Patrick032986

If, you say, so I am not to argue about it because I am right, and you are wrong have a good day.

I think Linden Lab needs to pay for our non copy items even, if they do a 2012 rollback my stuff will still be gone at this point I am not sure, if I should contact the creators that I bought the stuff from, and ask for a redelivered, or have Linden Lab pay for my stuff, and most of the stuff that was returned is non copy items meaning once they are returned it's gone forever.

Yes, there is, if it is related to something important business related that is.

That still doesn't stop people taking over the group founders should still have the rights to take back their group.

Well Cindy Evanier the whole part of this post that my Brother made was to get peoples opinions there is going to be agree, and disagree, so no drama intended at all.

Well because they were in a different crew, and we thought we could trust this crew, but we were wrong, and that's why the founder gave them ownership in the group in the first place.

Cindy Evanier let's back up, and think about this for a moment, if someone took over your group that you are a founder of, and, if you want to remove owners from your own group, and you can't than you would have to contact Linden Lab, if a founder had more rights be able to eject a owner from a group than that would put less strain on Linden Lab, and you don't have to wait around for Linden Lab to reply on the tickets just to get rid of some people in a group. I don't know how that would be drama in my opinion.

Phil Deakins, if we were the same person than we both would have the same ip address which we don't. So, no we are not the same person at all.

I agree to this, and I know what you are talking about. I think this would be awesome feature because it would help the founders to get their own group back, and ejected people that ownership rights. Founders should have the right to have more rights than owners do in my opinion. I think Linden Lab should be on top of this as, soon, as possible.

And, yes I am referring to the G rated sims.

I mean what about the changes to the adoption kid sims where apparently adults have there nipples showing under their shirts isn't that a little overboard?

I haven't heard much about that.

I would like to hear people's opinion on the new policies the Linden Labs put in place I want to hear what people think of it :) Thank you Patrick

Well it's not totally gone yet.

What about web hosting or vps?

This might be a odd question. But, is it illegal to sell hosting packages like an example VPN's aka Virtual Private Networks on second life? If, so how come I don't see very many of that stuff on second life?

I am liking everyones feedback really I do. Keep them coming please I am also a computer technician I have been for 10 years I am not a certified one but ... but I can tell you though that I got most of my knowledge from google. So yeah I really do love your guys feedback on this it's great to have people share their creativity and ideas .

Ayesha Askham wrote: Oh Cincia Server-side baking is a "done deal"? It is nowhere near that yet, though as you rightly say, it WILL happen, someday, no matter what SL residents might say. The code changes both in Viewer and Server are by no means all cut and dried, and given the recent inability of the programmers to even get basic server functions to work as expected, I am not holding my breath. As regards new viewers and "older" PCs there are almost as many variations on the basic PC theme as there are instruments out there. A PC is a consumable and it will not remain useable for ever. One of the major stumbling blocks in SL is the simple fact that a great many of the Residents of SL are not what was perceived as the type of person that would ever use SL, they are non-techy people who simply cannot or will not spend the money necessary to keep up with technical developments. It is a fundamental mismatch between the makers of SL and a great many of its most loyal and regular users. The makers cannot make a good SL that will run satisfactorily on "older" hardware and the folk that run, code and maintain SL simply do not comprehend those users' needs and a good many of them do not see why they should have to either. I am not sure that that issue is resolvable, it is one of the fundamental conundrums in SL. And please do not tell me that "SL looked perfectly good five years ago". It didn't. I know, and so do folk like Cincia, who have been around even longer than I. I completely agree with you their when I first started out with SL years ago I had a crappy PC that not stand up to the SL Viewer at all so I cancelled my account and never used it again then when I got a new PC I went back to it again but ... now since I have rl going and I met someone from SL and moved in with her I decided to back off on SL she is on it more then I am but anyways that's beside the point but yes I agree with you their Ayesha Askham

well ... we'll have to see what happens I suppose if this was my business which it's not I would worry about the users ... but what do I know ... right? I just wanted to hear peoples feedback on it and I can see no one is really worried at all ...

As this maybe true, what if someone can not afford the money for a new computer I am not saying me cause I can run the recent viewers just fine but what if in general someone does not have a powerful enough computer to run the recent viewers what are they gonna do then?

I personally would like peoples opinion on the server bake code I would love to hear people's feedback on this my opionion on this matter would be stupid on LL's part cause there is a lot people out there that are forced to use the older viewers cause their computers can't handle it and they are gonna lose users cause of this. So I would love to hear what you would think about this.

no that has to do with the group this situation was a bit different effect it had nothing to do with the group or login issues it had to do with nothing being clickable couldn't even close it I had to kill it then send a crash report to them and they blame it on the special characters in your display name.

I just come to realize that they have a serious bug retaining to firestorm being unreadable for the special characters in the display name or I was told now that makes me wonder how that can be possible cause I had a problem with everything not being clickable in my firestorm when I woke up a few mins ago.

well what I mean is that since the toolbar is bigger then usual the chats and notifications stick out too far and they said it's impossible to make it any lower then already is cause of the toolbar don't you think it looks bulky when the chats and notifications stick out a bit more then usual I mean then again it's just me I always use to it being so low to the right bottom corner I don't know I mean I can take a screenie and show you but I don't know.

Firestorm became more uglyier when they released FUI I personally think they should go back but that's just me who am I to complain though.