bucky Barkley
-
Posts
61 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Knowledge Base
Posts posted by bucky Barkley
-
-
Yep, great feedback Void, thanks! I do know that today's monster becomes a mere garden lizard in a couple of years
-
Yep, there is a level of planning for the future in it - today's overkill becomes a nice sweet spot in a year. I know I may start doing machinima as well.
-
[I'd posted this over at Kirsten's Viewer, but I want to reach a wider audience before I go order]
Hello, I am seeking to replace a 2006 Intel iMac. Obviously almost any desktop I buy these days is going to be an improvement. I am thinking of:
http://www.velocitymicro.com/wizard.php?iid=18
Although I would love to max out a new iMac, I am thinking that Windows 7, 64bit, is the way to go.
Some of the hardware specifics are:
1200 Watt Velocity Micro® Power Supply - Nvidia® SLI™ Certified (+$110.00)
EVGA X58 FTW3 motherboard with USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gb/s
Intel® Core™ i7 processor i7-960, quad 3.20GHz cores, 8MB Cache
6GB DDR3-1600MHz Triple Channel Premium Memory with Heat Spreader (3x2048) (+$35.00)
1536MB EVGA™ NVIDIA® GeForce GTX 580 GDDR5, PCI-E 2.0, SLI ready (+$450.00)
Genuine Microsoft® Windows® 7 Professional 64-bit w/ SP1 (+$80.00)Specific questions: what to avoid? what to zero in on? I know the machine will be decent for machinima, but the primary goal is to get the best photography features from SL.
-
[sorry if this is a repost - this part of the web site seemed to swallow the first one]
I want a machine, Windows or Mac, that can handle all SL graphics features on maximum, with a great frame rate...
What would you recommend?
I want to be able to take photos with depth of field, shadows, and blur. My 2006 iMac wont do these ...
[ An Update -- thanks for the nod towards BOXX -- I am a diehard Mac fan, but am unsure as to whether a high end iMac is going to handle every graphics feature turned on -- the next step up from that is to go Mac Pro... on the other hand.. for that money I can really max out a Windows machine and know that there is a large pool of people in the same boat -- it is safe to say I am targeting 2000-3500 for this, if need be.. I want rapid fire snapshots to disk at high res w/shadows, depth of field, etc.. everything turned on. Working with my 2006 iMac is like having a photographic arm tied behind my back.. I know what is possible ( Hello there, Zonja C!), but I cant do it on my machine. ]
-
[sorry if this is a repost - this part of the web site seemed to swallow the first one]
Which of the current crop of MacBook Pro or iMac machines will allow me to take full advantage of all available photo effects?
I want to be able to take photos with depth of field, shadows, and blur. My 2006 iMac wont do these ...
thanks!
[ Just to be clear - yes, I know where the system requirements are. I am coming up on 5 years in SL.... my SPECIFIC question is really aimed at those who are currently taking advantage of ALL available effects on an iMac or MacBook Pro. I want to hear about their experiences.]
Recommend decent nvidia laptop?
in General Discussion Forum
Posted
Am helping a friend upgrade from a very sluggish ATI based laptop (Packard Bell TJ 75). We are researching decent NVidia-based laptops - middle price range. What would you recommend for SL? Should be able to easily do shadows and most photo effects...