MizzFuzzyMoran

Theresa Tennyson wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: Theresa Tennyson wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: this judgment seems to open the door to litigation against organizations that inaccurately use ip addresses to identify individuals for disciplinary maintenance and management purposes i understand allot of forums use ip bans and this ruling would put the forum admins and owners in the firing line from those who have been adversely affected by forum bans i can see allot of forums quietly undoing existing bans hoping those they have banned wont notice that they can access those sites again That case is about issuing a subpoena, which is a legal action that is meant to be served to a specific person. A forum IP ban is an attempt to mitigate a nuisance coming from a certain internet location - whether the nuisance is caused by one person or forty at that location doesn't mean vinegar to a rabbit. You'll just have to keep finding new ones... are you related to the corrupt turkish idiot theresa he used the same ineffectual blunderbuss of an approach to try to oppress the innocent he failed too Yeah, blunderbusses are notoriously inaccurate. Like the "ad avatarem attack in response to a legal point which you can't address" blunderbuss. so you dont subscribe to the belief that it is better that ninety-nine guilty men go free than one innocent man hang a forum ip ban which prevented a whole organization from participating because of one supposed annoyance would not find favour @perrie ll has deliberately settled several cases which have called into question its rights to terminate acounts unilaterally thus prejudicing the users ability to liquidate assets which is one of ebbes edge cases that the tos changes were intended to forestall although the draconian retrospective arrest of intellectual property is still to be tested and might yet be found wanting

Theresa Tennyson wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: this judgment seems to open the door to litigation against organizations that inaccurately use ip addresses to identify individuals for disciplinary maintenance and management purposes i understand allot of forums use ip bans and this ruling would put the forum admins and owners in the firing line from those who have been adversely affected by forum bans i can see allot of forums quietly undoing existing bans hoping those they have banned wont notice that they can access those sites again That case is about issuing a subpoena, which is a legal action that is meant to be served to a specific person. A forum IP ban is an attempt to mitigate a nuisance coming from a certain internet location - whether the nuisance is caused by one person or forty at that location doesn't mean vinegar to a rabbit. You'll just have to keep finding new ones... are you related to the corrupt turkish idiot theresa he used the same ineffectual blunderbuss of an approach to try to oppress the innocent he failed too

this is how ll should be marketing sl thanks to botgirl for the headsup

. . . the chicken ranch is

this is the key spec line NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M Graphics with 2048MB of dedicated video memory its an option so make sure your company dont get the basic model the machine is pretty much a monster with one big problem it will overheat as soon as you turn it on spend $35 on a multi-fan stand and all your problems are solved though

this judgment seems to open the door to litigation against organizations that inaccurately use ip addresses to identify individuals for disciplinary maintenance and management purposes i understand allot of forums use ip bans and this ruling would put the forum admins and owners in the firing line from those who have been adversely affected by forum bans i can see allot of forums quietly undoing existing bans hoping those they have banned wont notice that they can access those sites again

Perrie Juran wrote: thebaekai wrote: Lol and he has to get arrested to realize he was an Idiot? Does he realize it's not exactly the cells phones that cause it to be Illegal, it's because he's driving with something in his hands. Idiot. Driving with something in your hands is not illegal everywhere. how else could you steer and change gear

your getting old

. . . ebbe asked you to be a parttime linden helping out in a part of sl that was dedicated to a special interest of yours what name would you take i would be krish linden because i am originally from australia and used to be a very unsuccessful bush pilot

a really smart person called botgirl has already done a pretty good job of analyzing the interest groups of sl its three years old now but still relevant i love the term meetaverse thou i thought it was a typo to start

MizzKittenzz wrote: May I add, I get the feeling it's not even a "her", if it were then "she'd" know you cannot be 46wks pregnant whilst being due in a month... lol waht are you sum kinda online math teacher anyway its sexist to believe that men are too stupid to no how long pregnancy lasts i was calculating it in working weeks

thank you for understanding what i was saying thank you even more for agreeing

the terms of service are very simple ll can do whatever it likes in the web properties it owns you cant but in the real world you can do whatever you like as long as you can afford a lawyer

