Jump to content

So Whimsy

Resident
  • Posts

    2,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by So Whimsy

  1. 1 hour ago, Eowyn Southmoor said:

    Some of you have this all wrong. Caith isn't the creator/seller of this item.

    She is a customer who bought the same item as the other people who have left negative views. She left a review herself to show future potential customers that the item still works as intended, and that the reviews claiming the item doesn't work are false.

    I was under the impression that she was just another costumer as opposed to the creator. Which makes it even worse imho. I as a creator would not want such a belingerent and aggressive review attacking other costumers in my review section. It's not helpful and only casts the wrong light on the product and its creator.

    • Like 3
  2. The problem here is that the rent and sale definitions have been made almost two decades ago within the world of second life and are well established.

    Swimming against the stream like the OP does opens them up to potential troubles with future renters because of miscommunication. They (the renters) are likely to feel they have made a purchase under false pretenses.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  3. I'd actually like a blacklist for stores. I have a small list of merchants I don't want to buy from, a blacklist feature would mean I could ditch the external list and not see those products at all. As a merchant I can block users, why not have it work the other way around, too?

    • Like 8
  4. 22 minutes ago, CaithLynnSayes said:

    If that seems like me being a toddler, then i can only be left confused.

    Not sure why I need to spell this out but no, that is not why I called you out for acting like a toddler. It's because of the way you wrote the review which goes from one personal attack to another. Wrongful reviews suck, as can anyone agree but responding in the way you did? Two wrongs do not make a right.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 3
  5. Blurr out the name of the reviewer as naming and shaming is against the rules.

    IMHO, *you* sound like a toddler rolling around the floor screaming in your aggressive and petty reply.

    • Like 7
  6. If you own land on mainland then you cannot purchase more prims unless you purchase more land to go with them.

    If you are renting the parcel from someone you should contact your land lord to inquire if its possible to get more prims.

  7. 42 minutes ago, Nick0678 said:
    Coughs.. just a reminder not everyone is a christian and interested in seeing trees with bulbs and papa smurf dressed folks, Belliseria isn't a "Christians only" land so keep that stuff a lil bit under control. Tyvm.

    Just a reminder that those who do not celebrate christmas do not need to partake in any of the festivities. Asking others not to do something because you don't like it is horrible.

    • Like 6
    • Haha 1
  8. 18 minutes ago, Qie Niangao said:

    I'm not seeing any restriction on redistributing full perm* the Experience-enabled version of AVsitter, and certainly for your own use you are free to copy any AVsitter scripts that perform auto-attach from one product to another. There's only the one script, [AV]object that goes in the to-be-attached object itself, that must have been compiled with the Experience in order for auto-attach to work.

    A product creator, on the other hand, may well want to have the paid-for version, for the support and to support further development. (I have a copy myself, although I don't create products for sale.)

    [ETA: This in-world viewer URI links to a sample "Donut Plate" object that, on touch, rezzes an auto-attaching donut; the plate itself is free, too, as a simple example of using the AVsitter Experience.]

     

    _____________________
    *It kinda must be distributed with both copy and transfer permissions, in order for it to be used inside props that are transferred to sitters on furniture that is itself transferred. I think there are "slam bit" tricks that a creator might use to give that prop more restrictive permissions once rezzed, but that's a very involved process and I don't recall seeing it being required for use of AVsitter.

    The creator of the script must be Code Violet or it won't work. They even say so on the GitHub page.

    Outlined here: https://avsitter.github.io/avsitter2_prop.html

    Experience Keys

    Second Life has now enabled ‘experiences’ which will allow automatic attachments (without need for any permission request).

    Important: The packaged version of AVsitter (inworld updates and marketplace) includes the [AV]object script compiled with the AVsitter experience by Code Violet. If you compiled [AV]object from GitHub yourself, this section doesn’t apply, as the script won’t have the experience enabled.

    For automatic attachments to work, Users will need to enable the experience ‘AVsitter’ (created by Code Violet) on their land. An experience may be enabled at the Estate or Parcel level by adding it to the ‘Allowed Experiences’ list. For an excellent explanation, see this video by Froukje Hoorenbeek. Be sure to choose the experience created by Code Violet as anyone could have accidentally created an experience with the same name.

    You can find out more about ‘experiences’ on the SL blog and in the SL scripting WIKI.

    Important: If users do not enable the ‘AVsitter’ by Code Violet experience then each
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...