Hi all, i checked out all your posts in this thread. I know, my post didn't belong to the original question but to many statements in this thread.
I am a content creator and i wanted to give our customers many design-options and play-functions with our products. Therefore we minimized all non needed prims/meshes to their minimum value and set them to invisible. I thought this will set the rendering effort to a minimum. But i noticed, that i thought wrong. Invisible prims have 3-6 times higher complexity compared to visible prims.
I understand, that a prim with textures which contains alpha parts are complex to render.
But i think there should be a difference between textures with alpha parts and total invisible components especially when they are minimized.
So i had to reduce the number of possibilities in my products to reach an acceptable level of complexity.
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Avatar Rendering Complexity
in General Discussion Forum
Posted
Hi all, i checked out all your posts in this thread. I know, my post didn't belong to the original question but to many statements in this thread.
I am a content creator and i wanted to give our customers many design-options and play-functions with our products. Therefore we minimized all non needed prims/meshes to their minimum value and set them to invisible. I thought this will set the rendering effort to a minimum. But i noticed, that i thought wrong. Invisible prims have 3-6 times higher complexity compared to visible prims.
I understand, that a prim with textures which contains alpha parts are complex to render.
But i think there should be a difference between textures with alpha parts and total invisible components especially when they are minimized.
So i had to reduce the number of possibilities in my products to reach an acceptable level of complexity.
regards
Tawny