Grizel Halberstadt

So we have a club sim, and are doing member only access but they are asking about if they can get guests in, the question is, can we do BOTH? Have group access and let people also (instead of) pay hourly access via land pass if they want to go week by week or have a guest? The way it's laid out it looks like we might be able to, but not sure.

Same here! My club "g-spot" is on Macando and we went fromt he high high 20's low 30's to 7 or 8, sometimes even 6. I mean come on! We are usually full with at least 20 people, sometimes 40 or more all the time. We seem to be 1/3 or less of our usuall traffic, this is killing our ads and stuff. COME ON!

Not to mention that with all the TPV's having thier own colors, and Phoenix being able to CHANGE your color to whatever you want... it's already a rainboz of colors over everyone's heads now, so a new color is useless, unless it's the color of he shade behind the text.

I think I'm the one that suggested a fee for chnaging names. BUT MY suggestion was a fee of $20USD to change USERNAMES instead and bypass this stupid display name thing entirely, and when you do it you lose your old name entirely thus deactivating all your contacts, but you retain your inventory, so if you are trying to escape from harrassers you can do so and not have to start a new alt (and all the stuff and clothes etc...) which is way more expensive than $20USD. Just refriend the people you wan to retain from your calling cards in your Inventory. (I could even see this working as possibly you creatiing the new desired alt, and then filing a inventory transfer form and pay the fee, that has to be approved by both accounts involved with a unique passcode via signing in on both accounts from the the SL website, thus the $20 fee for LL time to transfer Inventory - it maybe will take a week, but you get notice the move is complete, tada!) Sounds like LL has decied to take that idea (one that everyone I've told this to over the years has loved it) and cheapen it's effectiveness and adapt it for this display name thing instead. Sad. I think just letting people change the actual username is what people WANT, not putting on a passibly griefing facade. But then I think it shows that LL possibly isnt ABLE to change usernames meaning thier backend is shoddy.