Jump to content

Lyssa Greymoon

Resident
  • Posts

    1,802
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lyssa Greymoon

  1. 50 minutes ago, ChinRey said:

    I don't know if LL or any of the TPV developers collect such data but there's no way for anybody else to know. There's a lot of peer pressure going on here. Who wants to hear that "buy a better computer" snide remark? Even so, I've still had a lot of people telling me that their computers are struggling to cope with SL - not only regular users, Lindens and Moles too - but usually they only say that to people they really know and trust.

    What I'd like to know is what they're running and what they consider "struggling". I think from reading this thread there's a wide divide in people's expectations and standards. The computer I'm quite fine with running SL on clearly falls well below what others consider the minimum requirements.

  2. 1 hour ago, ChinRey said:

    I'm not surprised and it illustrates my point very well. Nobody's answered my question and I didn't really expect anybody too since it is a tough one. But right now SL is trying to be Sims Online and Blue Mars at the same time and the result is that it falls between two chairs. It can't go on like that in the long run.

    Knowing that SL's user base is using would make the question a lot easier to answer. I suspect there are a whole lot of users are running on non-gaming laptops.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, ChinRey said:

    For the tech savvyy people, here are the official system requirements. How realistic are those minimums? Linden Lab is misleading people and they fail to adress in a timely manner the issues that would have to be fixed if SL was to become what they try to sell it as. That is not good no matter how you look at it.

    It's a mess of nonsense. The minimum requirements won't even load SL properly under Windows 10, much less run it. The Intel GMA 945 won't run it under 8 either. The Radeon 9000 series won't run it on anything later than Vista.

    The Mac requirements are gibberish that amount to systems that never existed. I think someone just changed "G3" on the original SL requirements to "1.5 GHz Intel" then called it a day

  4. Also go to the Windows power settings and change the plugged in option to performance, then in your graphics controls set it to performance as well. It’ll either be in the system tray, or the pop-up window when you right click your desktop. Unfortunately this is the sort of performance you can expect out of a ten year old laptop. You may be able to upgrade the laptop’s CPU, depending on what’s in it now, and your comfort level of poking around inside an easily broken laptop. Replacing the hard drive with an SSD and a memory upgrade usually makes those old laptops a lot more usable too.

  5. No. 

    If you’re going to use a ten year old CPU, get the fastest one you can afford. They aren’t much more expensive than the slow ones. Don’t look at anything less than 3GHz. Personally I’d put the cut-off point at the Core i7-950. Nothing older, or slower.

    The entire GPU list should be ignored. The best of them can barely keep up with the better modern budget cards, and they’re obscenely power hungry. (If your need a computer that doubles as a space heater, go ahead and get a GTX2xx or 4xx). They’re all EOL, and haven’t gotten driver updates in years. An Nvidia GT 1030 or whatever AMD’s equivalent is will serve you better.

  6. With the end of Windows 7 support looming, I think this deserves another look and a bump since after January no one should be running Windows older than 10.

    The minimum requirements are a soup sandwich of junk that's not just slow, it's a mess of incompatible nonsense. First off there's ATI. Seriously? The only people who should be using ATI labeled cards are retro computing masochists. Driver support for the 9000 series ended with Vista. You can't install the latest drivers for any supported OS because they never existed. I'm pretty sure this means is Windows will install the standard VGA or basic video driver and SL won't run at all.

    Nvidia support for the 6000 series cards with Windows 8 (no 8.1 drivers), so once Windows 7 support ends, that's it. Current drivers for Windows still getting updates don't exist. SL is effectively incompatible with anything older than the 8000 series on Windows 10.

    I am convinced the Mac requirements were drawn up as a joke. Good thing you didn't spend any money on a Mac to test them because the requirements are a bunch of nonsense that doesn't even exist. I expect SL on the Mac will be history when Apple gets around to nerfing OpenGL.

    • Like 1
  7. In my experience, SL should be at least okay on anything more than the cheapest of laptops with the most patatoey of potato GPUs. They probably weren't hacking it in '09 either. If a Core i7 with a GPU meant to run 3D graphics is giving you 2fps staring at the floor, I'd suspect there's something else going wrong. Either it's throttling spectacularly badly or something is chewing up all the CPU cycles. (I'm looking at you, Microsoft antimalware agent). 

  8. 18 minutes ago, kiramanell said:

    Scylla posted about it already too; so, now it's my turn to be curious, and I'm really going to have to see what this 'AM Radio' thingy is all about. 😃

    Sadly, you're about ten years late. I think all that's left is The Far Away, which someone else has kept running.

    • Sad 2
×
×
  • Create New...