Jump to content

Dresden Ceriano

Advisor
  • Posts

    5,201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dresden Ceriano

  1. Have you given any thought to her seeing you as being a bit too forward?  Perhaps offering her friendship well before such social norms have been met was enough to throw up red flags in her mind.  Perhaps you went even further than that and don't realize even how objectionably such actions can sometimes affect people.

    Maybe she just had a feeling, by the way you'd behaved, that you might show up at her home uninvited and banned you as a precaution.  This isn't something I'd be prone to do, but it's quite understandable for someone who is... and they need not consider Second Life as seriously as you seem to indicate.

    Your proclamation that, "someone else banned" you from visiting their parcel is quite telling.  Could it be that you honestly have no idea how obnoxiously repulsive you really are, within the social structure of SL?

    Maybe, you just haven't realized that making friends in SL requires much, much more than simply sending a friend request as you would on Facebook or some other superficial, social media site.  For most people here, developing a rapport is a simple prerequisite to establishing friendship... similarly to real life.  Do yourself a favor... remember that the next time you send someone a friend request in SL and make sure that you've established a rapport with them first, as you would anyone with whom you'd intend to start a friendly relationship in RL.

    ...Dres


  2. DejaHo wrote:


    Dresden Ceriano wrote:


    DejaHo wrote:

    I froth daily

    For some strange reason, I believe this proclamation should made into a bumper sticker.

    ...Dres

    Don't tease me with illusions of grandeur.  I am very happy with my smiley face. 

    Oh, give me a break... your grandeur was established a long time ago.  It ain't my fault stupid people don't get it.

    ...Dres


  3. Richtea57 wrote:

    Absolutely no need to apolgise, I took them in the spirit they were offered. My reply may have given the impression I was offended, but I wasn't in the slightest, my reply was meant to imply that I'm a **bleep**....but I'm not a frothing one.

    Relax, no problem here.
    :)

    Pardon me... I sometimes find it difficult to differentiate between those who are clutching their pearls and those who are simply readjusting their scrotum for comfort.

    ...Dres


  4. LlazarusLlong wrote:


    Dresden Ceriano wrote:

     

      I'm rather drunk.


    I'd rather guessed that!

    [still celebrating Mardis Gras, I presume.]

    Wait... Mardi Gras is over?

    ...Dres *has been watching far too many TV shows and movies filmed where he lives, which always deplict the most festive of activities, regardless of whether they're real or not*


  5. Richtea57 wrote:

    I'm neither frothing nor a....well I'm not frothing, anyway.

    I sincerely apologize for my ill-conceived words... I do believe they were meant as a term of endearment, but also, I understand how you or anyone else might interpret them differently.  I honestly meant no disrespect.

    ...Dres


  6. Pamela Galli wrote:

    But with this house, a shame not to see it with AL on.

    As far as I'm concerned, it's a shame not to see anything in SL without AL enabled.  I understand those who haven't the graphic power in order to leave it perpetually turned on and know that SL can be just as fascinating without it.  But, the way I see it, I've been there, done that and now that I have the ability to see things with AL enabled, I never want to have to see them the way I use to have to.  So, yeah, I keep AL enabled all of the time.

    ...Dres

    P.S.  I answered your survey and take issue with the quality of your ill-informed, badly stated line of questioning.  Perhaps you're too ignorant to understand that... Oh wait, I think I've confused you with one of those imbeciles who've established surveys here wherein they ask us to reveal personal, albeit, statistical information and/or are too damn ignorant of the culture of SL in order to know how to ask the right questions.  You know what I mean... the lazy b!tches.

    In other words, never mind.


  7. Venus Petrov wrote:

    So, did you pee..in the sea?

    Doesn't everyone?

    I once knew someone who couldn't help but take a dump while swimming in the sea and, upon returning, told me to be careful should I ever find it necessary to do so because "toads flirt".  This is the same person who once told me to be mindful not to step in this particular "pud muddle".

    ...Dres  (I'm sure you get the gist.)


  8. LlazarusLlong wrote:


    Dresden Ceriano wrote:


    LlazarusLlong wrote:

    My tip for today is Carole's Spirit in the four o'clock, which I believe is the LGBT Handicap - which suggests you should do it each way.

    [Carole (Franizzi) is a much-missed quondam participant in these forums.]

    Wut?

    ...Dres

    See my edited post for additional context.

    I'd say "Wut" to that as well, sweety.

    ...Dres  (Espsecially since I don't know what the hell you're talking about.)

    P.S.  I'm rather drunk.


  9. Valashu Tizzy wrote:

    So...my Account is about 8 years old, will we be able to keep our names? Or do we all gain the "Resident" Name.

    Ebbe has stated that our names, friend list and money will all be transferable to the new platform.

     

     


    Valashu Tizzy wrote:

    Without decreasing the efford of the resident in sl, but i really would appreciate to let others see my actual SL age there.

    If it starts from 0 for everyone, it feels more like loosing something.

    What would you be loosing?  The new platform is not a continuation of SL... therefore, it makes little sense for your SL age to show up there.

     


    Valashu Tizzy wrote:

    I mean, i spend a lot of time in SL, i guess that should be rewarded.

    You're rewarded with the pleasure that spending all that time in SL has given you.

    ...Dres


  10. Darrius Gothly wrote:

    For some unknown reason you have responded to a good natured jab in the ribs (from me to LlLl) as though I was attacking him, or attacking humanity .. or attacking the forums .. or something. In short you've gone all defensive, combative and (honestly) over the top ..

    In response to a joke!

    LOL!!!  You say this as if I were actually being serious.

    ...Dres


  11. Darrius Gothly wrote:

    ROFL!! Good heavens Dres! Did someone drive over your prized petunias today or something?

    OMG... how'd you know?  You must have done it... you b!tch!

    As far as Llaz's statement, you've no idea what his intent was in stating his opposition to stupidity.  That would call for the knowledge of the operation of his mind, which I can only assume you do not possess.  I know that Llazy doesn't automatically consider every human to be stupid (I've know him for years now).  Do I understand what point you were trying to make?... of course.  Does that mean that your point is in any way accurate?... of course not.

    ...Dres


  12. Darrius Gothly wrote:


    LlazarusLlong wrote:

    {snip}

    [Apart from the bit which says you are not supposed to annoy anyone, which means that I could RIC the majority of posts ever made in the forums, because
    humanity
     annoys me.]

    FIFY!

    Are you kidding me?  Why on earth would you replace stupidity with humanity?  Do you honestly think all humans are stupid?

    ...Dres

×
×
  • Create New...