brodiac90

12 random people whose average intelligence is already low, and half the popultion are lower than that, does not compare to an expert. In fact, decisions by committee can often be worse in a risk averse environment when sometimes you just need 1 sensibble person to go. Err no, this is obiously not a child avatar etc. In fact, if this thread and the main one have proven anything, it's that you don't want peers deciding this stuff.

It's why I said 'more likely,' but I agree context is key.

I agree but would also add 3 things. 1. Profile content including things like their profile picture, description, picks and groups. 2. How they talk and act. 3. The sorts of accessories they have or are wearing - children are more likely to be holding things like toys, teddy bears, games, candy and anything else usually associated with children.

Now I need to find odd socks to wear!

I use Lelutka Avalon. Shape really is the most important followed by the skin / hair etc.

Thank you, is there an in world group or is that just the title of the assembly? Also, I'm SLT+8, what time is PT?

When and where is the meeting?

I change outfits so often my SL Mom bought me my own washing machine. I don't use it though! Laundry is for grownups! I made her a number of coupons for Christmas, one of them was titlted Washy Wash. Pay attention to the date....

196 pages to go! We could have another plague(sic) award given out. No @Madi Melodious I'm not going to let you forget that 😂 😂😛

LL recently released examples of the modesty layers. Content is not yet available but hopefully now that creators know what is expected it will be forthcoming. There is an entire thread dedicated to this which recently got locked at 251 pages. As for Furry child avatars, LL has not stated what their position on them is but as many agreed in the thread, we don't see how it is possible for LL to ignore them.

Side one might be more contentious depending on how developed the avatar is. No need for the back one though.

I honestly feared they might be as drastic as shorts which would break way more content than they already do.

I must be a girl at heart then because my favourite activity is shopping and I have so many outfits it is unbelievable. I already said I agree the back part is uncessary, but I also stated I don't think LL are going to change their minds. Yes it's rubbish, and no, the kid communuity in general being deminished is not good for me.

LL didn't really address that with the latest FAQ so now I think it's more you can't remove it or else you're breaking TOS. If that weren't the case I would expect them to address it since large portion of the thread was dedicated to that topic.

These are the examples.

indeed, I would like to see creators make HUDs for modestly layers like any other form of clothing so we can have lots of designs and colours. As long as TOS is followed that should be possible.

You do raise some good points about older children. I'm not sure the back part is needed but I also can't see LL changing their mind. For the most part the examples of the modesty layers LL supplied are a lot better than I thought they were going to be. I think at some point you just kind of have to go.... this is as good as it's going to get and if you push any harder they might just say sod it.

I think it's more for teenage avatars since they still count as under 18 legally and are chilren in the eyes of the law.

I honestly don't see how the modesty layers need to be discussed anymore really. They are very reasonable and a lot better than I feared they would be in regards to breaking existing content. Identity issues in SL aren't really a thing in the sense you can present as a different gender / sex at any time. As I said earlier: If you're a boy one day then present as a boy: wear boy clothing, hair etc and make sure you're wearing at least the boy's modesty layer. If you're a girl another day, wear girl's clothing, hair etc and make sure you're wearing both the chest and undie layers. At no point should anyone be able to insist they don't need to wear the chest modesty layer if they are very visibly a girl with a defined chest area etc.

I agree and think LL have been very reasonable. The only content those modesty layers break are content that kid avatars shouldn't be wearing anyway.

Also can I just say that I was pleasantly surprised that LL didn't end up insisting boy's have a chest modesty layer. The FAQ also had quite a bit of reassurance so I'm glad we did discuss what we did since it's very obvious LL took into account what we said.

If one day they identify as a boy they wear boys clothes and the modesty layer appropriate for boys, and vise versa for girls. The only time it would be an issue is if someone insisted they were a boy and only wanted to wear a boy modesty layer while having a very clearly defined chest. In that circumstance, sorry no, TOS overrides any identity issues.

I think with the changes to TOS you're going to see less and less borederline cases, which when you think about it, is actually a good thing. It doesn't really matter that LL are not as focused on avatars that look say 16 or 17, you'll most likely find that sim owners on A sims will do the policing for them. People have already mentioned that happening in this thread. Nobody who isn't perverted wants anything to do with that sort of thing, adult and child avarars alike, so everyone is going to be a lot more cautious. Again, this is probably a good thing.

Not really, does the bear even know how to use a gun? Even if it does, the knife is still worse. As Alan Rickman's infamous Sheriff of Nottigham one said. "It'll hurt more." Second one, the first thing I thought of when I read the words lifelong celibrate were priest. Err no, I don't want to be anywhere near a priest as a little boy. The man wants to give me candy? Okay, think that one is self explanatory. Last one, both are really, really bad, but I'd wager I'd still be safer with the bear compared to the sort of man who wants to go out into the woods and dress up as a bear.

Blinks... still definitely the bear.