BilliJo Aldrin

the irony of all this is if the OP had put this in the right category to begin with I'd probably never have seen it and thus not made any attempt to ask for clarification of his invitation. the result of which was to be called a troll and told to move along.

Mr Harrison I've never attacked you. Disagreeing is not attacking or harassing. I'm merely attempting to engage in civil discourse. There is no rule that says I must stop replying to anyone posting in this forum, as long as its done in a courteous, respectful manner

I've gone back and reported all your abusive posts too Mr Harrison

You have proved our point better than we ever could. Thank you so much for your time and efforts.

I'm sure we can get half of your posts removed for being abusive if we wanted to.

......

no you read it and post exactly where it says what i'm asking about

exact section please that says discussing adult topics within the chat range of a child avatar is prohibited.

See what Mr Mckenzie has done . He's stated that adults must modify their action because his being there as a child takes priority over what anyone else is doing. Once again he proves that he believes that his RP takes precedence over anything anyone else might be doing. And he wonders why so many people want nothing to do with child avatars. All he needs to do is read his own words in this thread

no no, i'm asking is it against the TOS? I want you to cite the exact passage, I'm not taking your word for it. Because if it isn't against the TOS, i'm not going to say anything at all to you. You need to just walk away from us. I already said i won't engage you in any way. You are a man rping a kid, I will not rp with you as a child, I've already stated that

AR's for everyone

Mr Mckenzie a question for you. I'm standing on a public road on Zindra with my partner and we are discussing in local chat the detail our exploits with our latest lover the night before. You walk up, having gotten separated from your school group on its educational field trip of the Museum of Prims. Are me and my partner required by the LL TOS to stop talking about adult topics in the presence of your delicate 11 yr old ears?

Mr McKenzie, please stop putting words in my mouth and motives to those words. All I said was I will not rp to your child avi.

The thing is they aren't even kids, they are adults with kid avis. But, they expect us to rp with them, and treat them as kids. Mr McKenzie will be very disappointed if we ever meet inworld, because his rp isn't my rp.

OMFG I should have looked at your profile before. You are a kid. Sorry Harrison Nelson-McKenzie but you are not now, nor will you ever be welcome on my property, in fact I've already added you to the ban list.

I don't hate anyone. I'm done with you. I don't want any kids on my property. I will ban them on sight. End of discussion But if you see any good looking black guys, send em my way. *grins*

wrong wrong wrong. All I care about is avoiding being in a position where I can be ARed. I don't hate kids in RL, but I don't hang around RL kids either. If I hung around strange kids and engaged them in RL people would think I was a pedo or something. Quit trying to call everyone that chooses to not be around kids bigots. It does NOTHING to help your case. This all has nothing to do about bigotry and any kind of "ism", and everything to do with the idiotic sim ratings and the legitimate paranoia about kid avatars.

I wore the TMP free mesh body for a few weeks to see how I liked having a mesh body, then bought Maitreya Lara. I can't see ever changing.

Is it cheating if you show your partner the pictures afterwards?

Yes, I agree. I don't expect anyone to change in any way shape or form. Everyone should be exactly how they want to be. If a kid shows up on my property its because they want to be a kid. I don't say, hey you can stay if you change into an adult form. I just land ban them.

Oh I agree, better to be safe than sorry.

In my mind the biggest problem about kid avis is how short adults are unfairly banned from many sims due to their height. Kids sure, ban them, but to ban adults just because they fall below some arbitrary cut off height is kind of unfair. But once again it comes down to their sim their rules. I'm about 6 ft tall barefoot, but i'm tiny compared to the glamazons and hulks that seem to predominate SL. I was once told to leave a nude beach by some 9 ft tall freak because child avatars were not allowed. She had heard me call another avatar mom. I soon set her straight and she left me alone. But if she did kick me, i'd be like whatever. I've also been told to leave "human only" sims for wearing neko or bunny ears and tail. I just laugh and tp out.

Its funny, occasionally a friend of mine will show up on a new alt and say, oh its terrible, someone hacked my account and now its been perma banned from second life. I think uh huh, got caught diddling a kid didja?

Yes, but there are many "family friendly" nude beaches, but I bet even in those places there's kids trying to pick up adults, and old men who go just to look at the naked child avis.

I went to a Trans Siberian Orchestra concert in SL on the weekend, it was on some Christmas sim. A tiny kid showed up, profile said two years old. She just stood and watched the concert like anyone else. No biggy, we were all there for the same reason. Now if she had imed me and said I better wear panties because she could see my genitals up under my skirt, that would have been a problem. For her, not for me.