Jump to content

Snugs McMasters

Resident
  • Posts

    754
  • Joined

Everything posted by Snugs McMasters

  1. ...places a watermelon on the stairs ahead of you
  2. It's not nice to talk about @Madelaine McMasters when she's not in the thread I'm sure Maddy appreciates your looking out for her, Katherine. However, as Rowan is one of her alts, she actually is in the thread. She's usually not so sloppy as to drop hints like that, but her hay fever has been acting up and she's high on Benadryl.
  3. Yeah, and there's no need for any of you to comment that I'm crap at it.
  4. There's no doubt in my mind that Maddy's an id. There is considerable doubt in her mind over whether I'm her ego. She is, at the moment, yelling "f-ing buzzkill superego" at me from downstairs. Nope, no doubt at all.
  5. Now you've done it. She's out on the porch, waving her cane and cursing your name at the turkey poults who are kicking her mulch onto the lawn.
  6. Hey I said on another thread I appreciated the spontaneous threads where we go off-topic, but this is going a bit too far! 😁😉 Look, I warned about squeezing Maddy. And how you're trying to do it in a thread discussing Coprophagy? I'm with Kiera, what the hell is wrong with you people?
  7. Not all, most. Some, like me, admit it. Some deny it. The most clever of us say things like… “I thought we were all @Madelaine McMasters alts.”
  8. NOOOOOOOO, don't do it, Rowan! She's full of sh*t.
  9. With the exception of @Dave23McMasters (who's a real mama's boy), nobody has a lower opinion of Maddy than her alts.
  10. Maddy tries to use her alts to back up her position in arguments.
  11. Must you give her ideas, Love?
  12. It does get tedious, doesn't it? No more tedious than her lame excuses.
  13. It's a grueling and thankless job, Silent. I do my best, but she's more nefarious than any of you can imagine.
  14. Let me remind everyone that Maddy's true self sets people on fire. Can there be a better argument for virtual reality?
  15. Doesn't this now bring up another question? What qualifies LL to be curator of any, much less ALL of the pages? Regarding group representation in SL, how would LL discern what it is? They don't know the identities of anyone without PIOF. How would they compile any kind of census? If they mine our behavior to determine how we present here, and focus PR efforts in some attempt to make SL "look" like RL, might that happen by inadvertent slight of hand, where residents pretend to be in the groups being promoted? Many of us have an "I take people here at face value" approach to SL. That's works pretty well when we think of this as a fantasy world. I'm not sure how well that weathers the encroachment of RL. I've been wondering what would happen if SL recaptured the world's interest and grew into a major social media player. Facebook and Google already have content moderation tools and teams in place that are getting a lot of attention from politicians and activist groups, both for not going far enough and for going too far. Imagine what might happen if Section 230 (the law that absolves platforms of responsibility for content posted by users) is revoked. Even with 230 still in effect, critics have been using the increased curation of content by platforms as evidence that they are indeed publishers, not platforms. If any responsibility that to LL as a result of their curation, or the demise of Section 230, do you think they might require at least some proof of our identities? If that happens, I imagine the the largest SL community will become... expats. ETA: For anyone that wonders. Snugs = Maddy and Maddy's incompetent.
  16. She's not kidding. I can't be in-world more than a few minutes before this happens...
  17. After both being booted, @Lindal Kidd and I went looking for the marvelous avi our friend @Maureen Boccaccio sported, without getting ejected... We bumped into each other at the store, looking very much like sisters...
  18. I was ejected seven seconds after arriving. The place hadn't even rezzed entirely.
×
×
  • Create New...