Sassy Romano Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Thanks for the cross link, relevant in both places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 I don't know why anyone sells full perm, it's such a pain. (But I am glad they do.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catwise Yoshikawa Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Sassy Romano wrote: From the mesh upload quiz. The "correct answer being 1." This is actually wrong for all of the reasons stated in the thread, including the notecard in the box with NO prior offer such that the contract can be appropriately negotiated would render it unenforceable:- Darlene sells full permission mesh pillars, archways, and roof tops for other residents to use in their Second Life buildings. Darlene includes a notecard with the items. The notecard states that the items can only be re-sold as part of an original creation and are not to be re-sold as standalone items. Sally purchased the mesh objects from Darlene and wants to resell them. Sally can... Include the mesh objects in the prefab houses that she creates, then sell the houses. Sell the mesh objects as standalone items as long as she creates new packaging for them. The permission settings on the mesh objects are "full perms," she can do whatever she likes with them. Sell the mesh objects as standalone items as long as she renames each object. Ok, guess I'm lost in translation here, cause I understand that 1 is the right one and is because Darlene "includes a notecard with the items. The notecard states that the items can only be re-sold as part of an original creation and are not to be re-sold as standalone items. ". So, Sally have to do what notecard says. ^^? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hexem Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Catwise Yoshikawa wrote: Sassy Romano wrote: From the mesh upload quiz. The "correct answer being 1." This is actually wrong for all of the reasons stated in the thread, including the notecard in the box with NO prior offer such that the contract can be appropriately negotiated would render it unenforceable:- Darlene sells full permission mesh pillars, archways, and roof tops for other residents to use in their Second Life buildings. Darlene includes a notecard with the items. The notecard states that the items can only be re-sold as part of an original creation and are not to be re-sold as standalone items. Sally purchased the mesh objects from Darlene and wants to resell them. Sally can... Include the mesh objects in the prefab houses that she creates, then sell the houses. Sell the mesh objects as standalone items as long as she creates new packaging for them. The permission settings on the mesh objects are "full perms," she can do whatever she likes with them. Sell the mesh objects as standalone items as long as she renames each object. Ok, guess I'm lost in translation here, cause I understand that 1 is the right one and is because Darlene "includes a notecard with the items. The notecard states that the items can only be re-sold as part of an original creation and are not to be re-sold as standalone items. ". So, Sally have to do what notecard says. ^^? Number 1 is the correct answer in LL's quiz, but that's because LL is wrong. Sally only has to do what the notecard says if Darlene can show that Sally read it BEFORE the purchase. Otherwise, Darlene owes a refund (at the very least). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now