Fisk Zinnemann

The variety of content in Second Life often follows a very specific trend. The seasoned user knows that in any given category, there are a great number products of a quality that is mediocre, at best. Do a little searching, and one is likely to find a few developers with great potential, businesses worth keeping tabs on for the quality of the products they create. And if one is very, very lucky, one discovers a true gem: A developer that makes products of a quality so high, they don't seem to belong in Second Life at all, products so surreal that they stand out and draw every eye wherever they are used. Such content creators are few and far between, but are always worth remembering when found. I'd like to make known one such developer today: The Omega Concern. April Heaney founded T.O.C. in 2005, and the business at first created useful gadgets and modular combat aids, such as the Eye of Horus and the Omicron, one of the first multitools in Second Life. As she explored Second Life, she found herself disappointed with the popular combat systems on the grid for their limitations, sloppy execution, and run-and-gun style of gameplay. In 2007, she created the Omega Combat System, and perfected it over time to become the premier tactics-based combat system in Second Life. The Omega Combat System (O.C.S.): OCS encourages tactical gameplay by imposing real-world limits on players, such as fatigue, stance and movement-relevant weapon accuracy, and persistent usage-based mastery of various classes of weapons. It is one of the only combat systems on Second Life to limit jumping height and impose velocity based 'fall' damage on vehicles and infantry. It ensures that players can not spy on each other using an altcam by limiting visibility if the camera is moved too far from an avatar. Every OCS-certified weapon in Second Life features ammunition that is subject to wind deflection and ballistic drop. While infantry gameplay with the Omega Combat System is highly engaging, TOC's military vehicles are its most successful products. Painstakingly crafted with enormous attention to detail, they stand head and shoulders above the competition as Second Life's most feature-rich and realistic vehicles. All of them feature localized component damage/failure as a result of combat, which affects their operation. For example, damage to a tank's left track will make the vehicle turn to the left as it moves, and a helicopter with a broken tail rotor will spin out of control until the pilot cuts the turbine and begins an autorotation. Below are short descriptions and pictures of my personal favorites from the OCS collection: M1A2 Abrams with TUSK: Released in 2009, the OCS M1A2 Abrams MBT with Tank Urban Survival Kit allows full operation by a single driver, or with a crew of two, and comes with both NATO woodland and desert tan camouflage patterns. Its armaments, aimed and fired in mouselook, consist of a 120mm smoothbore main gun, a 7.62mm coaxial machine gun, and a mounted .50 heavy machine gun. The main gun utilizes a toggleable fire control computer that tracks the range to, elevation and heading of its target, then automatically calculates a ballistic firing solution, all in less than a second. The operator can choose from three different shell types: SABOT for use against armor, HEAT, which can be set to explode on impact or at a custom range, and a canister shell, turning the tank into a very nasty, heavily armored, 120mm shotgun. Its countermeasures are a smokescreen filled with radar-reflective particles that can cause guided OCS air-to-ground missiles to lose their lock.

Thanks for your prompt reply, Malibu - Only there's something very strange about my client's performance. A friend of mine runs a slower computer with less RAM and a 280GTX graphics card - a card much older and technically inferior to the one I'm running - only she manages to get 25-40FPS on the ground with even higher settings than mine - and in the same sim, too! She's not one to boast or exaggerate. If the problem isn't the hardware or my client, or the environment, where may the issue be?

Now this problem appears to span every single SL viewer, and I don't know why. Here's my OS and hardware: Windows 7 X64 Home Premium AMD Athlon II X4 630 @2.8 GHz 6GB Dual-channel DDR3 RAM @532MHz 1536MB Geforce GTX 580 Superclocked (EVGA) I think I've covered all the important parts. I can run Battlefield 3 on Ultra with 40FPS, Elder Scrolls: Skyrim on the highest settings with no discernable visual lag, and Crysis 2 on Ultra with the DX11 packs, and Ultra-high resolution textures, 30FPS easy. I run SL with deferred rendering and ambient occlusion enabled, as well as reflections, atmospheric shaders, etc.. Draw distance at 512. That said, I can be standing on a platform 4000m in the air, and I'd never get more than 20FPS. On the ground, I get something closer to 5FPS, unless I set my draw distance to 70. Which makes the game practically unplayable with any degree of enjoyment. Does anyone have the slightest idea why SL might be performing so poorly on my computer? Note: Prior to getting this graphics card, I was running an ATI HD5670, and the performance with that card was even worse. Before that, this hard drive had been on a computer that ran a Pentium 4 with a card from the late 90s, I believe. Total crap.