Jump to content

Red2Blaze

Resident
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I come to post the same thing I do understand that if something was not sold for a very long time, maybe its not all that useful, but having history of things is good I think for most Maybe in years to come someone will want to get something really old to show off and say "Back in the days" and that may become impossible I know for one we lost some stuff when XStreet closed and become Marketplace, a lot of items that never moved, and are now impossible to find, some of them real pices of art with prims alone, that when I personally got to see them I was always amazed by what someone was able to make back in the day, like a car that if I did not check it box by box I would have 100% be sure was mesh with its angels and all, and a viacle that was able to transform to many other types I really believe allowing people to dig into history is good, even if not that many want or will do it in a years time, and an option to find this stuff regardless of how popular it is, as a opt-in option in search will be great
  2. oww.. thanks, my bad there ^^ Even that its a shame you cant read any perm just because of the texture one...
  3. Hey, I am really not sure if I am doing something wrong, was trying to make a simple example script for setting and getting projector texture and for what ever reason it seems the "PRIM_PROJECTOR" (42) is not working or something? The code: changeLightTexture(string newTexture) { integer link = LINK_THIS; list perms = llGetLinkPrimitiveParams(link, [PRIM_PROJECTOR]); perms = llList2List (perms,1, -1); llOwnerSay ("perms = " + (string)perms); llSetLinkPrimitiveParamsFast(link, [PRIM_PROJECTOR, newTexture]+perms); } Any help to find out what's going on?
  4. I seen one of them pop on my sim, and as IM them they vanished then seen him on a sim I normally visit Glad to know its just a bot.. just wish there makers will mark them as such and not just leave them with no info on the profile that make it impossible to know why they show and vanish
  5. Thank you very much The snooping is mostly an example, just have to keep my name off record for now ? Was thinking about a VPN but honestly with the slow network I got I think it will make it all a bigger pain Thanks
  6. "groan" has been registered and moved along to the appropriate departments I don't think its that hard to do and to find a way to filter it even without looking for that spasficlly I think I may have been a little unclear on that part Its not that this case is the only reason I ask for this, its just the one that push me to go out and really look out if its all ready done before I go on opening a Jira asking for it The base reason is simply that I feel it simply should be secured compere to other work Linden Lab dose I assume over all that this is not that huge request and again this is not a breaking case, this is just a thing that I think should be there, over all I assume most of the SL residents as my self as well on that assume that the chat is simply secure, I mean I will not pass passwords or anything like that on it anyway, but I at least assume the basic of it being on even a small level secure And sure it may not be easy to get LL to do something about it, and hell how much can one even really expect them to do it, if they did not so far, but I can be optimistic anyway, so or so don't think it matters for you if they do it or not, for me it just be "nice to have" thing, so or so its not a world changer On any case Jira case opened: https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/BUG-225783
  7. ... wanted to make sure its not "fixed" yet before I do, there for this post Ya but for them to get my logs it means they need to get on my system first, something I assume is some what harder then simple sniff of the network I know there is always that one, but really? I did not say I am leaving or stop using SL because of this no did I call out a red alert to call out the troops Yet I think its legit to ask and be given a secure chat I am not holding my breath or stopping my (Second) life on this But I do think its worth the time to ask for it
  8. You do get I am talking about something that is existing and made up story right? I am fine with most jokes but this is all ready insulting This is not some mind control alien thing (that is completely a story made by Wakanda to distract us from there sinister aglets plan) but something that you can see if you take the time I am not going off Second Life because of it, but I do think they should put locks on the doors and not leave them open But if the security that looks for this sniffers are also made by China...
  9. Guess that mean my idea was close to what is there XD Honestly put this comment mostly to say LOVE that animation on the avatar picture ?
  10. Well I think this some what show it: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Official:Technical_overview_of_Second_Life_security From what I heard Linden Lab don't allow the sharing of IM messages with out both sides consent (beside where its necessary like in case of scams) as in for example I am not allowed to just copy an IM I had with someone and post it Yet they leave it open for anyone to sniff it I am sure someone else here can give better then me knowledge about it but from what I understand someone can always sniff the data, even if its secure, thing is if its secure with the the key they will have some hard time reading it, like you will have when trying to pass a door On the other hand when the door is simply open... its a lot easier for someone to get in Over all I think on the same network its easier to sniff but its not like no one cant sniff stuff also outside of of the area you are in, even on the internet on its way Over all I do think that most SL residents just assume that IM is secure, I did not even think that it will simply be open to read till I just by chance found that post and was honestly surprised It may be something small but I believe privacy should just be a thing even more when we talking about what I think is very little work and very little cost on there side to run it I personally do not understand how that related to what was quoted XD I guess I don't really mean completely out of my control, but in a way it is, as its in the end safe, nothing too bad can happen I think that cant be reversed in a virtual world
  11. Well sure then can try, but this is my main way to have internet now so stuck with it, and on any case il have that danger, but its better if what can be secure and should be secure will be secured I don't think they cant have your pixel sx, only your text in it So if you do it silently they cant hear it, and I don't think they can see it
  12. Not completely, its mostly about simply not wanting something that is suppose to be private to be unprivate Beside that its not the university I fear mmm... ya that is an option I was thinking about, but that means slow network on top of the slow network i got and that also means I need to pay every mouth....
  13. I am aware they can be more interested in that, and I don't fear that much that type of stuff, yet all the same I prefer it if SL will do what seem to be pretty logical and secure the chats from client to server And like I said my reason is that where I am at is a University, part of it is guys doing "Cyber" stuff... so I do find it likely they will be looking around just for the fun of it And if my name comes up there... I don't think its a huge work or anything on Linden side to do it, and I think its something that should be there what ever the case is, there is no real reason not to do it But beside that i mostly wonder if something changed from 2015 or not And from your message do I need to understand then that means nothing changed yet? I try to keep my RP realistic, as in what is possible in the frame of the world is possible in my RP, and can happen So at times sexting is out of my control Besides.... even with out sexting that is one reason for me, i honestly prefer my chats even more IM's to remain private
  14. Not from my understanding Point is Second Life sends are chats on the network as text, when we talk on here on the forums for example the little lock up in the address of the site area means that its secure so when its sent from my PC to the servers, and then to you, its all secured and encrypted so someone on my network cant really see it they see some mambo jambo they need to find a way to read making it really hard for them But when its sent as test anyone on the network can "grab it" from it and read it, as its not encrypted they don't have to do any work on it or anything they can just go out and read it (you can see someone showing that on the second page of the post I linked) Beside that I think it may even be possible for them to change the text messages so they can maybe even send stuff like we said them, or make it look like someone sent us something they did not but that is only a guess on my side of things
  15. So I found this post back from 2015: Seeing that now I am in a public internet area (study) I got some what scared on that, they have a study filed for "hacking" and stuff so I fear someone may be looking over the network, and make things a little akwared for me later on So wanted to ask if anyone knows if this was ever "fixed" or something, or is my IM and chat yet completely exposed to 3rd party's?
×
×
  • Create New...