Jump to content

Meep UwU

Resident
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Meep UwU

  1. 5 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:

    Which is within  the Donetsk region as shown on the map.  It's as if they sanctioned the state of Ohio in the US.  Akron is a city in Ohio.  The sanctions would apply to Akron.  

     

     

    4 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

    While only the blue area is rebel controlled, the entire region of Donetsk is the part I outlined in Red.  The blue and yellow parts of that outline are not 2 different regions.  Kramatorsk is part of Donetsk. Whether or not it is part of the rebel controlled area is not relevant to the sanctions.  The sanctions are against Donetsk.

    image.thumb.png.d7457630f50d3a97ddc6a3a46e211e5a.png

     

    Okay, so fine, it's within the borders of it, even though it's not part of LPR or DPR. We can agree and disagree at the same time on why this shouldn't be how they handle it. However, it could be an oversight by the US Government as a whole, not LL.

    The other issue is that they were not currently living there. They were living in Kyiv.

  2. 3 minutes ago, Sam1 Bellisserian said:

    That's not Linden Labs making that decision though. They still do have to follow US laws first and foremost no matter what.  

    The US law sanctions target Russia, not Ukraine. LPR and DPR have been hot spots for Russian funded separatists, thus why they are included, but I won't get in to the deep politics of this. If you read, the person they've incorrectly sent this e-mail to and suspended does not live in either of those regions, is not a part of DPR or LPR and is for all intents and purposes, most likely going to become a refugee as they've had to flee their home, which he said, was in Kyiv. 

    LL needs to thoroughly review who they're suspending. Taking away someone's income at a crucial moment when they may need it is devastating.

  3. 1 hour ago, Orwar said:

       There not being a man? The form of the exchange of power displayed not being objectionable to your personal interpretation and opinion? 

       I don't expect anyone 'in the scene' rationally expects everyone to understand everything, but you're very direct with your perspective and opinions which, frankly, doesn't come off as respectful or supporting. Now, this was only a picture for fun, among friends, but if it had been a genuine relationship you had assaulted with your invasive 'analysis' (although I still don't think it can be considered an analysis with the amount of projection you put into it), you could very well have hurt people's actual feelings (more so than you have through simply flaunting your intolerance and ignorance, and not just to the people in the picture).

       I neither expect or require you to understand it, but the way you threw your opinions at it, suggesting it needed to be 're-done' to suit you, that was simply put rude and disrespectful. 

    I'm just gonna chime in and say, other people's opinions don't matter. 

    The picture is fab, but even my opinion doesn't matter, haha. It's if you like it that truly matters. 

    Also, as a woman who gets pleasure from being an "ornament", I think the picture is very well done and the women all look like they are consensual adults who may be in a happy poly situation.

    I'm really tired of "feminists" telling me, a woman, that being submissive or enjoying the idea of being on a "chain" or "sister-wives" is wrong. Isn't feminism supposed to be women supporting women?

    It's 2020 and if a woman wants to be any if this, my god, if she's happy, let her.

    Even more so, it's Second Life! Let people safely explore.

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 2
×
×
  • Create New...