Morana

Thank you for bringing up this topic! This is a massive issue which is put under the rug for too long and it has a RL legal consequences. How are a no copy items merchants fully responsible party and their status as such put in the situation of No Right, while the buyer is the one who clicked the phishing file which then led to the fraud being committed. What happened with the legal and criminal responsibility of the one who is clicking the file. If I click anything on internet I am responsible for the consequences. With that being said I as an internet user have my rights protected according to the Law of the country the monetary traffic is allowed by. There are RL agencies who are dealing with cyber crime and me as a citizen of EU am to report such ongoing activities online. Simply put, it's rather questionable if it is legal to be a service who is charging RL monetary funds while not doing anything about cyber crime happening on it's venue. Also, the server provider is the one who is obligated by the RL law he registered his company under, to make an action in regulating attempts of a cyber crime ongoing ly happening. This is an activity of a cyber crime happening since May 2016. Wherever there are RL monetary funds involved, RL law abides as well. Simple. There's no such thing as a virtual currency which can be exchanged for the RL one, it is a RL money. RL money traffic is a subject to the Law. No company policy is above the Law, there's something called the hierarchy of laws.