Alwin Alcott Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 The Loft,Garbaggio,Aria,Fashionably Dead,David Heather,Lamb.,Indented,Jian,Atomic,Madpea,.tsg.Exile,Second Spaces,Heels,Nikotin,Skin,Xin.,SPRING,Gacha,RARE,Skybox,hair,Dust bunny,Pixel Mode,Tarte,(FD) don't read below yet : guess for what marketplace item these keywords are.......................... here it comes...socks .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinRey Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 What??? They forgot to include Maitreya and Omega!!! :smileysurprised: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Just a friendly reminder that drastically cutting the capacity of the keyword box, among other things, would greatly help with this problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwin Alcott Posted June 17, 2016 Author Share Posted June 17, 2016 i was just looking for a skybox... got a few pages of those socks, boots and some other very related items, thats when i had a look at the keywords. Nearly all from the same shop. Flagged some of it and informed the seller. Might be not too happy i guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinRey Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 Alwin Alcott wrote: Nearly all from the same shop. Wow! Nearly 900 items in that store! That's the most massive single person keyword spam attack I've ever seen. It's going to be very interesting to see what LL does about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sassy Romano Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 it would depend on how many items were flagged to know whether an impact had been made. I favour a weighting system. There would be an "investigate this queue" which would be higher in the queue based on the number of residents flagging it. Second, based on the ratio of flagged items to the store owners sum of products, if that goes above a determined threshold, the whole store gets taken offline. it's inconceivable that all 900 would be flagged (same where the same product is listed in twenty colour variations but with keyword spamming) so based on averages, keyword spamming is good for business with little risk at present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinRey Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 Sassy Romano wrote: Second, based on the ratio of flagged items to the store owners sum of products, if that goes above a determined threshold, the whole store gets taken offline. Ummm, do you mean that's how it is or just the obvious: that's how it should have been? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 I flagged a couple, but doubt LL will notice the whole store needs to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sassy Romano Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 Whether it's obvious now or should have been from the beginning is a moot point. The point is that it's ripe for change and has been for a long time, the current situation is broken and incapable of supporting a growing marketplace with the way that it's (un)managed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwin Alcott Posted June 18, 2016 Author Share Posted June 18, 2016 first response from support : change your search words .... are you kidding? i used only "skybox" .... not sure i should laugh or cry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 Alwin Alcott wrote: first response from support : change your search words .... are you kidding? i used only "skybox" .... not sure i should laugh or cry What? Response to what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwin Alcott Posted June 18, 2016 Author Share Posted June 18, 2016 Pamela Galli wrote What? Response to what? ticket system MP/listing issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 Ah. Well maybe Dakota will see this and enlighten poor clueless support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinRey Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Pamela Galli wrote: Ah. Well maybe Dakota will see this and enlighten poor clueless support. We can always hope. She may even be able to explain why after almost a week Linden Lab still hasn't acted on Alwin's flaggings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwin Alcott Posted June 21, 2016 Author Share Posted June 21, 2016 the ticket i send in was closed after the first comment to change the search word... ( as said was only "skybox ") i reopened it because in my opinion that was a little too easy solved. Now is recommended to send in a abuse report..../me rolls eyes ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinRey Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Alwin Alcott wrote: Now is recommended to send in a abuse report..../me rolls eyes ..... You better send in an AR then. Just remember to mention in it that it was Linden Lab that told you to do so. Edit: Now here's an interesting thought. Imagine a dozen or more SL'ers flagging those gacha keywords spammers, opening support cases about them (and refusing to close the cases until the issue has been solved) and filing ARs. What would LL do if that happened? We may get an answer fairly soon. I'm not sure if anybody from LL has read this thread yet but they will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now