Terms of Service - User Conduct - Section 6.1 (vi)

[Wooja]

"You agree that you will not: Post, display or transmit any Content or conduct or host any activity that is sexually explicit"

(My emphasis)

Did I miss a clarification that this does not apply to Zindra? Or is that an edge case?

Wooja...trustllnottoenforcethis

 

[Venus Petrov]

I suggest that Zindra is an edgy case (my emphasis).  :matte-motes-bored:

[Perrie Juran]

It does appear that 6.3(iv) allows for an exception:

(iv) Post, display or transmit any Content that is explicitly sexual, intensely violent or otherwise designated as Adult under our Maturity ratings, except as set forth in those ratings.

Also, the introduction to section 6 does read,

"You agree to abide by certain rules of conduct, including any applicable community standards for the portion of the Service you are using)...."   (My underlining)

However, as a stand alone statement it does prohibit such activity.

[Wooja]

---

Perrie Juran wrote:

It does appear that 6.3(iv) allows for an exception:

 

(iv) Post, display or transmit any Content that is explicitly sexual, intensely violent or otherwise designated as Adult under our

Maturity ratings

, except as set forth in those ratings.

Also, the introduction to section 6 does read,

"You agree to abide by certain rules of conduct, including any applicable community standards

for the portion of the Service

you are using)...."   (My underlining)

However, as a stand alone statement it does prohibit such activity.

---

Surely LL's ludicrously highly-paid inhouse legal counsel assiduously assisted by excessively expensive and experienced external commercial law practice consultants would not generate a ToS which was self-contradictory, ambiguous, incoherent, unclear and of questionable use if taken to litigation?

Or did they take guidance from the SL Answers community and just cut and paste a bunch of stuff they found by using Search?

Wooja...expectsomethingprofessionalornot

[Perrie Juran]

---

Wooja wrote:

---

Perrie Juran wrote:

It does appear that 6.3(iv) allows for an exception:

 

(iv) Post, display or transmit any Content that is explicitly sexual, intensely violent or otherwise designated as Adult under our

Maturity ratings

, except as set forth in those ratings.

Also, the introduction to section 6 does read,

"You agree to abide by certain rules of conduct, including any applicable community standards

for the portion of the Service

you are using)...."   (My underlining)

However, as a stand alone statement it does prohibit such activity.

---

Surely LL's ludicrously highly-paid inhouse legal counsel assiduously assisted by excessively expensive and experienced external commercial law practice consultants would not generate a ToS which was self-contradictory, ambiguous, incoherent, unclear and of questionable use if taken to litigation?

Or did they take guidance from the SL Answers community and just cut and paste a bunch of stuff they found by using Search?

Wooja...expectsomethingprofessionalornot

---

How do we know that they are highly-paid?

Maybe they rescued some new Law Grad from flipping burgers at McDonald's and hired him at a bargain.

Or maybe they did hire one of us self appointed legal experts from this Forum to write it.

Maybe it was even me!  Although that is not my style of writing.  I am not quite that confusing.