Jump to content

Stefanosje Sellers

Resident
  • Content Count

    122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Stefanosje Sellers

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Ahh sorry. I misinterpreted "mailing list". In that case, you're right. My mistake!
  2. Not really. The institutes that deal with these EU-laws are designed to allow easy complaint filing, considering that consumers must be helped easily in order to fight these kind of things. As simple as writing an e-mail. They'll get blacklisted from receiving servers and at some volume of complaints the institute itself will take legal route. I'd say, file a complaint and them mute them. Help the next person out who they would've adressed next.
  3. As I work with e-mailpolicy IRL, I can confirm this is against the law in Europe. I don't know about USA. All e-mails must be subscribed to by an opt-in + confirmation from the e-mailaddress. By any means you can take down the merchant via EU-laws. Not by TOS but by e-mailcode.
  4. SL has been my home for quite a while. 2.759 days to be exact. I count them, not because I hate SL, but because I love it. I've been developing as a programmer for most of my time. And a while ago, I was introduced by a friend to Gaia Clary's awesome tutorials on rigging mesh. I started practicing 3D modelling more and more. We aim to create quality products, that are of high standard and put a smile to a residents face when they have been twitching to buy that -slightly out of budget- product they so eagerly found. We sell various post-apocalypt decorations and complete mesh avatars. This is
  5. Sassy Romano wrote: /me glares and spanks... Maybe not that the group hug didn't work out, we can try a guillotine?
  6. Drake1 Nightfire wrote: Stefanosje Sellers wrote: Drake1 Nightfire wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: That's quite a witch hunt you're on, Drake. I think you've placed yourself at a disadvantage though, by shooting yourself in the foot with the Blunderbuss of Hypocrisy™. You cast unfounded aspersions at Stefanosje and then turn around and complain when you think a little Martian has tossed one at you. That's the kind of whining we've come to expect from the back seat on long road trips. I equated him to someone hanging around a playground and taking pictures without permission.
  7. Drake1 Nightfire wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: That's quite a witch hunt you're on, Drake. I think you've placed yourself at a disadvantage though, by shooting yourself in the foot with the Blunderbuss of Hypocrisy™. You cast unfounded aspersions at Stefanosje and then turn around and complain when you think a little Martian has tossed one at you. That's the kind of whining we've come to expect from the back seat on long road trips. I equated him to someone hanging around a playground and taking pictures without permission. Never once did i call him a child perv. Those were not m
  8. I have no history nor relationship to child perversion. This was an upmost cheapshot comparison that is wrong from the core: photographing subjects whom voluntarily visit adult events that allow photography (whom are age verified by the way), is worlds apart from sneaking pictures of children whom are unaware of it and underage. What the F is wrong with you?
  9. Coby Foden wrote: Stefanosje Sellers wrote: Anyways to get to my question: lately I have been receiving multiple threats and warrants, with the demand I take their avatars pictures down. The threats include destroying my business, IRL lawsuits and what not. For the benefit of those drama queens we need a new feature in SL. Naturally the permission to de-render the box would cost - let's say 500 L$. :smileyvery-happy: LOL! Very tempted to send them this box as a gift using Marketplace. That was a very much needed giggle.
  10. Madelaine McMasters wrote: Thank heavens there are people who wander around taking photographs of other people... http://www.vivianmaier.com I imagine the vast majority of folks who do so are not pervs. I've got a friend who does it from kites. It's a form of art. I could've posted them naked as well, but I kept it decently..
  11. Madelaine McMasters wrote: (b) Avatar Consent for Machinima For machinima, you must have the consent of all Residents whose avatars or Second Life names are featured or recognizable in the machinima. This includes avatars who are featured in a shot, avatars whose names are legible, and avatars whose appearance is sufficiently distinctive that they are recognizable by members of the Second Life community. Consent is not required if an avatar is not recognizable and is merely part of a crowd scene or shown in a fleeting background. Consent is not required for any snapshots. That sorta sa
  12. Drake1 Nightfire wrote: Stefanosje Sellers wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: Sassy Romano wrote: You should point then at that ToS section and ask them to point out which bit they feel you are in breach of. Or you could just tell them that they are "talking out of their arse" Pick one of the above, both work. For maximum effect, Stefanosje could tell them he's going to photograph them talking out of their arse. That'll show 'em! ON POINT! Hahahahaha. Chuckled. On a serious note though. I do respect their point of view, just their approach is wrong and if they are so p
  13. Perrie Juran wrote: This is not the first time I have heard of insanity like this. I'd be tempted to take and post even more pictures of this person. But we know you don't want the idiocy to escalate. Some people take privacy to insane limits. The minute any one steps into the line of sight of another person they have surrendered their privacy. You've done nothing wrong here. If someone doesn't like that LL has given us the ability to take snap shots which also includes the (gasp) danger of having our picture taken what they should do is Log Out and go hide in a closet. Lmao!
  14. Marigold Devin wrote: Stefanosje Sellers wrote: And the story entails with slander: "Learn manners. I will be putting a warning in my picks regarding your lack of respect for people trying to enjoy their sl. The fact that you are such a huge **bleep**ing **bleep**, tormenting others with no regard for the issues they are struggling with in rl speaka volumes about your character. Your actions have violated my second life." I have now pretty much told her that if she will continue to slander me, I will post her full name on Flickr with a justificating description about how I'm not wr
×
×
  • Create New...