Is this example script wrong?

[Loki Eliot]

Trying to get my head around the requesting of the Experience Perms using the example script for llAgentInExperience. 

using...

 

default
   {
       touch_start(integer total_number)
       {
           if(llAgentInExperience(llDetectedKey(0)))
           {
               llOwnerSay(llDetectedName(0)+ " is not in my experience");
               llRequestExperiencePermissions(llDetectedKey(0), "");
           }
           else
           {
               llOwnerSay(llDetectedName(0)+ " is in my experience");
           }
       } 
   }

But is'nt this script written back to front?

should it not be ....

default
   {
       touch_start(integer total_number)
       {
           if(llAgentInExperience(llDetectedKey(0)))
           {
           llOwnerSay(llDetectedName(0)+ " is in my experience");
           }
           else 
          { 
          llOwnerSay(llDetectedName(0)+ " is not in my experience");
         llRequestExperiencePermissions(llDetectedKey(0), "");
    } 
  } 
}

[Gypsy Paz]

yes

[Dolphin Linden]

The llOwnerSay is reversed, but I think the intention of having the permission request when the agent is in the experience is that the script can expect that the permission request will succeed. You normally wouldn't want to do anything like that, you would just call llRequestExperiencePermissions and handle the events. This method is mostly useful to interrogate another agent rather than the one the script has permissions for. You might, for example, rez different objects from inventory based on the agent being in the experience or not.

 

{  ( total_number)  {    (llAgentInExperience((0)))    {


     

      
    }