Jump to content

Mariru256

Resident
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mariru256

  1. 4 hours ago, Indy Melody said:

    I think I will stick to using this one for my alt: Titans - The Nuubie - Ivory

     

    Not anatomically correct and “developed” and neither male or female. Add a cute child a/o and some wings and works great for me. 

    I am going to buy this now  it's too cute.

     

  2. 4 hours ago, Indy Melody said:

    I guess my thoughts are if the word "slimefur" and such images are already associated with adult activities, then it should be clearly made as adult avatars if the OP does have the premissions from the creator of the art for use of the copyrighted art to be created as an avatar. Otherwise, it's use as a child avatar would most likely be sooner or later used in such adult activities. It's SL afterall.  And that then is the problem as I see it, it's potiential abusive usage if created as a 13 year old.

    Slimefur does Artwork however yes the nature of the site he is at but does not always mean its 100% unsafe.......

  3. 5 hours ago, Krystina Ferraris said:

    If she’s going to be fully clothed at all times, why is it so important for her to be anatomically correct and “developed”?

    She WILL be clothed all times I had no intention anything else "BUT" anantomy correct.

  4. 11 minutes ago, Marianne Little said:

    If I hold my hand over the head and look at the body, I would see it as an overweight 5-6 year old. But I can't say that I understand the anatomy of an anime fantasy cartoon character.

    When I looked up "seraphie" I saw more long-legged and skinny ones.

    I would avoid that word "developed". With more body fat, a small child get a more bumpy chest and all over more softness and roundness. So I would not react to an avatar like that in clothes.

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04/28/article-1017249-0111D21B00000578-892_468x562.jpg

    No danger to look at that link, I promise.

    It is not a cartoon this character is copyrighted by one indavidual and is based off no other thing. I wanted to make that clear as again i have stated it is a closed species owned by Slimefur.

  5. 4 minutes ago, Orwar said:

       I wasn't addressing you, as is evident by me quoting someone else. 

    ooohhh sorry i'm a bit sleepy just woke up and its 5:45am  atm. but seriously thank you for your input. I have already messaged the creator.

  6. 6 minutes ago, Orwar said:

       Throwing a tantrum because people aren't seeming outraged enough for you? Yikes.

    where do you find me outraged? I'm only reaching out to community of a question I've never had commissioned an avatar before so I only wanted it to look ananomoty correct....

  7. 6 hours ago, Marianne Little said:

    English isn't my #1 language and I am not sure what "underbelly puff area" is. Do you mean mons pubis?

    Child avatars, chibi avatar and amine avatars is a never ending discussion in SL. You should provide more context. What did they say in more detail? And who said it? Do they own or have manager rights over land? Did they mean that LL would flag your avatar, and you be banned by LL, or by land owners?

    People talk a lot of crap. If they own land, they can say "Yes, I would ban that avatar so it can't enter my land". They can't say what others will do.

    Child avatars is legal in SL. I would say there is no reason to ban her, but it confuses me that she should be 13 years old. As one who does not know about body standards for anime, I can't help but see that shape as much younger.

     

    6 hours ago, Marianne Little said:

    English isn't my #1 language and I am not sure what "underbelly puff area" is. Do you mean mons pubis?

    Child avatars, chibi avatar and amine avatars is a never ending discussion in SL. You should provide more context. What did they say in more detail? And who said it? Do they own or have manager rights over land? Did they mean that LL would flag your avatar, and you be banned by LL, or by land owners?

    People talk a lot of crap. If they own land, they can say "Yes, I would ban that avatar so it can't enter my land". They can't say what others will do.

    Child avatars is legal in SL. I would say there is no reason to ban her, but it confuses me that she should be 13 years old. As one who does not know about body standards for anime, I can't help but see that shape as much younger.

    they had land yes but its in terms they are friends and only looking out for me was all they stated i can be LL banned more over land based ban.

  8. 7 minutes ago, SynesthetiQ said:

    Firstly, I can't vouch for what you may or may not class as pompousness or what part of my postings constitute 5¢ words. As far as I know I use vocabulary and language appropriately.

    I certainly wasn't aware that these forums required a special subset of the English language be used for fear of being perceived as pompous. In any event if the words get a bit long for you and you have trouble understanding, there's always Google.

    Secondly, I guess repeated use of the word "creepy" may be used to convey censure if you're in middle school, maybe not so much for anyone over the age of 14 when discussing a topic of this nature. Also apparently Orwar was "confused" which sort of dilutes the credibility his opinion either way.

    Thirdly, while I agree "anatomically correct doesn't instantly tick the sexualization button", purposefully accentuating and emphasising the sexual characteristics of a 13 year old girl is probably a clue that "anatomical correctness"  isn't the main goal here.

    Fourthly, I'm not sure where I may have contravened the "rules of the forum", but if I have contravened them and am subsequently informed so by an Admin, I'll take that as a lesson learned. The question then I guess is, are you an Admin for this forum?

    Finally, I am aware of the saying you refer to, and I agree that my assumptions may have been invalid.

    However, given the nature of those assumptions, I'm quite happy to be labelled an "ass" if you're happy to be labelled within the group which invalidates those assumptions - a tricky sentence for you I know,  but I'm sure you can work it out 😀

    re: Third, Yes it was intended as ananomy correctness of the OC itself. Fourth: your just fine i understand they're may be negative posts and this is why I ask before having it done before it got done i mean itdoesnt hurt to ask for advice or attempting to get an answer if you are not 100% sure on the tos for it. You and everyone has been greatly helpfull i did message avatar maker theto remove that area of Sirocco.

  9. 5 hours ago, So Whimsy said:

    Having a thirteen year old avatar with developed adult parts is a big no no on so many levels. The creator who makes this avatar is clearly not comfortable doing so, and neither wold 99.9% of the SL userbase.

    Actually the avatar maker is not finished with it and had no issue with it but I will tell him to go withought it. I just wanted to know if it was okay or not obviously not.

  10. I've payed an avatar maker to build my OC into second life she is 13 but overly developed, the build has  underbelly puff area but she will have clothes Now i was told that regardless how she's made i was told that it would be flagged as ***** even though the area will not be shown. The under puff is integrated with the avatar as far as i understand by the avatar maker. She will have clothes and covered. Do I need to have this changed because he's still working on fixes. Now the thing is that with drapes and all how can she be flagged as ***** when she's just developed from my original character? I'd like some insight. Thank you.

    EDIT: Thank you for all your opinions I have decided not to have it on and hope this eases all of your concerns. and greatly appreciate all answers. Thank you. This can be now closed.

  11. How do i get linden labs to reinbiurse me for 2 charges ive done to paypal when i meant to make one through a visa i was trying to do visa from the 2nd but triggered my paypal instead. I am going to call the bank and tell them to not pay the 100.77 and the 100.01  transaction pieces from paypal cause i never wanted to charge from paypal. I want them to take back the cost of the two L incerments exactly back at the time of transaction. I'm going to call bank to "NOT" fork over the mony for those 2 incerments. cause i never wanted it to come through paypal.

  12. I also have done this yesterday, in proceesing stage right now. I do believe its a setting on her end most likely she cant even figure out what the problem is, she never had this happen to her before. I sent one in as well to help get communication faster and solve it faster.

×
×
  • Create New...