Coby Foden wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: i dont mean clothes that you wear i mean places wear to advertise (spellchecked) But you forgot: • capitalization checked and • punctuation checked :smileysurprised: Warning: This post has not been checked in any way. It may or may not contain multiple errors. :smileytongue: the spell checker dont help with hat (spellchecked)

Theresa Tennyson wrote: And what IS the correct meaning of "irony", Mizz Moran? im nothing like smart enough to be able to explain it to you is an example of verbal irony where the real underlying meaning conflicts with the apparent one with a dash of litotes thrown in for good measure

Perrie Juran wrote: Ayesha Askham wrote: Drake I don't know, this being an American website, whether irony is ever practiced, because I thought MissFuzzyMoran might have been using it in her response...I have been told that Americans don't "do" irony. It would be ironic if an American told you this. Or would it be? whether they are american or not most people dont know the correct meaning of irony and cant distinguish it from sarcasm or even simple mockery

LaskyaClaren wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: stories are sooooo 2013 but thats about five years ahead of lls marketing department at the moment Tell that to Upworthy. its peaked i nearly wrote piqued vine defines the net populations attention span in 2014 its not even this long

stories are sooooo 2013 but thats about five years ahead of lls marketing department at the moment or maybe 50 years if that bikinis and bozo ad is an example

Errsatz wrote: With the prolifration of interventions like this and their more widespread use by individuals to circumvent intrusion and harvesting, what hope does any web based marketing strategy really have? I spend my leisure time in a range of forums astroturfing on behalf of various charitable causes extremely sucessfully- although over the last few years lls own attempts to use the technique have been risibly transparent, or maybe thats what ebbe meant anyway ll is targeting those who are not smart enough even to use adblocker

Drake1 Nightfire wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: Drake1 Nightfire wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: Drake1 Nightfire wrote: I think they mean to wear SL t-shirts in RL... like "I have a SecondLife, do you?" plastered on your RL shirt.. If LL is wiling to make them and send them to us users.. I would wear it. i don't mean clothes that you wear i mean places wear to advertise You don't see the SL ads all over the web? my point is that the same ads are all over the web not different ads for focused interest groups in the specific places where they go (spellchecked) FIFY. So, why should LL pay for various groups to have ads all over the web? If you want your group advertised on the web, buy some ads. i am not talking about specific named groups inside sl that you join i am talking about specific identifiable and targetable interest groups - in the real world - like furries goreans dressmakers cobblers bdsmers kids or people that want to be robots not just people that want to wear bikinis all the year round even though they live in alaska

Venus Petrov wrote: Will you please do us a favor and click Spell Check before you post? ok

Drake1 Nightfire wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: Drake1 Nightfire wrote: I think they mean to wear SL t-shirts in RL... like "I have a SecondLife, do you?" plastered on your RL shirt.. If LL is wiling to make them and send them to us users.. I would wear it. i don't mean clothes that you wear i mean places wear to advertise You don't see the SL ads all over the web? my point is that the same ads are all over the web not different ads for focused interest groups in the specific places wear they go (spellchecked)

Drake1 Nightfire wrote: I think they mean to wear SL t-shirts in RL... like "I have a SecondLife, do you?" plastered on your RL shirt.. If LL is wiling to make them and send them to us users.. I would wear it. i dont mean clothes that you wear i mean places wear to advertise (spellchecked)

jwenting wrote: would get very quiet if a lot of people start running around wearing adfarms. Which is what you're suggesting, a way to get around the ban on adfarms by having avatars pop in on regions wearing tons of advertising as clothing and attachments. Which will lead to a flood of ARs and simowners en masse deciding to ban all such activity. And rightly so. sorry jwenting you seem to have missed the point completely I am talking about ll advertising to people in the real world to get them to visit sl (spellchecked)