Jump to content

Madelaine McMasters

Resident
  • Posts

    22,941
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by Madelaine McMasters

  1. What a load of BS! You’ve got working me over for donations down to a “fine art”, so my acts of kindness are not the least bit random. They’re programmed by you! To add insult to injury, I asked you to shut up about it and here you are blathering it all over the forums. Why oh why do I put up with you? Don’t say it, don’t you dare say it. Adorability is no damned excuse.
  2. You’ve misspelled moron. It’s spelled gee oh oh eff. ETA: it just occurred to me. Goof off becomes… Gee! Oh? Oh! Eff off!
  3. Though I love KT Tunstall's cover of "Tangled Up In Blue, I still think Bob does it best...
  4. Dillon's "little" music thread ended sometime in 2018, after more than seven years of sharing music across exactly 10,000 posts. LL's inability to imagine people like us resulted in that 10K post limit, causing the threads death. We kept it going for a little while longer by deleting older posts, but eventually that stopped working, too. Here's the last song posted to that thread... Dillon's last post to everyone in the thread, which approximately coincided with her leaving SL was... "I love you."
  5. Mom’s go-to threat when she was really in a mood was… ”I brought you into this world, I can take you right back out.” I never had difficulty telling if the mood was angry or silly. Friends did.
  6. I was thinking that, if actually eating your young was defensible, I'd give it a go on Mac. But, I'm both vegetarian and aware that I'm only here to discuss this today because it's not defensible. We're not actually related, but Mac did seem to fall from my tree... on his head, but still from my tree.
  7. Thanks for bringing that to my attention, Qie! Quotes of interest: "That model was suggested by Bernhard Riemann and developed by Hermann von Helmholtz and Erwin Schrödinger — all giants in mathematics and physics — and proving one of them wrong is pretty much the dream of a scientist.” I highlighted a concept that is foreign to those who think science is groupthink. “We might be able to think of it normally but with an added dampening or weighing function that pulls long distances in, making them shorter. But we can’t prove it yet.” That sure sounds like the logarithmic behavior of our photosensors, though that's so well understood that they must mean something else on top of that.
  8. Yep. My partner and I were fully cognizant of the screwy-ness our particular kink, had no explanation for it, and no expectation of finding one. We were simply happy to have found each other, so no explanations were necessary. We'd just look out at the rest of the world from our cozy perch and be thankful that, for our brief time together, we didn't have to fit into it. And, back to nibbling on our young, there actually is an explanation... https://www.bounty.com/baby-0-to-12-months/development/want-to-eat-your-babys-toes I can find potential, satisfying, explanations for a lot of kinky behavior, making screwy seem perfectly normal, or even supranormal.
  9. I remember Mark Kingdon beaming with pride over increasing new user signups from 20K to 30K/day. At the same time, concurrency was falling. If you know you're not keeping the customers who try your product, it makes no sense to bring in more. It makes even less sense to be happy about it. Retention is indeed the hard problem. Improve that before drawing in more people to discover you haven't improved that.
  10. In a metaphorical sense, I'll mostly agree. My recent, vanished partner was a near a perfect fit for my weird form of intimacy. Her joyful acceptance of that was the kind of spooning I wanted. I won't elevate that to "need" because I get along without it, but it comes pretty damn close.
  11. I didn't give birth to anyone, yet I've still got a kid. I can only imagine how painful childbirth is, but I KNOW how painful child rearing is. I got very excited yesterday when my tree guy informed me that he's got a new chipper that can handle 18" trunks. Mac will fit!
  12. I love seeing others hugging and cuddling, and I love being the cuddler. But the cuddled one? Not even on my death bed. Nature can be so screwy.
  13. No, TP direction compatibility is the sort of thing we knew to check before getting married. Having children wasn't. Oops.
  14. I learned that lesson from the experts, monkeys at the Milwaukee Country Zoo. I also learned that experts needn’t be smarter than me.
  15. Or which end of the sleeve of ice cream cones you open? My ex-hubby insisted on opening the “bottom” end, because you could easily grasp a cone to remove it from the sleeve. I insisted on opening the “top” because it was easy to tuck the plastic sleeve into the next cone when resealing. I’d insert my index and middle fingers into the cone and spread them to grip it for extraction. Easy peasy. Did I mention he’s my ex-hubby?
  16. I don’t mind hugging people who need it, I’m just not fond of being hugged. I don’t think I ever need it. It’s also an issue of control. I had 26 aunts and uncles, so hugs were unavoidable. Dad was the only person who could hug me or set me on his lap, and that only lasted for my first few years. We were a “no public displays of affection” family. We conveyed affection through absurd banter, filled with mock insults. Like you, I tolerate people who offer up hug animations. Unlike you, I set people on fire to show I care. ”…hugs you all up” riffs on the seemingly universal need for human mothers to eat their young, often starting with their toes. Who hasn’t heard a mother coo “I’m going to gobble you all up” to an infant, or something like it? I love the absurdity of that and have co-opted it for hugging. ETA: The paradoxical nature of my farewells should not surprise. You know how I love being paradoxical.
×
×
  • Create New...