ChadUnfroyd

I have just started a Group called the Anti Social Network. Please don't bother asking to join, refusals can be offensive.

Sometimes you get what you deserve, sometimes you deserve what you get.

Derek Torvalar wrote: ChadUnfroyd wrote: Theresa Tennyson wrote: Radium Soup wrote: ParisEugene wrote: Maybe he was only faking it, he said at a party that he could see that some ip (Internet Protocol) were double. Is it possible that he was hacking us? He was 3 day old, did not rezz for anyone at the party. I reported him to Linden Labs. I will change my password (just in case). I'm curious to know the category under which you reported this person, simply because I don't recall any category titled "Revealing Public Information". And for everyone else wondering why their (sometimes) less frivolous reports are generally ignored, this guy multiplied by 1000 is likely the reason why. Disclosure Residents are entitled to a reasonable level of privacy with regard to their Second Life experience. Sharing personal information about your fellow Residents without their consent -- including gender, religion, age, marital status, race, sexual preference, alternate account names, and real-world location beyond what is provided by them in their Resident profile -- is not allowed. Remotely monitoring conversations in Second Life, posting conversation logs, or sharing conversation logs without the participants' consent are all prohibited. How about if you make up a pack of lies about someone. But some of them are actually true? What if you speculate about someone based on a promotional photo released by the Lab? You're OK as long as you just stick to commenting on the dogs. The four legged ones, that is.

Any one of several ex-girlfriends . . .

How do you feel about LL's soon-to-depart CEO opening his mouth and sticking his foot in it comment on his perception of Second Life? Are you thrilled that he has noticed your technical expertise? Disappointed because you are only an incomplete geek? Or maybe you consider it an egregious insult?

Prokofy Neva wrote: One wonders why such a grand thing wouldn't have lots more press though, leaked press if nothing else. Probably because the CEO is so dim that he says things like this, presumably while his PR spinmeister was still on leave coming down from his festive chemical romance: “We learned some positives but also a lot of ‘that’s not how you do it’ from Second Life,” said Altberg. “So we’re having a much more user-centric approach from the beginning, and try to make sure we stay away from the territory of complete geekdom.” Way to go on the alienation of existing users front, eh!

Gadget Portal wrote: I suspect someone got upset and reported one of the posts, which almost inevitably gets the whole thread deleted instead of the specifically reported post... All of the threads that have disappeared have a common characteristic: I have posted to them. Apparently there are two bots at work, one operated by a user which identifies my involvement and one operated by LL which automatically removes the whole thread. Watch this one disappear . . .

Theresa Tennyson wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: Never underestimate the power of frivolity. Or the durability of narcissism. With narcissism you can be sure at least one person really loves you. Jealous, TT?

I notice that "dancing against violence" is scheduled for 14 February this year - St Valentine's Day, how appropriate! Is there going to be an SL event? It must be working, because it has been going since 2013, and in those five years the number of victims has not increased.

Theresa Tennyson wrote: Radium Soup wrote: ParisEugene wrote: Maybe he was only faking it, he said at a party that he could see that some ip (Internet Protocol) were double. Is it possible that he was hacking us? He was 3 day old, did not rezz for anyone at the party. I reported him to Linden Labs. I will change my password (just in case). I'm curious to know the category under which you reported this person, simply because I don't recall any category titled "Revealing Public Information". And for everyone else wondering why their (sometimes) less frivolous reports are generally ignored, this guy multiplied by 1000 is likely the reason why. Disclosure Residents are entitled to a reasonable level of privacy with regard to their Second Life experience. Sharing personal information about your fellow Residents without their consent -- including gender, religion, age, marital status, race, sexual preference, alternate account names, and real-world location beyond what is provided by them in their Resident profile -- is not allowed. Remotely monitoring conversations in Second Life, posting conversation logs, or sharing conversation logs without the participants' consent are all prohibited. How about if you make up a pack of lies about someone. But some of them are actually true?

I thought discussion of competitors/alternatives to SL was proscribed in these forums. Except SL2 (or Nausear, or whatever silly name it currently has)

Just one. Think of it as another chorus of Auld Lang Syne, albeit belated. If you really want an old one try this: http://forums-archive.secondlife.com/108/37/90573/1.html Just to show that "plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose"

Forget the hippos. Stick to a chunk of manchego and a bottle of Rioja. Perhaps some quince for the girls with less sophisticated palates.

Coffee ice cream with a little Pedro Ximenez dessert wine dribbled over it.

I haven't read through the thread but I have been prompted by its title to say that I have a RL wife that I would be happy to offer the guy for free. Since he doesn't seem too choosy.