MizzFuzzyMoran

Theresa Tennyson wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: Theresa Tennyson wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: this judgment seems to open the door to litigation against organizations that inaccurately use ip addresses to identify individuals for disciplinary maintenance and management purposes i understand allot of forums use ip bans and this ruling would put the forum admins and owners in the firing line from those who have been adversely affected by forum bans i can see allot of forums quietly undoing existing bans hoping those they have banned wont notice that they can access those sites again That case is about issuing a subpoena, which is a legal action that is meant to be served to a specific person. A forum IP ban is an attempt to mitigate a nuisance coming from a certain internet location - whether the nuisance is caused by one person or forty at that location doesn't mean vinegar to a rabbit. You'll just have to keep finding new ones... are you related to the corrupt turkish idiot theresa he used the same ineffectual blunderbuss of an approach to try to oppress the innocent he failed too Yeah, blunderbusses are notoriously inaccurate. Like the "ad avatarem attack in response to a legal point which you can't address" blunderbuss. so you dont subscribe to the belief that it is better that ninety-nine guilty men go free than one innocent man hang a forum ip ban which prevented a whole organization from participating because of one supposed annoyance would not find favour @perrie ll has deliberately settled several cases which have called into question its rights to terminate acounts unilaterally thus prejudicing the users ability to liquidate assets which is one of ebbes edge cases that the tos changes were intended to forestall although the draconian retrospective arrest of intellectual property is still to be tested and might yet be found wanting

Theresa Tennyson wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: this judgment seems to open the door to litigation against organizations that inaccurately use ip addresses to identify individuals for disciplinary maintenance and management purposes i understand allot of forums use ip bans and this ruling would put the forum admins and owners in the firing line from those who have been adversely affected by forum bans i can see allot of forums quietly undoing existing bans hoping those they have banned wont notice that they can access those sites again That case is about issuing a subpoena, which is a legal action that is meant to be served to a specific person. A forum IP ban is an attempt to mitigate a nuisance coming from a certain internet location - whether the nuisance is caused by one person or forty at that location doesn't mean vinegar to a rabbit. You'll just have to keep finding new ones... are you related to the corrupt turkish idiot theresa he used the same ineffectual blunderbuss of an approach to try to oppress the innocent he failed too

this is how ll should be marketing sl thanks to botgirl for the headsup

. . . the chicken ranch is

this is the key spec line NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M Graphics with 2048MB of dedicated video memory its an option so make sure your company dont get the basic model the machine is pretty much a monster with one big problem it will overheat as soon as you turn it on spend $35 on a multi-fan stand and all your problems are solved though

this judgment seems to open the door to litigation against organizations that inaccurately use ip addresses to identify individuals for disciplinary maintenance and management purposes i understand allot of forums use ip bans and this ruling would put the forum admins and owners in the firing line from those who have been adversely affected by forum bans i can see allot of forums quietly undoing existing bans hoping those they have banned wont notice that they can access those sites again

Perrie Juran wrote: thebaekai wrote: Lol and he has to get arrested to realize he was an Idiot? Does he realize it's not exactly the cells phones that cause it to be Illegal, it's because he's driving with something in his hands. Idiot. Driving with something in your hands is not illegal everywhere. how else could you steer and change gear

your getting old

. . . ebbe asked you to be a parttime linden helping out in a part of sl that was dedicated to a special interest of yours what name would you take i would be krish linden because i am originally from australia and used to be a very unsuccessful bush pilot

a really smart person called botgirl has already done a pretty good job of analyzing the interest groups of sl its three years old now but still relevant i love the term meetaverse thou i thought it was a typo to start

MizzKittenzz wrote: May I add, I get the feeling it's not even a "her", if it were then "she'd" know you cannot be 46wks pregnant whilst being due in a month... lol waht are you sum kinda online math teacher anyway its sexist to believe that men are too stupid to no how long pregnancy lasts i was calculating it in working weeks

thank you for understanding what i was saying thank you even more for agreeing

the terms of service are very simple ll can do whatever it likes in the web properties it owns you cant but in the real world you can do whatever you like as long as you can afford a lawyer

Coby Foden wrote: MizzFuzzyMoran wrote: i dont mean clothes that you wear i mean places wear to advertise (spellchecked) But you forgot: • capitalization checked and • punctuation checked :smileysurprised: Warning: This post has not been checked in any way. It may or may not contain multiple errors. :smileytongue: the spell checker dont help with hat (spellchecked)

Theresa Tennyson wrote: And what IS the correct meaning of "irony", Mizz Moran? im nothing like smart enough to be able to explain it to you is an example of verbal irony where the real underlying meaning conflicts with the apparent one with a dash of litotes thrown in for good measure