Jump to content

Laurin Sorbet

Resident
  • Posts

    199
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Laurin Sorbet

  1. Oops, it looks like there is a little more work to do.
  2. I say, we must be kindred spirits although I'd make a few alterations concerning my ex. Our joyful bubble didn't last months, but when it was over I felt much the same way about the disproportionate arse. As well as his avatar's widespread, disproportionate arse. I will try not to get started on the horrible feet that looked like they needed attention from a livery stable rather than a pedicure technician. Come on guys, really? Lumpy hoof toes? Gross! Mesh feet do exist for men, you know. I'm sure he feels the same about me. Well, not about my feet. I doubt even he could bring himself to be bitter over the loveliness that is my feet.
  3. Dres, you can use whatever attachment point you like. I wouldn't put anything past an aberrant bad apple
  4. Not to worry. As we have seen, even in the case of written evidence facts are mis-remembered and mis-represented. Two more posts and it will be not only as though the statement was never made, but instead believed that I accused Raymond and Des of being read bed time stories by Jig. Oh wait, that might have really happened.... Paging Ms Connolly!
  5. To all of those letting their bloomers billow in the wind, I return the salute. FIC! Hooh-rah!
  6. Are you suggesting I'm prattling? Or rambling? I thought such accusations were considered gauche in the new and improved GD forum? I am sure I'm on topic as I read an exchange about the very thing a few pages back. Phil, if you aren't lying (even to yourself), then you might want to consider the concept of Occam's razor. If several people have stated they recall things differently than as implausible as it may seem to you, that is the most likely truth. And I don't lie, either. I have a wild imagination as has been exhibited many times in the old RA and on the current feeds, but I see no reason to lie about something that could be so easily contradicted with a quick search through the archives. You're right about one thing, the discussion is finished since you refuse to educate yourself and prefer to rely upon misguided instincts. My last suggestion is you recognize that aspect of yourself and try to take something from this when moving forward as unfortunately you are exhibiting precisely the same behavior in regards to Celestiall.
  7. HEY PHIL! Maybe you should go allllll the way back to page 24 and see what I wrote. Maybe that is too much effort. I'll help you. I wrote this: "You should probably then extend Celestiall the same courtesy, should you not? She has explained herself and as you say, "Only she can know the truth of it." To continue to question her reasons or her honesty beyond that seems less than gallant. To further clarify, this thread does however have its merits! I love a thread that is thoroughly derailed, makes very little sense and is full of false accusations and conspiracy theories, as well as the RA's own version of the Godwin, someone pointing a finger and shouting, "Clique!" Arriving in under 30 minutes and still piping hot, you guys are delivering." In the future try to remember this so you won't need to continue to tell me what I understand or am equipped to respond to when you can't even keep track of what is being said from one page to another let alone one year to another. Also, since the OP mentioned trolling and I am specifically dealing with you, then I am certainly on topic. Your senility routine seems to be an attempt to troll and since I wrote it and strongly feel it to be true, according to your logic it must be. ETA Oh yes, you got the threads closed because you were telling lies and people who actually knew what happened didn't agree with you.
  8. Phil, I'm not going to waste my day going back and forth with you over a subject about which you had two threads closed down. On that matter, suffice to say I don't believe you 'won' anything. I continue to disagree with you. I remember not only the event in question quite clearly, but also the events surrounding it. You keep assuming I didn't see what was going on but you are mistaken on that point as I was extremely active at that time. Apparently, you believe the same to be true of Love, who also remembers things the way I do. And if any part of your memory is at all intact, you ought to remember that Love was not a fan of Pep or myself. She has no reason to agree with either of us other than it being the truth. Supportive behind the scenes PMs aside, no one turned up who remembered things the way you said. Closing the threads silenced the dissent but the dissent remains. You're spot on about the nest. It is located in Area 52. Take a right at the wormhole, follow Alice past the technicolor mushrooms, and go through Stargate Coordinates 1 6 9 7 6 5. That will deposit you over the rainbow and directly into the heart of the nest. If you can learn the secret panty salute, you are in. I couldn't give a hoot about Trinity and who does or doesn't understand her. I don't mind ESLers in the forums and can usually get the gist of what they are saying, although some do ramble and their posts are difficult to understand. That is no different than some of the EFLers. What a total non-issue.
