Jump to content

RudolphFarquhar

Resident
  • Posts

    355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Sephina Frostbite wrote: RudolphFarquhar wrote: Sephina Frostbite wrote: Its called context clues. Doesn't take a genius to understand her. Yes she might have a few words off but its not horribly written. If I want to make sense of a mystery I'll read a Sherlock Holmes story. In the forums I expect posters to make some sort of attempt to avoid insulting others with errors that force you to have to guess what might be the correct meaning of the words. She says she has been banned from multiple sims inworld - well, I'm not surprised, as her posts suggest that she has severe communications (inwards and outwards) failings of which she is blithely unaware, refuses to accept, and refuses to take action to correct. Your own posts suggest that you might have some degree of comprehension, but your continuing errors in presenting your views (it's it's not its) minimise the extent to which you might have credibility; you apparently care so little about your readers that you are reluctant to take the time to use freely available tools to correct what even you must acknowledge is a poor standard of written English. **********Rudi********** It would be rather childish of me to argue with someone who also makes errors in his post so I am choosing not to. I know the difference between them. I just didn't at the apostrophe in. Like you do sometimes. Happy Holidays Or Merry Christmas if you do celebrate. .. For example: You misspelled MINIMIZE.. Its not Minimise.. But I am not going to harp on you about it. After all you are superior right? LOL You talk ******** and don't realise it. That's realise - like minimise - with an "s" not a "z" because (and that's because with an "s" not a "z" as well) the word has a Latin, rather than a Greek root, and Latin had no "z" other than for loan-words (think the diacritical transformation of foreign words in English, like naive) which is a subject that even the OED gets wrong, so you and the rest of the USA are in good company - but it doesn't make me wrong. Neither does my apparent inconsistency in apostrophising its as it's from time to time because it's a different ******* word!!! You are in no position whatsoever to make any sort of accurate criticism of my English, and that you do so is evidence of your own ignorance. Please continue to do so, and humiliate yourself further in the eyes of the more literate of the participants here, while also drawing out those semi-literates in your support so we can laugh at them too. **********Rudi**********
  2. Magic Dres! At this season I would also like to point out that "good will to all men" is not a sexist comment and in fact, is a misquotation of Luke 2: 1-14 which actually says: "peace to men of good will". So, as is usual in the bible, mean people are specifically excluded from passing through the eye of a needle - another mistranslation, of course. It's just as well my exhortation regarding scepticism in believing what you read online can be quite beneficially extended to include the bible, the koran and several other players to be nominated later. **********Rudi**********
  3. Unswervingly. **********Rudi**********
  4. Sephina Frostbite wrote: Its called context clues. Doesn't take a genius to understand her. Yes she might have a few words off but its not horribly written. If I want to make sense of a mystery I'll read a Sherlock Holmes story. In the forums I expect posters to make some sort of attempt to avoid insulting others with errors that force you to have to guess what might be the correct meaning of the words. She says she has been banned from multiple sims inworld - well, I'm not surprised, as her posts suggest that she has severe communications (inwards and outwards) failings of which she is blithely unaware, refuses to accept, and refuses to take action to correct. Your own posts suggest that you might have some degree of comprehension, but your continuing errors in presenting your views (it's it's not its) minimise the extent to which you might have credibility; you apparently care so little about your readers that you are reluctant to take the time to use freely available tools to correct what even you must acknowledge is a poor standard of written English. **********Rudi**********
  5. "Your"? "Devert"? "Nosense"? Who's the fool? **********Rudi**********
  6. Perrie Juran wrote: You may think that, but you have said it like a Martian. **********Rudi********** Hey, leave us out of this. Our communication skills are not THAT bad. Oooops, I meant to say, like A Martin. That's Anthony Martin, who was bottom of my kindergarten class. **********Rudi**********
  7. Sephina Frostbite wrote: What you wrote is very clear. You see, my contention is proved; Sephina has demonstrated at length that she doesn't have the first clue, so if SHE understands you then you must be completely incoherent. **********Rudi**********
  8. Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: I can read and type English fine, Why don't you then? Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: that has been made clear. Where? Or as you might type it: Were? Or perhaps: Wear? Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: And you yourself know that to be true. Hmmm, your psychic powers are, I am afraid, not working very well today. Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: You can make up as many things as you want. Luckily, since I am actually watching a very important football match, I don't need to; your incompetence is clearly evident. Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: And flat out lie like you have now, to avoid the fact that I am correct. Erm, as I have pointed out, your English is appalling; your opinions might have some substance if they were expressed in a coherent manner, but as it is, it's impossible to tell. Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: It won't change anything. Are you referring to your misguided and risible insistence that you are making sense? Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: What I say is grounded in fact. You may think that, but you have said it like a Martian. **********Rudi********** ETA I think your performance in this thread explains why you have been "wrongfully banned" from so many sims . . .
  9. Nagumi Yazimoto wrote: The fact is, many of these posts where meant to offend TC. This goes along with the "I am an A-hole or the B word" ETC nonsense that is trendy among people online. It just involves them going out the way to offend insult someone because they are "brutality honest" (only online, of course). There where posters that that stated the issue with celebrity avis in world without pretending to be someone they are not however, and it's their statements that should matter. If, as appears more than likely, your comprehension of English is as abysmal as your writing of it, then your opinion is less than worthless. You probably can't tell the difference between an insult and a compliment, and sarcasm will be completely wasted on you. I am surprised you spend any time participating in English language forums, as they must be confusing and annoying to you, particularly when your ignorance becomes the focus of discussion, as now, when you have raised the subject. **********Rudi**********
  10. Tex Monday wrote: RudolphFarquhar wrote: I have no particular evil plans for 2014. I thought I'd just continue being as ******* pleasant as I have been in 2013. **********Rudi********** An excellent idea..and with that you will continue to gain the respect and admiration of your peers....whomever those people may be.... I have no ******* peers. **********Rudi**********
  11. I have no particular evil plans for 2014. I thought I'd just continue being as ******* pleasant as I have been in 2013. **********Rudi**********
  12. georginamae1992 wrote: I am an Art Student, and writing my dissertation about how the avatar (particularly in SL) can be considered artwork, both in its design and in its performative nature. If you have any thoughts about this idea I would be really grateful to hear them! Thanks Of course an avatar can be considered artwork. But then, 99.99% of artwork is ******* ****. **********Rudi**********
  13. Anjevia wrote: Perrie Juran wrote: RudolphFarquhar wrote: Perrie Juran wrote: Well, didn't the UK give us Boy George? At least he could sing without the aural equivalent of photoshopping. **********Rudi********** True. I know I'd rather listen to Mogan Freeman talk me through masturbation than hearing Taylor Swift sing. So I'm guessing Boy George wouldn't be out of the question either? :smileylol: For either/all genders. Depending upon how good your eyesight - and memory - was. **********Rudi**********
  14. But Griffin dahling, it is, it is! **********Rudi**********
×
×
  • Create New...