Jump to content

Aard Andel

Resident
  • Content Count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Aard Andel

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Ok, have it your way, I'm an idiot. I just feel sorry that you have completely missed the point.
  2. Okay, this seems to have run its course. I have been condemned by the holier-than-thou, the wowsers and bluestockings, which is about what I expected. To recap: I have no argument with LL's dictum that an avatar obviously made to look like a child should not appear in a sexual context. But It doesn't make any sense to me that I can safely roleplay an 18-year-old girl being raped by her father, but not a 17-year-old girl making tender love to her boyfriend; which is not, I repeat not, child pornography in any sense. It is also absurd that, as a verfified adult, I can be thrown out of an adult establishment for not meeting the owner's (not LL's) arbitrary height restriction. You can quote me all the absurd legalities you want, or in the case of one of you, make a personal attack on me based on my profile, but none of you has persuaded me that it is okay to allow depictions of incest, rape, bestiality, torture and death while banning "young love." This bud of love, by summer's ripening breath, May prove a beauteous flower when next we meet. Good night, good night! as sweet repose and rest Come to thy heart as that within my breast!
  3. Try reading from the beginning, it might help you.
  4. They've made a moral decision for you, whether you like it or not.
  5. So, I guess you will be leaving SL.
  6. Wow, nice ad hominem argument against me personally. Too bad it conflicts with your J. S. Mill quote. Now can we get back to the question?
  7. Moral decisions? Is that too much to ask?
  8. OK, I get the picture. Rape, torture, bestiality snuff, dolcett etc. are all okay until someone threatens to sue, then it's a business decision, not a moral one. Meanwhile, my 100-year-old grandma can be banned from an adult sim for having an avatar less than five feet two, eyes of blue, or banned from SL altogether if she mentions the dreaded word "sex." It all makes perfect sense.
  9. In other words, Peggy, it's ok with you if I RP an 18-year-old being raped by my father, or my transsexual grandmother, or the family dog, but I can't RP 16-year-old Juliet having a romantic affair with a 17-year-old Romeo. Way to go, lady, you're really defending us against vice, aren't you?
  10. The height thing is a crock, by the way. There is nothing inthe TOS to dictate how tall you have to be to get into an adult establishment, it's done by owners who are scared s***less of LL and impose it of their own account.
  11. in other words you're saying they have no morals, they are just playing the odds. But in my opinion those other things are way worse. Let's face it, teenagers are interested in sex just like the rest of us, it doesn't have to be exploitive.
  12. Isn't there something called a "hardware ban" that allows your computer to be indenfitied by other than IP address?
  13. Just curious ... why is LL so fixated on preventing (virtual) "age play" when it allows so many other (virtual) illegal activities, many of which are worse, e.g. rape, incest, bestiality, torture, snuff, etc.? Romeo and Juliet would be banned in SL.
×
×
  • Create New...