  9. PS Phil, maybe you did notice and you just forgot :-)
  10. Phil,since we can only go by what we read, as you stated, let me remind you of this. I recall you very recently posting that So and So herself explained the reason for 'the outbursts' so you were on safe ground in your reasoning. You appeared to believe none of the other history, comments, posts, behavior or nuance was relevant. She made a post explaining the reason for her comments and that should then be accepted as the final truth of the matter. Then you didn't want to talk about it or hear about it anymore, right? You should probably then extend Celestiall the same courtesy, should you not? She has explained herself and as you say, "Only she can know the truth of it." To continue to question her reasons or her honesty beyond that seems less than gallant. To further clarify, this thread does however have its merits! I love a thread that is thoroughly derailed, makes very little sense and is full of false accusations and conspiracy theories, as well as the RA's own version of the Godwin, someone pointing a finger and shouting, "Clique!" Arriving in under 30 minutes and still piping hot, you guys are delivering.
  11. That's fine with me if you want to get it locked, Phil. This thread is pointless as you are mistaken and I see you will not admit it to yourself. I remember you very well, also, and how tenacious you can be in arguing a pointless argument until a thread gets locked. I am going to have to disagree with you about what precisely set Rhonda off as neither of us were in her head, and neither of us can be sure. I do of course remember Amara leaving and was also saddened by it as were all the participants in the Undying. Whether it was that or the linebacker comment that provoked the explosion, who knows. It may have been Pep calling Bran chubby in FC chat or Elora saggy at every opportunity. Who cares. Everyone who frequented the Undying knew what Pep was like, yet no one else responed in such a manner. I understand that you have a great dislike for Pep and I think I also understand your reasons and that you are not alone in that regard. I would request that you also understand it is not a unified position about Pep and he does have friends. As one of those friends, and a fellow old forumite I can assure you he poked, he prodded and he annoyed, but he never wished harm on anyone. It's my guess that he didn't immediately deny it because the notion is absurd.
  12. Phil, let me be very clear, again. Pep DID NOT wish cancer on anyone, at any point. What he did do was reference Rhonda's post ad naseum and that is the only thing you can possibly be (mis)remembering. That is what actually happened after Rhonda's flipout.
  13. I think it'd be nice if more people became aware of the feeds. It is a bit of a closed circuit. I've found out about a lot of interesting places and products thanks to my fellow feed denizens. Medhu? I'm glad you realized who Cait is and she realized who you are. What I can't figure out is the need for taking a pic of Cait taking a wee. As a bystander, I'm amused by both pics. More posting please (both of you).
  14. I've been out of this particular loop for quite some time. I left during the AR wars. Pity the Friday thread concept has been demolished. Actually, the best Friday threads were the ones that didn't start out that way at all, but happened to be posted close enough to a Friday to let havoc break loose.
  15. I expect if anyone gets a spanking over this little incident it'll be me.:matte-motes-oh-rly:
  16. She was at work for god's sake. Don't disparage naughty librarians.
  17. (Venus, I expect you will be a good sport about this so...) Mayalily, if it makes you feel any better, shortly after Venus visitied your house yesterday I ran into her on the grid, purely by chance. Her name kept popping up onscreen but I couldn't spot her in the public area. I used my cam/minimap to locate her and got a nice up close and personal look. And a photo. As far as I know she had no idea. I've made a specific point of setting my viewer to hide where I am looking and/or that I am taking photos. This can happen anywhere, anytime, to anyone. I usually notify people I am taking snapshots but given the nature of this thread...oh, maybe that won't make you feel better. Nevermind. Loved the outfit though, Venus :-)
  18. Nevermind, dear, it is all starting to make a little more sense.
  19. Yeah Storm, and running on a Delled Alienware. Seriously though, Maylilya, if you don't consider the question too personal...?
  20. Mayalily, if I may be so bold, what is your rezz date?
  21. I'm glad somebody told Mayalilly about the underwear cam gawking. As a matter of fact, a certain Victorian gentleman *cough* that I know has his camera set for optimal upskirt viewing as his personal default.
×
×
  • Create New...