Moondira
-
Posts
227 -
Joined
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Knowledge Base
Posts posted by Moondira
-
-
1 minute ago, Jordan Whitt said:
Other ID get put in time out again?
And seriously? Who brought the topic of paedophilia up? Who made the assertion that dictating to the paedophile that his behaviour is wrong...is wrong? How on earth is that a statement that should be defended????
Waiting to see if a new forum ID for that person will be showing up soon as that comment is one that seriously cannot be unseen or forgotten.
Jordan, as I explained, he brought that up as an extreme contrast so that Annie would comprehend that yes, indeed, we do have censorship. She was acting like there should be no censorship whatsoever. Now I can't say I agree with his choice of contrast, but none the less I understand why he used it in in an attempt to make his point.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Chris Nova said:
What is wrong with it? Ok, I will ask you if you are a pedophile sympathizer or one yourself because that is what that sentence screams. Do you understand?
Hmmmmm
-
6 minutes ago, Jordan Whitt said:
You mean nasty like you always are?
I've been here for hours...watching, reading, eye rolling. I just have had nothing to say...for once.
You are here insulting people who smoke, commenting on their smoker's breath, calling them stinky etc whilst hiding behind your forum alt ID. I'm not a smoker as I gave up many years ago, but I do not begrudge people the right to smoke if they want to. I do not demonize them for doing something that is still legal to do. I haven't got "smoke on the brain" nor have I been "group hypnotised". Sometimes people simply agree with each other.
Nope I wasn't, because I actually have Moondira and her alternate ID blocked. I just occasionally look at their posts and saw one addressing me.
Yes, I've been insulting. It was time. I came in to defend xLunaae and Ayeleon against all the insults hurled against them.
Really, scroll up. Even accusations of pedophelia.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, xLunaea said:
You're going to get upset at me by saying "victimized losers," when another guy just called someone "stupid" for their own opinion? Lol, yeah, okay. So uncalled for.
Precisely. The people who are not on your side feel justified to be as nasty as they want. But you defend yourself and all hell breaks loose and the blame is placed totally on you. Typical.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Jordan Whitt said:
I disagree with some of what you have posted here. I have not belittled nor used insults to get my points across. But going by your reply TO HIM, I am a "victimized loser" because you have lumped everyone disagreeing with your opinions into one big "bunch of victimized losers".
I think you need to scroll up a bit to see just how nasty this bunch has been Before you arrived on the scene
-
1
-
-
I gotta be free, I gotta be free. Who else can I be but who I am........
It's the American motto. Damn everyone else who has to breathe your stinking smoke.
-
1 minute ago, xLunaea said:
You're going to get upset at me by saying "victimized losers," when another guy just called someone "stupid" for their own opinion? Lol, yeah, okay. So uncalled for.
It's the smoke on the brain I tell ya. They can only see their side of things. Maybe group hypnosis. I just don't know.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Rowan Amore said:
But that's what sock puppets are for. You can despise bullying/name calling/ganging up on one but do the same thing on the other without repercussions.
Huh??
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, xLunaea said:
I was never bent out of shape. That's also what's so funny. I am being accused of something I'm not, by a bunch of victimized losers.
Keep getting "bent out of shape."
They gotta be freeeee 😅
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Sam1 Bellisserian said:
Ok that was just rude so I reported you.
Why didn't u report the woman in the Is this right for SL thread?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Sammy Huntsman said:
In better news, I had S'mores flavoured Ice Cream from Ben & Jerry's. It was Delicious, that and today is my first year anniversary with my partner
As someone said on another thread, nobody asked for your biography.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Oh noes, another stinky breath smoker!!!!
-
2 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:
I'm wearing an N95 mask. I put it on the moment you arrived for your protection but more so, for my own.
And you're welcome, again.
Now, regardless of how much I do so enjoy your witty(?) repartee, I'll leave you to wallow in it alone. Plus, I need a cigarette.
Your comeback is lacking. Please step away from those cig toxins.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Rowan Amore said:
https://www.drugs.com/illicit/psilocybin.html
There you go and you're welcome.
Thank U, but don't come too close. Smokers have stinky breath.
-
Just now, Jaylinbridges said:
Relax folks, and light up a joint. This thread has gone to pot...
I need something stronger.
-
1 minute ago, Sam1 Bellisserian said:
He was? and how do you know this? Sounds like to me that he didn't know why sex with children was illegal and wrong because I mean...long ago freeing slaves was illegal too.
Ask him why he used it. It's a common tactic to paint a contrast to prove a point .
-
2 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:
I read it somewhere so it must be true?
Maybe, but like so many other things in life, especially things that concern our heath & brains, the real answer is "it depends".
U have doubts after reading the thoughts of these smokers??
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Sammy Huntsman said:
I would say this response is laughable, as well the issue is. Kids can't consent to sexual acts. What in the absolute fudge is wrong with you? But why are you bringing up pedophilia, and slavery and smoking and saying that is comparable. That is disgusting to go that far.
He was bringing up an extreme instance so Annie would have to admit that we do have censorship as she seemed to believe nothing should or could thwart her desire to do as she pleased.
-
1
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:
Don't forget asking inane questions.
Oh I just thot it might be hurting due to looking up at all the points flying over your head.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, xLunaea said:
You and others cared enough to reply. If you didn't, you would have moved on a long time a go and this thread would have died. Instead, you choose to act like a bunch of victimized losers pointing fingers, rather than considering other people's perspectives. And you can't even see that, which is honestly hilarious. It shows just how "intelligent" most of you are. I think the term "special snowflake" needs to be re-introduced.
Calm down now, it's the smoke effects so we need to be gentle. 😄😄😄
-
1
-
-
Rowan, does your neck hurt?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Sam1 Bellisserian said:
Any intelligent person knows the answer to this and it is not necessary to discuss why it's wrong or against the law. It just isn't and doesn't belong here.
Smokey heads don't know. Too funny.
-
1
-
-
U have no idea do u? @Rowan Alpha
-
2
-
-
9 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:
Because it's against the law and that was just an inane question regardless. There are no laws about smoking in photographs. The laws were enacted to prevent smoking advertising and in 2009, expanded to include smokeless tobacco products. Still nothing against smoking in personal photography.
Why do u think it's against the law or is wrong?
-
1
-
Keep getting "bent out of shape."
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Smoking: Influencing vs Programmability
in General Discussion Forum
Posted · Edited by Moondira
Some analogies are ridiculous and some aren't. We would have to take each 1 and examine why that would be the case. He was not however making an analogy between a smoker and a pedophile. He was offering categories or instances when we do censor so that Annie could see that we do censor. By using an extreme or big contrast we can more easily see. However I think he went too much to the extreme, and 1 eventually learns on forums not to bring up sexual abuse As it can be very confusing And triggering for some.