Jump to content

Genie Mixemup

Resident
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. That is why I mentioned that applied clothing layers to mesh bodies might require help for the body creators (where they so inclided) The HUDs for these bodies communicate with the mesh bodies on sub-channels and with certain commands. If you knew the right commands and channels you could make a device that listened to the relay channel for incomming strip commands and then relay them to the body layers. i.e. You get hit with an @remoutfit:shirt=force commaned, the device hear it and then sends a clear upper clothing layer 2 to you mesh body. unfortunately you'd have to code for each different body, so could only support the Mesh Bodies that felt like cooperating. Though I suppose if you could just make your own 'blank' applies you could force wear those as a means of stripping.
  2. I've been playing around with the idea of writing a HUD item that could help with this. The system that I am think of would require some folder set-up though and the larger problem would be that most RLV commands from self worn attachment (Like an OC Collor) are delivered though llOwnerSay. The HUD should work fine for RLV commands issued on the RLV Channel and mesh clothes, but I have not worked out anything for the other. p.s. also applied clothes on the mesh AVs built in clothes layers would not be doable without some cooperation from the creators. Buttons (Genie.Mixemup), owner of Genie Wishes
  3. Hello, I think you problem is in how you are calling the RLV restriction. RLV restrictions called though an llOwnerSay issue the commaned directly to your viewer (ie FireStorm, Phoenix etc) Those type of command do not use or even require a relay. If you want the relay to be used and for the safeword button to work try issuing the command threw a llSay on the relay channel instead of llOwnerSay. examples: llOwnerSay("@detach=n"); // not safewordable though your relay llSay(-1812221819,"NoRemove,"+(string) llGetOwner()+",@detach=n"); // safewordable though your relay I think the listener thing other where talking about would be if you wanted to build in a separate "safeword" that your script specifically listens and then would clear restrictions independent of your relay. ("@clear" for llOwnerSay restrictions, "!release" for llSay restriction) Hope that's of some help.
×
×
  • Create New...