Jump to content

Dillon Levenque

Resident
  • Posts

    4,375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dillon Levenque

  1. 8 hours ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

    It is a Snow Owl - they are gorgeous creatures.

    Thank you! I can see that now; it's quite obvious once you really look at the shape and color pattern of the head, to say nothing of the shape of the eye, that what we're seeing is the RIGHT eye (because the owl turned its head to see what the camera noise was, probably). Rhonda seems to have gotten that straight off. I should have twigged to that from the eye's shape and slant; I just assumed it was the left eye of a bird looking forward. I was too busy looking at those powerful wings.

    Gorgeous is really not enough to describe that bird, is it? I wish I knew a better word.

    At least I was right about the raptor build; owls definitely be raptors.

     

    ps: I read an account once of an ornithologist, or possibly an aeronautics engineer, who'd purposely arranged things to attract an owl to stoop on him. It knocked him down! I don't recall the exact words, but the gist was that it felt as if someone had flung a bowling ball at his chest.

    • Like 4
  2. On ‎1‎/‎5‎/‎2018 at 3:08 PM, GoSpeed Racer said:

    This is amazing, the things you find when you go don the Youtube rabbit hole.  A melody based on a Rolling Stones song later used by the Verve in 1997 (Bittersweet Symphony)

     

    Cool. I thought that name was familiar and I was right, but when I saw it on the back of so many Rolling Stones albums he  had it as Andrew LOOG Oldham. He, of course, produced the original of this, as well as most of the  Stone's stuff in the 60's.

    • Like 1
  3. There is one area in which a great many written instructions fail. It happens on a regular basis in technologies subject to frequent and variable change (computers, for example). Second Life technology changes these days by leaps and bounds. Standard was the standard. For years. Then virtually overnight (yes I did that on purpose) it all blew up. Mesh. Standard sized mesh. Rigged mesh. Fitmesh. Did I get those in the right order? Often, a person writing instructions only goes "back" one generation. For someone who is starting five levels back they are pretty much useless. Now a creator can just shrug and say, "Tough. If you haven't kept up then you're somebody else's problem. I've got plenty of customers who pay attention to changing times." That's fine for SL. I didn't  have that luxury in RL. My  instructions were expected to work, period. For everybody.

    I settled on writing detailed instructions on how to get up to speed from the old levels, but I'd include that as a step. If it was Step 4, I would lead off by writing, "If you already know how to do/use this that and the other, skip to Step 5." That way even if they did decide they knew it all and skipped Step 4 they'd at least remember it was there in case they needed it. Worked pretty well. For SL, I think a person could probably just have a well organized list of links for Step 4: as in 'Go here to learn about such and such.'


     

    • Like 1
  4. On ‎12‎/‎21‎/‎2017 at 9:15 AM, LittleMe Jewell said:

    Today's B!tch - When the damn printer will not let you print a document in black ink only simply because one of your 'colors' is out. Stupid technology.

    Printer Hatred has got to be the most universal hatred of all who've ever had a job anywhere, I think. We've all seen this probably countless times but it still has appeal.

    Caution: If you are bothered by foul language, repeated over and over, turn off your speakers/unplug your ear buds or headphones first. I was never a big fan of Rap myself but I must say this one is completely appropriate for this particular scene. I doubt there's a one of us who doesn't feel that same urge.

     

    Merry Christmas, fellow idiots! :-)

    • Like 2
  5. 4 hours ago, AlecciaLin said:

    *Sets your shirt on fire and burns brightly with you as a group*

    Thanks! :)

    Perfect, Aleccia! That's the best way to deal with Maddy. The first time she set me on fire was at a big party and she was torching off pretty much all of us. She was buried up to her neck on a beach and as I got close she lit me up. I said, "Fine, I'll just sit down here next to you and we'll get toasty together", which I did (ignoring the shouts of "Sit on her head, Dillon!"). She went back to shooting fireballs at other people. :-)

    Oh and welcome to the Loony Bin Forum!

