Lucinda Bulloch

Maybe you don't, but some do, if so then we could have an orbit that takes us near and far from these brown dwarfs as we orbit our own galactic center, this is only a discussion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRAS Don't talk, just read, your getting a free education, so don't spoil it.

Only on Tuesdays.

I have not mentioned a death star, but there is evidence that we are not part of the milky way but are in fact a small galaxy passing though, if true then we are passing though the milky way plane now, since IRAS we have discovered many brown dwarfs around us that seem to be part of the milky way and not us, this does give the probability of a collision or a pass close enough to affect the orbits of our planets, this is all new stuff.

So, you need a reply or was it so good you had to say it twice, not to sure on your ground now, lol.

Yes you are right the current theory is full of holes.

it is "embarrassing" dear not embaressing.

Why be extreme, now you are saying that if you can't work it out take the most silly one, lol.

It could be bank imposed exchange controls, if the bank if having trouble clearing funds abroad then the bank could be throttling back some of them.

So that all the meteor hunters out of business then, lol, still don't explain how you tell what is what, you think guessing is the best way, LOL.

Think this is the right time to add this. A lot of the impacts seems to have been done during in a short time. Also there are what appear to be old lava flows or mares this implies that once the moon was active once but something happened to it that caused it to be peppered badly then become in active. This could be explained by it leaving the orbit of a brown dwarf and entering an orbit around us, now 64 million years ago a spilt opened up in Russia, 100's of miles long and wide, it covered India in a mile layer of lava, the event was huge and poisoned the sea for 200,000 years, I know you think that a meteor did, that's cos the US didn't want Russia having the glory for the extinction event. No one can explain that event, it killed almost all life on the planet and for 100,000 years was covering most of Russia and all of India in lava. Again this can be explained by a very large body coming close to us and entering an orbit with us.

OK so for 4 billion years it has been inactive, agree? In that case the surface rocks scatted about can't be moon rocks can they, most of the rocks on its surface must be from somewhere else, as it is covered in impact sites it would seem that its has been scattered in rocks from all over, so implies how do you tell a moon rock from something that landed there, this fact is ignored so make one think that they know the so called moon samples are in fact earth samples and they don't have any sample of rock from the moon, because they cant go there and drill under the crust that is covered in rock from elsewhere they will never know.

ty for proving my point, as you all will do in time. PS why are all the heavy elements on or near the surface of the earth, lol, lol,.

They have never got a wave to penetrate the core, the only waves they did pick up implied it was gas so they ignored it, as for the centrifuge that was discussed on the Xmas lectures shown on the BBC showing that there is an argument for the core to be liquid iron, metallic hydrogen or gas, seems I am a lot more well read than you.

Well to prove that is a different matter, in fact there is very little that can be proved so making the theory described valid, it would be nice if it could be disproved without people resorting to insults, but there again maybe that is what it is all about, do you think I have been treated unfairly by some here, maybe they take any excuse, don't know.

Manners mean everything, clean them up and i will answer.

I don't believe in such silly things, leave that for kids.

So you are saying they didn't find water in moons rocks, then explain why they think there is water there, in fact they think water is on every planet and moon in some form, but they think mostly in the rock and that most planets with surface water have it in the form of ice, hence them thinking that ice is at the poles of the moon. LOL, I don't believe in god, LOL, far from it.

With respect but radiometric dating is flawed in many aspects. Water can leach Potassium in hours. PS I don't agree with the creationist or the evolutionist, I have my own thoughts on that subject, I may do a thread on that one later.

As you agree that rocks can be carbon dated, lol, i think that makes you very ignorant on the subject.

Do you have any proof that those rocks came from the moon. You can't carbon date rocks, only things that were living first can be carbon dated, that is basic 101, lol.

A scientist said a few weeks ago that the earth must have been covered in shallow sea and had less gravity when the dinosaurs were around, this caused a stir in the press, many could not get their heads around it. Well here is a theory that could explain that. If you look at the rocks you can see that the land either side of the pacific are the same as the are either side of the Atlantic and that the sea bed is new rock, this would mean that the the old crust of the planet was the whole old surface with the oceans covering that making most of the land shallow seas when the dinosaurs were around, and that what we see as the sea bed now is new rock made from a rapidly expanding earth, so how is it that the earth for billions of years is one size, then rapidly starts to expand to a degree that the new surface is many times the old surface. That is not hard to explain, it would have to mean that the moon was not there for those billions of years and has only arrived in the last few million years, well it arrived when the new rock appeared, so how ever old the oldest part of the sea bed is is when the moon turned up. How does it make the earth expand? Tidal forces, like the affects it has on the sea it also has on the rock but to a smaller degree, this would mean that each time the moon goes round it expands the earth by a few fractions of a mm. Were did all the new rock come from?, it didn't, this would mean the earth is hollow, and that void is getting bigger with every cycle of the moon. I think if you look at the depth that earthquake seismic waves bounce about in is the depth of rock and the center is gas, add that rock together and you get a planet size of this planet without the sea bed, in fact there are many little facts apart from the bone structures of dead dinosaurs that point to the earth being a lot smaller. How did the moon get there? Could have come from a passing brown dwarf, or put there so to expand the earth,lol. Do any of you have any thoughts on this. This added after a page of reply. The earth spins, we all agree on that. In any centrifuge no matter how fast it spins the lighter elements will be in the center and the heavy element out on the edge and if that spin rate is constant will create layers of density. This can be proved in any school lab, now apply that basic knowledge to the earth.

LOL, I knew it would not last long, just showing how destructive I can be, wont waste my time on the minnows here. I will go for the throats of those on top, I find the genghis khan way the best, kill them all then you are bound to get the right one, now as for your statement, you have DNA proof as to who these people are, because you are wrong, their DNA is pure white, not one Semitic drop of blood in them.

It is, I tried to isolate whether a hole in the magnetosphere could create sounds with the air at the bottom(top of atmosphere) and with the electro magnetic particles caught up in eddies at the top of the hole reacting with the solar wind, I thought that would be simple, but it seems none wanted to focus on that and wanted to focus on whether I am a worthy person or other outlandish things like making sounds in space and with bodies millions of miles away, as I am unable to express what I was looking for I have given up, I thought what I have said at the start would be seen for what it is as described above but this is not a chat to have with most of the people here.

The sun dont rise over ice, it rises over rock and that what it was measured against, but it seems only the people of greenland know that and think its odd that all these so called experts have ignored that and said ice. look at greenland and not places like Vienna that seem to have an axe to grind.