Jump to content

wesleytron

Resident
  • Posts

    249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wesleytron

  1. 4 minutes ago, KennyChidorie said:

    In this case, I understood you and will continue to move on

    I just mean don't worry about it anymore, and don't worry about what might happen next or what the motives of the reviewer were. And don't let one bad review put you off Second Life!

    • Like 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, KennyChidorie said:

    By scammers, I mean people who blackmail. Let's say I asked one person why he left a bad review, that buyer wrote that if I give him an expensive item that he likes, he will change the review to 5 stars. But most of the other cases were about trying to cheat on lindens.

    You're not being very clear about what your current issue is. Or you're over thinking it.

    You've reported the inappropriate review, the best thing now is to just move on.

  3. 2 minutes ago, KennyChidorie said:

    Thanks, that's what I did. This review was written by someone we haven't contacted.

    Then you've done everything you need to do. Just wait now and if LL agree that it's not an appropriate review then it will be removed and you don't have to worry.

  4. 18 minutes ago, KennyChidorie said:

    Today I decided to check if there are any new reviews for my products and saw this.

    Oh I see. Basically somebody gave you a bad review.

    If the review is not appropriate to the product, then just use the channels available to report it to Linden Lab to have it removed.

    Edit: and you just posted to say that's what you've done.

  5. @KennyChidorieAre you basically trying to find out if someone else has been logging in on your account? If you're worried they have, the first thing you should do is change your password before they do.

    There isn't, at least as far as I am aware, any specific feature which lists all log-ins to your account.

    I think the nearest we have to such a thing is the files in our chat logs. Those should be date stamped with the last time you logged in, but they might be of no help at all if the other person is logging in on a different computer. Those chat logs and files will be saved on their computer.

     

     

  6. On 3/21/2021 at 8:54 AM, JoJo Aurelia said:

    A newer body is offering a fix on their hud for butt suck and bewbies clinging with BOM. resolving one main gripe about BOM Clothing.

    I thought most of the existing bodies were already doing this one way or the other.

    • Like 1
  7. 17 hours ago, Wili Clip said:

    My fishing game is not a copy of any of above and is very different.

    Is it different in the way that Google+ was like, totally different to Facebook? Google+ had "circles" while Facebook has "friends"

    Or in the way McDowell's is nothing like McDonald's? McDonald’s has the golden arches, McDowell’s has the golden arcs. McDonald’s has the Big Mac, but McDowell’s has the Big Mick. Totally different.

    mcdowells-restaurant-comingtoamerica-700

    • Haha 2
  8. On 2/23/2021 at 3:09 PM, Arielle Popstar said:

    One of the Lindens saw me as naked from 3 meters away.  My clothes only became visible when they cammed in closer. Glitches still happen!

    That sounds more like bad LOD. To test it, set your LOD to 1.125 (the default) and zoom out three metres. If your clothes disappear, my unsolicited advice is to make a note of the creator and don't buy from them again! It's bad design, not a glitch.

  9. On 7/3/2020 at 1:07 PM, Marianne Little said:

    New feet that can be made smaller. I hope there will be many shoes rigged to use the feature. Now I can really make low avatars, since my personal preference is that the static feet looked big under a certain height.

    Foot size can only be adjusted horizontally, not vertically. Perfect for flat feet, but far from perfect for high feet. Your height won't change.

  10. 1 hour ago, Drayke Newall said:

    I am more fearful of it actually just being put on life support to milk whilst they split the real money maker away from a dead horse that has been beaten one to many times.

    SL is a dead horse which has been beaten one too many times but these new investors will just put it on life support?

    So SL is damned either way!

  11. 8 minutes ago, Lewis Luminos said:

    If they stop releasing more homes that will be a good indication that they are doing nothing more than keeping the grid in tick-over mode until they can offload it to someone else.

    I don't think it would mean that at all. At some point they are going to stop adding more homes. That was most likely always going to be the case, acquisition or no acquisition. It was never going to continue indefinitely. Just because that project reaches its conclusion isn't in itself a sign to be worried about SL's future.

    • Like 1
  12. 8 minutes ago, Alwin Alcott said:

    not sure why you'r here in that case,  go inworld wait till the news reaches you, or any other that isn't interested, but i already hear the whining rise... "boohooo i didn't know it and now i'm too late... when was that changed ...." ..

    I'm here because I took an active interest. I'm not talking about me. I'm not whinging about anything. I'm making an objective point.

  13. 2 minutes ago, Alwin Alcott said:

    if they want to know? .

    If they want to know what?

    How can they know that they want to know if they don't know about it? Why should they be interested in the first place?

    Probably most people don't take an ACTIVE interest in all the latest SL developments. And why should they? They just want log in and enjoy their time in SL. However, like many people, they may find they DO take an interest if they PASSIVELY encounter it.

    "I've got a great new product - but I'm not going to make the effort to promote it to you - I'm just going to rely on you wanting to know about it. Even though you don't know about it."

    You're asking people to take an active interest in something that they have no reason to take an active interest in.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...