Jump to content

Trimmer Navarita

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About Trimmer Navarita

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi - I'm trying everything I can find in this and other forums to get the SpaceNavigator to work in Firestorm (or SL Viewer) and getting nothing - no response at all - the thing works perfectly well in Blender and other programs. SL clearly knows it's there as it shows up in the configuration. Just no response at all. Yes, my computer is plugged into the mains, Enable Joystick is ticked, I've tried defaults and 4 different suggested suite of settings, I've removed the driver, I've shut down and restarted everything on each occasion. I'm on a MAC with all software up to date. Any suggestions on
  2. I am having no joy whatsoever connecting my Space Mouse (wireless) to Second Life via either the SL viewer or the Firestorm viewer. I prefer to use Firestorm. The Properties panel recognises the SM and the SM works perfectly with other apps, like Blender ... but absolutely nothing with Second Life. Except that a couple of times it worked for no apparent reason; and, also that if I switch on Avatar as well as build and flycam the whole world spins out of control. This is really frustrating and I've spending months trying to get the damn thing to work ... any help would be much appreciated. Al
  3. Hi Whirly .. no, the land isn’t group owned but group members can have different levels of access within it. The alt has full access and there is no fixed landing point. I’ll check that ignore landing point thing ....
  4. Hi, this is not a new topic for many here because mostly the issue is a fixed landing point, that is not an issue here because there is not a fixed landing point on the parcel. My ALT is not the parcel owner (mainland), I am the parcel owner, but my ALT has full group rights and he's wearing the group tag. He has set Landmarks before in the parcel and they still work, but he tried today to TP with a new Landmark and got the error message 'Could not teleport closer to destination' ... He tried setting new Landmarks at different points but gets the same result ... also he is not too close t
  5. I have both Aesthetic and Signature Gianni .... the clothes for Aesthetic ft really well but they are limited in range ... getting better, but slowly. They really need to release their construction data to more builders, it's rather short-sighted of them to be, frankly, snooty about it. Gianni has a much better set of Alpha divisions than Aesthetic, much better and the basic skin from them is really nicely built. The shape is a bit round shouldered but that's a small point ... fitting of clothes is not as good as Aesthetic but it isn't too bad and as others suggest here, the volume of alpha s
  6. I have a Mainland parcel, A Landing point set and my Avi has no problem teleporting around the parcel. My ALT however, cannot teleport around the parcel; TP always takes him back to the Landing point. He can TP back home which takes him to a different part of the parcel from the Landing Point, but that's it so he has to fly everywhere. Is there a way round this? ... I've checked all his Land permisions in the Group etc
  7. The point is that they cannot make such a distinction clear in this medium; it is excrutiatingly difficult in cinema only managed by teams of people analysing each and every film to classify it. The only resource SL has capable of simply categorsing between under-18 and adult are the merchants and users; even that will be hugely variable depending on different world views. SL has entered a myre here and should get out as soon as they can by adopting recognised patterns of use in the web - the situation can be managed more subtly in-world.
  8. Having followed this thread since it began and read through the transcripts of the meetings it has become clear that this entire situation is a monumental waste of time; based on spurious notions of care and even more spurious notions of potential litigation. SL like several other organisations fall flat on their face when they divert from understood and accepted patterns of web use. The smart thing to do, that is understood on a global scale where 'adult' content may be found on a site, is to have an age verification page up front. I think it is perhaps SL's misplaced guilt about hosting adul
  9. Are John Norman's books on Gor age restricted in the US? Are any builders called Gordon being affected by the filter? In an under 18 search using the word 'Cum' you can by various sex rugs and a top hat.
  10. GOREAN is a dirty word so rings get MODERATEd, but a mostly naked woman fingering herself is GENERAL !?! I have a number of rings and a couple of kilts that have been 'allocated' a 'Moderate' label because within their keywords is the word 'Gorean', or 'Gor'. There is nothing in the product or the advertising of it that merits this. I'm sure it's easier for you to blanket cover all Gorean items as non-'General' but it is incorrect, misleadng and does not conform to your published guidelines. Following such a line will you make all bedroom furniture 'Moderate'? On a second point, now that you
  11. There seems to be no 'Reply' option now on the JIRA blog 'Future Projects and Features for the SL Marketplace' -- is this just me?
  • Create New...