LOOK - We have a New Spell Checker Thingie...

[KarenMichelle Lane]

Lookie here, the Old Spell Check has been replaced with the New Spell Check.

There is no ability to save the plethora of non-standard words related to SL vocabulary but otherwise Spell Check is back.

 

 

[Dillon Levenque]

Hmm. Let's see.Spellchecker test in progress.

 I've yet to meat a spellchecker that catches the mistakes I make all to often. Usually their limited too testing whether words have been spelled correctly, even if there the wrong choice for that particular context.

 

Yep, the usual. I don't usually switch meat for meet but as it happens I did while typing so I left it there. The to/too/(and even, embarrassingly enough, two) and the there/their/they're slips are practically my trademark. So thank you for pointing out the addition but sadly it's not going to help me as much as I'd like.

[KarenMichelle Lane]

---

Dillon Levenque wrote:

Hmm. Let's see.Spellchecker test in progress.

 I've yet to meat a spellchecker that catches the mistakes I make all to often. Usually their limited too testing whether words have been spelled correctly, even if there the wrong choice for that particular context.

 

Yep, the usual. I don't usually switch meat for meet but as it happens I did while typing so I left it there. The to/too/(and even, embarrassingly enough, two) and the there/their/they're slips are practically my trademark. So thank you for pointing out the addition but sadly it's not going to help me as much as I'd like.

---

Just for you ...

http://www.amazon.com/The-Elements-Style-Fourth-Edition/dp/020530902X

[Madelaine McMasters]

---

KarenMichelle Lane wrote:

---

Dillon Levenque wrote:

Hmm. Let's see.Spellchecker test in progress.

 I've yet to meat a spellchecker that catches the mistakes I make all to often. Usually their limited too testing whether words have been spelled correctly, even if there the wrong choice for that particular context.

 

Yep, the usual. I don't usually switch meat for meet but as it happens I did while typing so I left it there. The to/too/(and even, embarrassingly enough, two) and the there/their/they're slips are practically my trademark. So thank you for pointing out the addition but sadly it's not going to help me as much as I'd like.

---

Just for you ...

http://www.amazon.com/The-Elements-Style-Fourth-Edition/dp/020530902X

---

That's in my library, right next to...

http://www.amazon.com/Charlottes-Web-Trophy-Newbery-White/dp/0064400557

[CheriColette]

I noticed the spellcheck was gone so Im  happy another has arrived to replace it. 

Not that incorrect spelling worries me (in others posts)...as long as I understand the meaning, I dont care.

But for some reason I always leave off the R when writting 'your' and this doent ever get picked up in spell check..maybe because it more gramma than spelling, I dont know. 

[Dillon Levenque]

See, that's what makes it so irritating. I know which one is correct. It's just that my brain glazes over or something and I 'see' the right choice even though I actually typed the wrong one.

---

KarenMichelle Lane wrote:

---

Dillon Levenque wrote:

Hmm. Let's see.Spellchecker test in progress.

 I've yet to meat a spellchecker that catches the mistakes I make all to often. Usually their limited too testing whether words have been spelled correctly, even if there the wrong choice for that particular context.

 

Yep, the usual. I don't usually switch meat for meet but as it happens I did while typing so I left it there. The to/too/(and even, embarrassingly enough, two) and the there/their/they're slips are practically my trademark. So thank you for pointing out the addition but sadly it's not going to help me as much as I'd like.

---

Just for you ...

http://www.amazon.com/The-Elements-Style-Fourth-Edition/dp/020530902X

---