Jump to content

Scottie Chatterbox

Resident
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Scottie Chatterbox

    Looking for a clear desciption.

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted

    On 11/14/2017 at 3:21 PM, LittleMe Jewell said:

    IF that is the OP and her SL daughter in the second picture (the girl with the little bear strapped to her leg), then I'm a bit amused at the OP's stance on all of this, since that young girl barely has any clothing at all on.  That swimsuit bottom is most definitely a g-string and that top is covering nothing more than the nipples themselves.  The girl looks to be in her mid-teens and that type of swimsuit is definitely not something my daughter would have been allowed to wear before she turned 18.

    NO My Avatar was not in Either Picture they were posted to show you and others the type of things you allow when hiding behind the rules.

    Looking for a clear desciption.

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted

    On 11/15/2017 at 7:36 PM, Penny Patton said:

    To the op: Your friend who was banned for having a "young adult avatar and simply being in a sim with sex furniture", where they banned by LL or were they banned from the sim by the owner or group officer? Anyone can can you from their land for any reason or no reason, and as I stated above, plenty of landowners in SL are quick to pull that trigger for the most ridiculous reasons.

     

    Her Account was Banned by LL for "Age/play" I wouldn't have been upset if it was from someones land.

     

    On 11/15/2017 at 7:36 PM, Penny Patton said:

    Regarding the sim you reported, you used the word "infant" to describe some of the avatars so can I take it you mean obviously very young, child avatars? Infants, toddlers, pre-teens? If so, I believe LL would have issue with those appearing nude next to nude adults wearing or in proximity to sex toys (ie: actual toys, not depictions of genitalia) but as others have pointed out, nudity itself, without the context of sexuality, doesn't seem to be a problem for them. If you reported the sim and LL did not act, then I think you have your answer there.

     

    Yes I am talking about Avatars like look like a 1 year old all the way up to 12 or 13 years old. And no LL does not have any problems with it. They very much allow it and it is a very open gate for age/players to do what they want. As long as you keep it in IMs or at a privet house that is on a high level so no one can see LL allows the depiction of children is a sexual way. Out of sight, Linden Labs doesn't mind.

    Also no The girl with the sex toy on her hip wasn't a child avatar but she was standing next to them so it was against the ToS. It's ok you'll be glad to know nothing was done about it even after reporting her to both LL and the land owners.

    Looking for a clear desciption.

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted · Edited by Solo Linden
    Images in violation of Second Life forum policies.

    Just wanted to update you guys on this whole thing. This is what you are saying is allowed and totally ok with a sim that allows child avatars and nudity. Don't worry I filled a report to both LL and the staff, but the staff did nothing. The female has a sex toy attached to her leg and the man has a semi-erection on his attached genitalia.

     

     

     

     

    Looking for a clear desciption.

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted

    Just now, Cindy Evanier said:

    but if he just has it attached and it is not doing anything  ie erect or engaging in activity then what is the problem.  A man in rl has one at a nude beach.  It is part of his body.  I really can't see a problem with a male at a nude beach looking anatomically correct.  

    So how many children do you see walking around a nude beach in the USA??

    Looking for a clear desciption.

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted · Edited by Scottie Chatterbox

    A Male ***** in Second Life has scripts inside of it that are to be used in a sexual manner. Example to make it hard and ejaculate. That makes it a SCRIPTED SEXUAL OBJECT it is a Object that has scripts in side of it for the sole purpose of committing to sexual acts, Please tell me what you are not getting with this. The Terms of Service for the game of Second Life very explicitly states that no Avatar that is Depicting a Child can be anywhere near an Object that is scripted for sexual use. That is the whole argument here. And I would really like to hear what Linden Labs reasoning is for allowing it.

    Looking for a clear desciption.

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted · Edited by Scottie Chatterbox

    1 hour ago, Alwin Alcott said:

    Don't project your own sexual perverted thoughts on others, going to a nude beach is perfectly ok, ánd allowed in RL and SL.

    That you relate nudity to sex is your problem, not the visitors of the beach.

    Well thank you in Defending the age/players that go to these beaches to have sexual encounters with child avatars, and Linden Labs very blatant disregard of their own Terms of Service. Oh and No person under the age of 18 is allowed anywhere near a Nude beach in the United States of America so it should not be allowed in Second Life. And if you are going to point out Nudist colony's that are also breaking the law when there are Children present. If you are not allowed to be naked in front of a child in Real Life you should not be allowed in Second Life. It is just another example of Linden Labs not upholding their own rules and ToS equally to all.

    Looking for a clear desciption.

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted · Edited by Scottie Chatterbox

    Well I had a friend that was in a teen/ young adult Avatar and she got banned for simply being in a sim that had sex furniture. No sex was going on or anything yet Ban. Yet Golden Sun Family Beach has Adult and Child Avatars all nude with Scripted Sexual Objects (C*cks and attached v*ginas, some attached to Child Avatars.) Yet it has been allowed to opperate for roughly 5 years now. So why would my friend get banned when a whole sim is practically catering to *****? For clearification I will now copy and past word for word the LL ToS on *****. I added whats in brakets.

    Promoting or catering to such behavior or representations violates our Community Standards. For instance, the placement of avatars appearing to represent minors in proximity to "sex beds" or other sexualized graphics, objects(Attached C*cks, and V*ginas), or scripts would violate our Community Standards, as would the placement of sexualized "pose balls" or other content in areas depicting playgrounds or children's spaces.

    So yes as you see in bold it specifically says IN PROXIMITY TO. So a Nude beach allowing CHILD AVATARS is in clear violation of Linden Labs Terms of Service, yet Linden Labs does nothing about it what so ever. So any Avatar that looks like a Infant/Child next to an Avartar that looks like an adult and they are both NAKED they are in violation and thus should be banned. LL has even baned the word Age/play haha.

×
×
  • Create New...