Wooja

MizzKittenzz wrote: I'm not sure if he has the documentation but I know he has a Masters in IT and Computer Engineering, he still stands by waiting on SSD's, he don't trust them currently. If he's like you the documentation is probably irrelevant. Wooja...reckonhecantreadeither

MizzKittenzz wrote: Ever heard of drones? Yes, I'm reading a post by one at this very moment. MizzKittenzz wrote: Or facial reconnection? Erm, no, I can't say that I have. Is it similar to osculation? Wooja...wasteanymoretimereadingthis**bleep**idontthinkso

I suggest that you edit your post to include swearing, sexual age-play, criticism of arbitrary disciplinary measures, rudeness to stupid people and a telephone number of a bar in Lucknow. Wooja...thinkthatwouldgetyouacommunicationfromamod

Are you sure it wasn't birds singing outside your window? Wooja..becarefulnottoignorethereallifesolution

My wife is a libertarian. She hoards shoes. Wooja...thinkanyoneneededsomanypairs

Sudoquai Wonder wrote: Bitcoins can be accepted without Problems in Secondlife. No they can't. Wooja...questionthemotivationofthisscammer

Madelaine McMasters wrote: Every time I see a puzzle under construction, I am soooo tempted to noodle with it. One extra piece can drive some people nuts. FIFY! Only the ones with limited imagination. The rest of us understand that thinking inside the (puzzle) box is a pathetic response to the open ended road to ultimate failure that is life. Very early in my adolescence I was challenged (I think Eric Berne was involved) to balance a pin on the edge of a bottle using a cork and four forks. It was obvious that the first thing you had to do was discard one of the forks. Not being able to sort the wheat from the chaff, and focus on relevancies distinguishes those who don't have the first clue from those of us who achieve. It applies as much to writing - using the most apropos combinations of words to spear your target - as physical life decisions, like selecting your next car, which most take more time and care over than in selecting a partner. Wooja...reallywasteyourtimetauntingthelessendowed

Bump. Wooja...thinkllmighthaveofferedsomethingbetterintwoyears

Siggy String wrote: Ye sure.... you realy have no clue how it works do you.... Connecting an account does not mean everybody can see it Now go back in to your trollhole :matte-motes-big-grin-wink: FB's record on user security and willingness to change access permissions to personal data would suggest that it is *you* that is naive and ignorant. Here's an old thread that is still pertinent. Wooja...trustfbfurtherthaninstagram

Is it only me that is laughing at the use of the word "blacklist" in the title of this thread? Wooja...sayitwasironicifyoudidn'tknowthecorrectmeaningoftheword

MizzKittenzz added this: Please don't reply back in my thread, unless you want to have a discussion like an adult and not childish name calling. Everyone else replied nicely with their opinions and how they feel. You? not so much. So who died and put you in charge here, after so little time, much of it spent whinging, explaining about your depressing personal circumstances, and demonstrating a capacity for ignorance that is unusual even in these forums. Wooja...wouldbuyyourbrainifyouweresellingitasitobviouslyhasneverbeenused

MizzKittenzz wrote: You need English 101 Wooja... I'm not humiliating myself by having a discussion, you're the only problem here.. Your ignorance is demonstrably profound - and your own English appalling, from review of your postings in these forums. Wooja...laughatsomeonesuggestingineedenglishclasses

MizzKittenzz wrote: The law don't apply to the web in this area. How wrong can you be! Well, that wrong. Wooja...keeppostingandhumiliateyourselfevenmore

Siggy String wrote: it is also possible to connect it to your normal RL FB account.... You would do that? Wooja...giveupyouranonymityforacouplemorelikes

You could both wear just your birthday suits. Wooja...makesureyoudoitintherightplacethough

In the UK you can refuse to serve anyone. As long as you don't explain why. Wooja...thinkabarmangivesreasons

Storm Clarence wrote: MizzKittenzz wrote: I definitely didn't join to launder money, but maybe I'm biased but I don't see how selling btc for lindens, and then converting them to usd is laundering... I haven't done so or even tried yet, but you'd think they wouldn't mind if you only do a little bit because it still drives traffic to here and to the game. To me Bitcoins doesn't match the true definition of "money laundering", it's a real currency just the same as lindens is a real currency, and both are earned... Go to your nearest Community College and take a few courses in economics. Start with eco101, you need it. Absolutely clueless! A couple of courses in Law might not go amiss, either. Wooja...rememberthathewhorepresentshimselfhasafoolforaclient

Facebook does not permit Second Life accounts. Wooja...thinkllwouldhaveworkedthatoutbynow

Qie Niangao wrote: Pamela Galli wrote: No one in SL should be forced to do business with someone they dont want to. Again, just stop using the Marketplace. Problem solved. So very many problems solved. Just try it for a few months. Second Life is infinitely more enoyable when one simply pretends Marketplace doesn't exist. What makes it easier is that a lot of the time you don't have to pretend. Wooja...thinkllwouldhavesortedsomethingsocriticaloutbynow

Perrie Juran wrote: I'm not even sure if God knows what LL is doing here. Nah, he's too busy working on the Android update to Heaven 2.01. Wooja...preferthehellappevenifitsstillinbeta

Madelaine McMasters wrote: "to Eden" is a way in, not out. Wooja...thinktheeaglesknewwhattheyweretalkingabout

Randall Ahren wrote: Every book has a soul I consider every one of my avatars as a book, not as a character or a pen picture, or an aggregation of impressions, but the whole deal, a story - and, like Google Books, you do not see all the pages in the book, just the occasional page giving an insight into what the book might be about. I know what's in the book, of course, but others may only speculate. Having said that, even I am unsure what's in the final chapter, as it has not been written yet, for any of them, despite what the LL authorities might think. Wooja...pleasenotclassifymeasagraphicnovelnorchicklit

Did you divorce your alt recently? Wooja...knowitsvirtualalimony

SidQuibley wrote: Hows about "slightly humouous to a certain clique but really rather spammy" ? As an aside, did you know that the OED has already announced the new version of the past tense of "rob" is going to be "Robbened"? Wooja...hangontothehopeofbeatingwigan

LaskyaClaren wrote: Wooja is partially facetious Partially? PARTIALLY? PARTIALLY! Wooja...thinkimdesolateatsuchafailuretocommunicateeffectively ETA Can you think of another fairly common word that, like "facetious" contains the five English vowels in order. No googling!