Jump to content

Sahfur Silvera

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About Sahfur Silvera

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Wow, after we mentioned the downsides and explained the problems with the group limit reduction they reconsidered, evaluated it and changed to a more reasonable and probably much healthier solution for the economy AND the players! It appears I was still right to consider Linden Lab the best developer all these years. Still ahead of the pack this many years in in freedom, transparency, adaptability. ^^ As far as things that might help the platform go, since my last post covered reasons why the group change would have been bad overall, lets speak of changes you are doing that will be unilaterally good and how I see making sure those changes go over the smoothest! It may seem off topic but my previous post touched on this and the real topic at hand is essentially grid health and decisions pertaining to it, isn't it?.. I believe that bake on mesh will be very healthy for the grid as it was suggested as a way to unite the mesh new and the system old/sl roots to promote cohesion as well as make it simpler for new users. One thing I must suggest though - make it somewhat easy for developers to continue supporting the applier systems in addition to system layers on their mesh with this change via some sort of scripting method to disable or enable it dynamically via script. I know this is easy to overlook and it might already exist in development. This will make sure the new system is actually used and reduce conflicts between the inter-medium of appliers and BoM. Make it so someone can script the bodies to swap between omega and BoM easily via scripts the developer adds in an update and it should encourage people to continue buying a wider variety of things instead of going into smaller holes economically speaking, perhaps? Just make sure the feature isn't too "static" or it might slow down adoption. I just came to give credit for what I see as listening to the players and possibly some more insight..
  2. Have you considered the harmful consequences that reduced group limit from the vast majority of users will have on various small businesses and therefore lead to reduced linden purchases for those stores due to less of the "group effect" on purchasing being taken into account, as well as the likely increased group join pricing (to prevent people from leaving VIP style groups) causing less exploration as far as VIP groups (therefore the increase not translating into linden purchases) etc which will effectively hurt the economy and on a much larger scale than premium can help it, causing a ripple effect. Almost anything that leads to stagnation of an aspect of an economy is bad for that economy. ....Or.... people leave their social groups for those groups instead and end up in a situation where the social aspect takes a hit which would also have a ripple effect that would in turn also hurt the economy. Also that would hurt premium due to perceived lower cost efficiency of the platform. Yes, it is partially conjecture but I find it more of a realistic outcome when I think about it than premium purchasing going up enough that it would offset the potentially hazardous effects that I have detailed here merely on the surface of the change. Did linden purchasing go up after the previous increase in group slots per capita?.. and do you expect it won't go down by the same amount with this change? This would be very important to know because this kind of change is like changing the shower head - it might direct the water away from your target and cause it to miss, reduce water pressure, etc... there are many options that do not lead to the intended outcome. What I am asking is do you have an economist on board that plays actively enough to predict this sort of thing and has taken it into account with proper math, facts and figures? I am not that economist.. I merely suggested animesh, bake on mesh, etc years and years earlier and suggested bake on mesh as a way to maintain backwards compatibility when mesh was first announced. Those things are recently being added while I saw the need for them a long, long time ago. (which is fine of course.. development takes time, just demonstrating that I do think about the health of this platform in at least a somewhat realistic way sometimes.) I have been wrong before (everyone has) but I am getting band-aid solution vibes from all of these changes. I am worried about a possible bottle-necking effect where the current beast has less breathing room for the economical or social aspects of its frame and ends up suffocating a little. While I myself realize alternatives to groups exist, expecting the vast majority of users to be set up with Flickr groups, Subscribe-O.. etc is unrealistic because most casual users operate merely with what they have in front of them. If people are using the groups currently, it would stand to reason that there is a purpose for their current use of those groups in many cases. I am all for the stability of the grid and am not entirely opposed to making sacrifices occasionally.. but I don't see this as an effective decision from my perspective and have seen MMO try this sort of route and choke themselves out before. Some of those MMO are now gone. Linden Labs is still the most fair and transparent developer and has cultivated a large world with more freedom than any other platform... but I fear you might be treading a beaten path here.
  3. I think the best thing someone could do is take this to the media and let them have a hayday and more or less have this game put under the radar for its own good. If they can put enough spotlights on the grid they could hopefully stop this from even being implemented. Its like cleaning a wound, it stings but it keeps it from becoming infected. Its underhanded but its both legal and best for the grid to use two irrational parties to produce a more rational result. So... get to writing and submitting this to anyone who can get it on tv and etc. It might get on there, they mostly seem to be grabbing for good news these days either way. Half the time the news is about things that happened years ago, ironically. Maybe they will get it to the soccer moms and they will band together enough to say no or at the very least watch what their children do online more (haha, thats a little joke: parents stopped knowing what they do a loooong time ago, they are mostly too busy watching tv and politics). Uniting the grids will divide the community further. I seem to see alot less people on the grid lately.. take a hint, shall we?
  4. Linden Labs and all whom it is important to: I must state this honestly. I will sound harsh but I am simply going to state the obvious and try to be as nice about having to explain it as I possibly can. All you want to do is "support" your income with a fresh new generation of young naive users- who will want to spend more linden. You want to expand the game to cater to a market that this game isn't even really that appealing to (they'd rather play WoW, mostly!) whilst cutting costs by getting rid of the teen grid. Sorry, but if you wanted to appeal to that audience you should have made a game designed to appeal to them in the first place. All you want is more money and you are willing to risk horrendous legal situations for yourselves and everyone on the main grid in doing so. What about people with adult profiles? Why should they have to change!? We have had it this way for a long time and we have lived longer. We are entitled to do as we have done! Are people supposed to sweep things under the rug and give up every hint of honesty this game has? You do realize you are alienating a large portion of your audience? The viewer is not a web browser, secondlife opinion does NOT always agree with these decisions and this grid is NOT designed for minors. I'm sorry but you can censor something as much as you want and it will still not change the underlying ideas of the whole. We were here first, we have built your grid for you, we have spent money into your company and we have the right to stay as we are. I have been honest that I am adult content. Instead of using an alt for adult content, I create content which supports the life blood of your grid on the same account. Many others do the same! We shouldn't have to change ourselves so some snot slinging brats can get on your grid and inevitably push the envelope as all of us did at that age. If they want to play, they can wait like some of us had to. What makes people so special that they deserve anything else? Are you denying that age has any factor in development or that a person at 16 and a person at 21 are different? I assure you there is a difference in drive, reasoning, experience.. must I name the plethora of things which change over years? Has the wisdom of the rulers all but drained away? Do you lack common sense about what can and WILL happen? Do you care? Do you plan to censor everyones IM to make sure nothing bad is happening? We don't want any! Would you like to push your values on us by doing this despite that we don't want it and that its a naive undertaking to begin with? We. Do. Not. Want. Any.
  • Create New...