Is there any way to improve the camera placement in SL?


Yes, it's actually quite easy.


Some readers may recall that Torley Linden posted, some time ago, a video with instructions on how to adjust the camera placement in SL. Unfortunately Torley's video only covered half the process. There are actually two debug settings you need to change to properly adjust your camera placement in SL.


Here's a screenshot to help you visualize the settings.

camera and focus points.jpg

It helps to think of these two debug settings as tacks on a cork board with a string tied between them. "A" in the graphic above represents your "CameraOffset", this is the setting Torley mentions in the video.


"B" in the graphic represents your "FocusOffset", in simple terms this is the area in space where your camera is pointed.

 Let's take a look at what happens when you adjust "A", the Camera Offset, without adjusting "B", the Focus Offset.

camera and focus points B.jpg

 

With lowering "A", the Camera Offset, to eye level while leaving "B", the FocusOffset, where it was "A" is now below "B", meaning your camera is actually pointed at an upwards angle. Not much of an improvement now that your camera is looking up towards the sky. It allows you to more easily deal with lower ceilings, but disrupts your sense of  "place" in your environment.

 

So this is why we need  to also adjust "B", to keep the camera angled forward and down.

 camera and focus points C.jpg

 

Seeing is believing, here's a few comparison shots between the default SL camera placement and some custom settings I'll share in a moment. The default camera is on the left, my own settings on the right.

 camera_outdoors.jpg

In an open environment you don't run into too many difficulties, although you are more removed from your avatar, as if watching from above. The lower camera angle brings you into the world with your avatar. It's more like "being there".

camera_indoors.jpg

Inside is more of an issue, here I've even angled the camera down slightly so it's below the ceiling support beams, but what you can't see here is that this caused issues between my camera and the wall behind me. My camera continuously snapped from inside to outside the wall. I have no such issue with my own camera settings on the right. Also, you can see that it is much easier to judge where I am in the room in relation to the hay bales scattered about than it is with the default camera placement where my avatar is cut off above the waist. I don't even see the ceiling supports from an eye level view unless I angle my camera up!


Will altering my camera affect items with scripted camera controls? 


Not one bit.  Vehicles, camera positioning HUDs, chairs that take over your camera placement, will all work exactly as they did before.


What if I don't like the changes after I've made them? 


Simply look up the two debug settings you changed and click the "Reset to Defaults" button for each one. This will reset your camera to the original SL default placement, exactly as it was before you made any changes.


Alright, how do I change my camera placement?


This is simple, but I will need to go into a bit of detail because it is slightly different between 1.x viewers and Viewer 2.


 I am including in these directions the changes one needs to make to get either a centred view or a left shoulder offset. Most people prefer the right shoulder offset however some people who do not play many videogames have found the offset view difficult to adjust to and I've had at least one person ask me how to get a left shoulder view.


First you need to reveal the Advanced menu at the top of your screen. To do this simply press ctrl+alt+a and the menu will appear to the right of the Help menu in your menu bar. Viewer 2 users can also go to the Advanced tab in Preferences and select to have the Advanced menu shown.

step_1.jpg

 

From the Advanced menu select "Show Debug Settings", near the bottom.

step_2.jpg

The Debug Settings panel will appear. At the top of the Debug Settings panel is a field where you can type the name of the setting you'd like to adjust. 


 Viewer 2 users will want to type "CameraOffsetRearView".


 People using a 1.x viewer will instead type "CameraOffsetDefault".

 

step_3.jpg

The panel provides you with three integers to change for the x, y and z placement of your CameraOffset.  Change them to these settings;


x: -2.000

y: -0.400   ( Make positive for a right shoulder offset, leave as 0.000 for a centred view. )

 z: -0.200


 Once that is done click on the input field again and move to the next setting;


Viewer 2 users will type "FocusOffsetRearView".


People using 1.x viewers will type "FocusOffsetDefault".

step_4.jpg

Once more you will have x, y and z  positions, this time for the focus point. Change them to these settings;


x: 0.900

y: -0.700   ( Make positive for a right shoulder offset, leave as 0.000 for a centred view. )

 z: 0.200


Viewer 2 users will see their camera change as they enter each number, 1.x users may need to restart SL to see the changes to their camera take effect. 


