Jump to content

Best Viewer?


Ricky40
 Share

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 4044 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...


Baloo Uriza wrote:

Bad form.  It's better to find an existing thread on the subject than it is to rehash all the same stuff again in a new thread.

With all the changes there have been we are talking about some extinct species in this thread.

 

So yes, this would need a lot of ketchup!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Baloo Uriza wrote:

See, maintaining the existing thread would still preserve how we got to where we are now.  I'm sorry you're too new to recognize the value, but such a practice of using the existing thread has only been around since the dawn of USENET.

Now that we've learned how to make fire, I guess it doesn't hurt for us to remember how cold we were before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


jjccc Coronet wrote:

if  you want to video in hd you need 120fps anything less is low quaulity. way to test this rotate the camera view arround your avitar if its jerky on the edge of the screen then 60 fps isnt ennough and you would want 120 fps instead

true if you got a slow video card

ideally what you want is (60fps or whatever rate) to synch with your monitor MHz perfectly. no matter how fast or slow the camera is moving . then can free up the cycles for other stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 4044 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...