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2
  6. 7 hours ago, GoSpeed Racer said:

    The mods are away, time to post pony pics..... naw.....

    https://www.boredpanda.com/ugliest-christmas-sweaters/

     

    Number 1 got my vote simply for reminding me of Don 'No Soul' Simmons. And BTW if somehow you've not seen "Amazon Women on the Moon" you really should do that first chance you get. If you are a science fiction buff and groaned over those 50's movies with the 'rocket ship' crawling across the screen, clearly on a wire and with a sparkler out the kazoo, "Amazon Women" is absolutely required viewing. There WILL be a quiz.

     

    • Haha 1
  7. 20 hours ago, Clover Jinx said:

    "help I'm baked"

    I'm wasted.

    And I can't find my way home.

     

    Alternatively, if you're into the harder stuff,  there's always Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention:

    "Help, I'm a Rock."

    • Like 1
  8. On ‎9‎/‎26‎/‎2017 at 1:15 PM, cykarushb said:

    This was the closest we ever came to nuclear war

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident

    Sometimes I just don't pay attention the way I should. If I'd kept up with this thread properly I'd have seen this back in September. As it happens, this year I read about an incident that happened in October. October of 1962, right smack dab in the middle of the Cuban Missile Crisis which in and of itself is by far the closest I thought we got to a nuclear war. Truly, you had to have 'been there' (as in those times) to understand that. We lived with that *****. Every. Single. Day. Not just Cuba—the whole Cold War. Years. Decades, even. You can imagine how pleased I was to recently and suddenly be plunged back into that mode.

    Sorry. I digress. There was massive tension when the US learned (or publicly revealed we'd learned) that the Russians were deploying nuclear missiles in Cuba, 90 miles from the nearest American soil. We blockaded the island. A Soviet sub that was there before the isotopes hit the fan saw some American ships coming its way and submerged, per normal orders. It was spotted, either visually or otherwise, and the ships started trying to force it to the surface, using depth charges. What made this an issue is that the sub had one nuclear-tipped torpedo. Had it been used against an American ship it would be an obvious first strike. One man prevented that launch from happening.  He was a 34 year old officer on that sub: https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/03/you-and-almost-everyone-you-know-owe-your-life-to-this-man/

    So that's twice one a them Rooskies stopped Armageddon. Spasibo, tovarisches.

    • Like 5
  9. 5 hours ago, Madelaine McMasters said:

    3.5" floppy diskettes are nominally 3.3mm thick, or 1/7.69 inch. Your 1/8th of an inch is as close to correct as 1.44MB and 1TB, both of which are only loosely related to the actual amount of data you can store. A photograph of your imagined stack of diskettes might show as nothing but blue sky, as the aspect ratio of the stack (1.3miles/4 inches) would be greater than 20,000:1. Even on a super expensive 8K display (about 4K pixels tall), that stack would be 1/5 of a pixel wide. Because photographic proof of such a thing would be so difficult to create, I suggest arranging the diskettes as a 4" tall wall 42 miles long. That's about enough to prevent Tequila worms from Tijuana from slithering over the border into San Diego.

    Of course they could still tunnel.

    Cool; my 'eyeball' guess on the thickness was definitely close enough for a town this size. As for the 'nominal' data storage space, yeah. That depends on a bunch of other factors which is one reason I didn't worry too much about rounding. I should probably just call it "over a mile  high" which I think is quite probable no matter what.

    I do like the wall idea, but how 'bout if you put them in 6" high stacks, something that was not at all unusual, on a standard 30" x 72" folding table? I bet you'd have enough tables to show up on a photograph. Also, it would be way easier to make the 6" high stacks than the mile-high one. I imagine for that one you'd hear a whole lot of "God DAMN it!" over the radio link from the stackers, followed quickly by a rain of plastic. 

    • Like 2
  10. 20 hours ago, Grevan Snowdrop said:

    Actually, I am growing a feeling that you guys are just happy you found a new topic in the forums you can troll. 
    In the end it doesn't matter what Pax writes or how he does it. Tari Landar will only read the parts she feels like reading Skell Dagger will still
    be judging unimportant details up from his high horse (no ide who put him there) and the rest will have a giggle. 
    You people pretend to be some eloquent, upper class, elaborated inner circle, but in the end you are helping this discussion as much as the last row in class that will always do their own thing during presentation. 

