chmarr Walcott

this is simple, unless that person can provide HARD proof that he wrote the history of the shadow demon then he is telling outright lies. the first mention of the shadowdemon if i can remember was way back in the early 1920's in early horror movies and if i remember rightly in REAL history the shadow demon was mentioned in witch trils in the uk during the darkages. so this person who is claiming ownership / copyright of a mythical being which is technicly public domain, now if this person chages aspects of the shadowdemon lore which is nothing like the origonal then that person can then claim ownership BUT if it contains ANY of the origonal lore then he or she cannot have ownership / copyright. now i understand what nymph is talking about and i have been there and all i did was demand hard proof, the hard proof means a real world document or even a copyright number which can be legitly checked, if nothing can be provided then that person cannot claim ownership. also why are they trying to claim ownership of something that has no realwporld impact and then toss in the fact the world of darkness already have there own version of the shadow demon