 Enjoy your new perspective in Second Life! 


 I recommend visiting sims like Mont St. Michel, Doomed Ship, the Wastelands and the 1920's Berlin Project, all of which are vastly improved by better camera placement, to see just how different it can be when travelling through small corridors, underground tunnels and through 1=1 scale environments. 


 Here is a Jira requesting these changes be made in the official viewer.


 The nice thing is that with one of the Viewer 2 updates LL introduced camera placement presets. There is now a rear view, front view and a side/group view camera preset built into Viewer 2. This is why the Camera and Focus Offsets were renamed for Viewer 2. This means LL could easily add in more presets, such as creating a new default preset, while retaining the old camera placement as a "classic view" for residents unable to adjust to a new camera placement. They could also make the left shoulder offset and centred view as easily selectable presets one can choose from either the "Preferences" window or the "View" panel.


 Given the popularity of the "over the shoulder" view it seems guaranteed to help draw in and retain more new users and with how simple it is to implement it's a wonder they haven't already.

A Designer's View of Second Life
www.slguide.com
Willow Danube
Posts: 1,389
Registered: ‎06-13-2010

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

[ Edited ]

Reply to Penny Patton - view message

Thank you for this very valuable information. I will try this on as soon as I get back home tonight.

I have 2 questions...

Have you tried using this perspective for activities that requries percision like landing an aircraft on a spot, target shooting or aligning prims? 

Is there a visible difference if you are in Mouse look?  

Busy saving the world
Ceera Murakami
Posts: 2,678
Topics: 9
Registered: ‎02-25-2009

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Penny Patton - view message

That is an exceptionally nice article, Penny! I really hope that LL listens to your advice on this one, and your JIRA definitely gets my vote!

Personally, I don't care for the "offset left or right" view, as that screws with the perception of what is on the other side. To me, it feels like being partially blind on the side away from the camera, and I would prefer being centered behind the character. But your proposal offers multiple options, so that is cool.

I agree with one comment in the JIRA - it would be good to be able to record multiple presets, such as one for "preferred avatar view", and another for "Tiny Avatar", and another for "Quad avatar". Since the distortions used to make tinys and quads place the functional head height lower in the bounding box, I think a separate preset would be needed if you switch forms.

Also, one note: If you choose "Disable camera constraints", your camera doesn't get "forced down by solid object", or blocked from going below the surface of the terrain. As a builder, I usually have Disable Camera Constraints checked, because I need to look from below the terrain some times to adjust foundations or to locate a prim below the ground's surface.

Lilly Figgis
Posts: 106
Topics: 8
Blog Posts: 0
Registered: ‎06-20-2009

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Penny Patton - view message

Thank you for sharing it with us!

Penny Patton
Posts: 826
Registered: ‎05-31-2009

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Ceera Murakami - view message


Ceera Murakami wrote:

Also, one note: If you choose "Disable camera constraints", your camera doesn't get "forced down by solid object", or blocked from going below the surface of the terrain. As a builder, I usually have Disable Camera Constraints checked, because I need to look from below the terrain some times to adjust foundations or to locate a prim below the ground's surface.


 That's an interesting note, I wanted to test it myself before adding an addendum to the article because I'd never noticed it myself. I actually had camera restraints off for the screenshots I posted (I do a little bit of building now and then) so I reverted to the default camera and tested out a solid ceiling with restraints on and off.

I set up a ceiling at 2.5m high

 disabled1.jpg

And walked under it.

disabled2.jpg

 That's not mouselook, the camera is situatied above my head, pushed forward by the ceiling so the point where I can't see my own avatar at all.

 The things is, the above screenshots are from when I had camera restraints disabled. It was the exact same result either way. You also could not zoom out further than the wall, regardless of camera restraints being on or off. 

 Of course, this does not affect alt+camming, but speaking just of the camera in the default follower position it will snap to when you start moving.

