Baeric Constantine

Eternus.Soulstar wrote: dont add yet one more to the bajillion threads about emerald being maybe the antichrist of viewers I love this one hahha

The world consists of a diversity of people and viewpoints... some based in reality others not... some may be seen to be spam or flaming... but often if there is an offence, that offence lies within the person taking the offence. You posted the rules about abusing the moderation process... it all hinges on what abuse means... I personally have posted a thread asking where other threads have gone, because I did not understand and it was explained... yet this was not an abuse. The same with flaming spamming abusing etc... some people speak the minds, some people are diplomatic, some are lurkers and just read... The world consists of many people... we also need to be tolerant, open to others, as we can be inciting flaming too... i.e. swapping railing for railing. Thus, if you think you are being flamed... dont continue with it, report it... let Linden Research decide it. We are responsible for our own actions - well maybe all

meh... the image button is not even active for me...

SLink Hole?

And who would that be? Remember you have only posted the first time today...

Its like asking how to deal with the ghosting avatar issue too....

If points could translate as ten linden per point.... would it make a difference? hehe

I would suggest that as it is a TOS and CS violation here, that it could extend to that site too, but it depends on the approach. It is likely best to write the admin of that site, showing how the posting up of IM's are in breach of SL TOS and CS, quoting relevant sections with references, and try to align it with that site's TOS and thereby creating a bridging precedent with site and get it removed, as well as mentioning it is an intrusion into your personal life. Caveat: This is not legal advice, nor am I anyone's solicitor and have written from memory, and should be examined for yourselves. It should not be held that this information will be valid in a court of law. If legal counsel is required, please seek a practicing licensed solicitor in the relevant jurisdiction that is able to deal with raised queries or issues.

And when the issue occurs using any viewer above 1.22?

I see why that is annoying... Is it that one skin? Or is it the shape? Or a combination that renders them incompatible with each other?

Cinnamon.Lohner wrote: I made the mistake of looking inside my head once and found it empty. Not unusal for a redhead. Hey... I am redhead too

Cinn, that looks like the neck is a little long... kinda like some clothing wont go all the way down (shirts) so one has to put underpants on to hide the rest... so perhaps try lowering the neck a little see if it makes a difference?

Dang it Cinn, I been looking but cannot find, and I was sure Kwant dealt with something similar but it seems I was wrong, but it pertains to alpha channels not displaying correctly or not functioning correctly. I have been looking now half hour or more and cannot find the forum entry to reference it for you. Message was edited by: Baeric.Constantine - I looked more, but guess it was not Kwant, but someone else... Using textures on sculpts getting rid of the 'transparent' effect Alpha Problem - Any Ideas??? Other than these I do not know. Message was edited by: Baeric.Constantine - Quick question... Did you try upgrading your graphics card drivers?

You are most welcome. I am glad that has been resolved for you.

This sounds like Emerald Viewer is being used. If this is the case, then turn off the bounce feature in preferences and see if this makes a difference.

The issue is that the server still thinks you are logged in as the session did not terminate cleanly. What everyone has written is correct, however a solution that works for me is as follows: Continue to log in until you are logged in irrespective of received messages or warnings Once logged in teleport to the place you were last located when you logged out Teleport away Log out and Log in That should resolve the problem - it has for me each time I have this situation.

Alternatively, just say hello to each person that clears it too... but the question I would ask is why unmute if they are muted?

Alternatively, it is all gone, as happened to someone I know.

Personally I say, AR that person for harassment.

" I really dont mean to be a jerk..." says it all... doesnt it. You are one... but of course this not real, it is not happening, so you should not really take offence then should you? No, I thought not. So no need to respond further. As of course, its not serious is it?

This comment again shows a lack of understanding and comprehension and I would suggest that you take part in such behaviour. Your response indicates that you undermine how people feel... and that you ignore that some actions can take place without having to accept a yes or no dialogue box. It amounts to harrassment including rape where a person so feels that has taken place, whether or not an actual act has taken place or not. If this comment upsets you, please re-read your own... as of course nothing occurred here at all according to your comment.

Such a response shows only your character... as one person said to me recently: A person's nature is shown how they are in the light and their character is how they are in the dark. You, sir, are obviously living in the dark.

The comments that belittle how a person feels, reacts in a given situation is doing exactly wht you claim the author of this forum is doing. It shows a complete lack of understanding of the entire seriousness of this issue and it is not less than that of the world away from secondlife. The fact it is a virtual reality does not in any way decry from the serious of what took place. It would show as much that perhaps there is a partaking in similar behaviour? Now, dont get annoyed, because as you said it is not actually taking place is it? My recommendations is that you withhold from making comment until you gain a deeper understanding of the entire issue.