    So, from here you got the choice to react in different ways: 
    You can be upset that I dared to point the finger at you guys. 
    You can shake your head in silence. 
    You can try to plug my comment apart. 
    Or you can reflect your manners and get a bit more serious. 

    Choose wisely.

    Darn, I missed this one; didn't see it 'til Tari quoted it. I'm disappointed; you came so close to getting Bingo and then fizzled out.

    You led with saying those who responded in the negative to Parx's point are trolls. That was such a strong start—hitting the standard bleat hard right from the get-go.

    You went on to accuse Tari of only reading the parts she wanted. You know this how? Because she only quoted certain posts or only parts of posts? Might have been because what she quoted was what she objected to, eh? Nobody put Skell on any horses, high or otherwise. Overlooking the fact he was one of the contributors to this thread who almost went out of his way to try to suggest other methods and directions to Parx and was far kinder than most of the responders, it's true we do tend to get a giggle out a lot of his posts. Because he's smart, eloquent, and funny. Simple.

    You then gave us the old "You're a clique!" cry. Again, a good solid standard bleat. In a way it's almost true; we meet some of the definitions of clique. The difference is this forum is an open circle and always has been. Newcomers are welcome.

    You then righteously pointed out that you dared—dared!—to point the finger at everyone. That took some major cojones right there. You may be hunted forever by FIC Death Squads (somewhere back in this thread someone was trying to figure out what to call our so-called privileged group: have we forgotten the FIC? How can this be?).

    But then, just when you'd put together a pretty good rant, hitting many if not all of the usual high spots, you biffed the landing. I'm pretty sure you might have been approaching a 10 on several cards if you'd just held form; I heard later even the Russian judge had you in the low nines. Too bad.

    You left out the FLOUNCE!

    ps: As for Parx: he seems like an all right guy. I think he overestimates the importance of his community to Second Life in general and I personally am getting really tired of the suggestion that residents not involved in combat sims/groups spend all their time in BDSM/RLV/Sex places (not so much from him, but from some of his fan club). As in any discussion conducted in mixed group, arguments FOR will succeed or fail on their merits, as seen by the group. Arguments AGAINST usually fall flat on their faces.

    • Like 1
  11. 6 hours ago, Clover Jinx said:

    For everyone needing some happy in there day!

     

    Must be a river otter; sea otters would probably not care for a fresh water bath. I'm lucky enough to live in a major sea otter habitat; they're common around here. They are relatively okay with  humans although they'll flip over and dive if a boat gets too close (their 'resting' position is floating on their backs on the surface, often while eating shellfish held on their chests). I did get close to a river otter once while floating down the South Fork of the Eel River up in the Coast Redwoods. It got to within a few feet of my little inflatable and then sort of porpoised alongside me (not coming clear out of the water, but surfacing for a bit then diving, all while staying right next to me) as I floated along with the mild current.

    One of those "Damn, I'm glad I did this!" moments, although to tell the truth the whole afternoon was like that.

     

    ETA: As fun as that was to see, I do hope whoever it is has a plan for getting the otter back in the wild (unless it was born and raised in human space).

     

    • Like 2
  12. 13 hours ago, Parhelion Palou said:

    Yes! It's much cheaper than the ones I used to see in Byte magazine. Those drives were about the same price but only had a 5 MB capacity. However, for $330 I could have matched the 12MB with a mere 66 180KB 5.25" floppies. In 1981 I was only paying $50 for 10 of them. Access time would have been significantly longer.

    A 4 TB internal drive is somewhere in the $100 - $150 range today, so one at $125 costs $0.00003125/MB. That's a bit of an improvement over the $249.58/MB cost of that 12 MB disk system.

    I'll see your 180KB 5.25" floppies and raise with 3.5" 1.44MB floppies (of which we all had stacks and stacks). When TB drives started getting to be the norm (especially in DVR systems), I did some math. These numbers are approximations only; I rounded both up and down quite a bit. The stack of 1.44MB's to equal 1TB of storage would be about 1.3 miles high.

    (I used .125" as the thickness of the 3.5's; I do still have a few of those around here somewhere but I don't have a micrometer nor calipers. Ask Maddy; I'm sure she has all that stuff. Or if you have enough, just see how many there are in one inch; you can eyeball that close enough with a ruler.)

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...