 This was also just a test with regartds to camera behaviour around prims, as you say disabling restraints allows you to zoom out much further and move the camera under terrain, which is why I regularly have restraints disabled. There is also a camera "minimum" restraints which allows you to zoom into the avatar mesh or alt+cam inside a hollow object without the camera being forced out.  I know you can find that feature in TPVs like Phoenix, not sure where it is in the stock LL viewer, but it's a great and handy feature for builders and for adjusting attachments.

A Designer's View of Second Life
www.slguide.com
Penny Patton
Posts: 826
Registered: ‎05-31-2009

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Willow Danube - view message

@Ceera
 Also, and this would make a good addendum to the article, the reasonb the off-centred view is so popular is precisely because of the "blind spot" issue. When you centre the camera behind your avatar, you are moving that blind spot to the centre of your view.
 If you notice in the screenshots, you're not seeing the direct rear view of  my avatar or those videogame characters, due to the way the camera is angled, the central focus of both your camera and the direction your avatar/character are facing is the same.
 Say I want to walk up a thin ramp, only about as wide as my own avatar. I'd centre it in my view and press forward. My avatar, despite being offset, would walk up the ramp with no difficulties.
 If the camera is centred, I'm obscuring the ramp I'm trying to walk up with my own avatar.
That's the explanation, at least. I do fully understand that some people just cannot get used to the off-centred view, which is one reason why I think multiple options should be available to users.

Willow Danube wrote:

Thank you for this very valuable information. I will try this on as soon as I get back home tonight.

I have 2 questions...

Have you tried using this perspective for activities that requries percision like landing an aircraft on a spot, target shooting or aligning prims? 

Is there a visible difference if you are in Mouse look?  


1) Most vehicles already have their own scripted camera positions. I have found the "over the shoulder" view much better for precision avatar navigation than the standard SL camera placement. Every weapon I've seen in SL (which is admittedly not a lot) has required mouselook to fire, but I do know that the "over the shoulder" view is preferred by many for action games. "third person shooters" utilizing this view are extremely popular. "Dead Space", one of the games I use a screenshot of at the beginning of the article, actually requires a lot of precision shooting as you have to hit limbs and small targets rather than just blasting away.

2) There is no change in mouselook or scripted cameras.

A Designer's View of Second Life
www.slguide.com
Member
Caliburn Susanto
Posts: 140

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Penny Patton - view message

Penny Patton
Posts: 826
Registered: ‎05-31-2009

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Penny Patton - view message

I added this bit to the version on my blog, but already hit the character limit for my post here.

 

 Additional Camera Features
 
 I also wanted to mention some interesting camera features that many are aware of, but many are not. 
 
Are you aware that you can move your camera around with the mouse as you're avatar is moving? You can even steer your avatar this way for finer control of your avatar in navigating an environment!
 
 To make use of this feature simply move your mouse cursor over either your avatar or your avatar's name tag then press and hold the left mouse button.
 
 While holding the left mouse button down, move your mouse. You'll find your camera moves as you do, move the camera far enough to the left or right and your avatar will begin to turn in that direction. You can also angle the camera up or down in this way, even as you're walking.
 
 This has a bit of an interesting side effect on your movement controls. As long as you continue to hold the left mouse button down the keys that normally turn your avatar left/right will instead cause your avatar to "strafe" to the left or right just as they do when in mouselook!

A Designer's View of Second Life
www.slguide.com
Void Singer
Posts: 7,475
Registered: ‎05-28-2009

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Penny Patton - view message

there is another setting that may affect default camera pentration as well... can't remember the name of it... something like disable camera limits. it's the one that prevents zooming into an object normally at close range.

- Farewell to your ports and good luck to you all
April Looming
Posts: 267
Topics: 2
Blog Posts: 0
Registered: ‎10-05-2009

Re: A Matter of Perspective - The importance of camera placement in virtual environments.

Reply to Penny Patton - view message

I bookmarked this thread because it's just so COOL.  Offsetting the camera to the side seems to make navigating SL a little more difficult, at least for me.  So I went straight down, just so I could see the whole avie.

This seems to work best for me:

CameraOffsetRearView

X = -2.700

Y = 0.000

Z = 0.250

FocusOffsetRearView

X = 0.900

Y = 0.000

Z = 0.500

April Looming