I thought about that, but it really hurts to be banned just because of my new avatar type. I feel like there should be some rule set in that unless the avatar breaks the sims specific rules, you can't be biased about it. Because as I said, the old owners were completely fine as long as they werent childish or overly cartoonish. A few players had kemonos, even males. But these new owners didnt change the rules at all, they just consider all kemono types to be childish and cartoonish no matter what even if they aren't. I really love that place and it really upsets me that I was banned not for breaking a rule but just because I'm a kemono. Pay for the sim or not, there should be some justice about that right? Second life has a rule about child avatars in adult places, not types. I don't feel a sim owner should ban for type, more so for looks or if someone tries to agee playy.