Jump to content

Wendy Nitely

Resident
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wendy Nitely

  1. I'm running Norton 360 Windows defender knows this and allows Norton to control all the application security. Funny thing is I added animhacker to the trusted list and it still won't execute. So I guess I'll have to find another way. I know I cant take my BVH into Blender Avastar, convert it to an anim and change it's priority there, but i't just a bother to do it that way. Thank for looking into it!
  2. Fault #2 Faulting application name: CHXSmartScreen.exe, version: 10.0.19041.423, time stamp: 0x0431d1e3 Faulting module name: KERNELBASE.dll, version: 10.0.19041.1826, time stamp: 0x299341e8 Exception code: 0x88985004 Fault offset: 0x000000000010fb62 Faulting process id: 0x13678 Faulting application start time: 0x01d89d4df44468fb Faulting application path: C:\WINDOWS\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.AppRep.ChxApp_cw5n1h2txyewy\CHXSmartScreen.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNELBASE.dll Report Id: f88e66e4-36c1-4a25-b82b-6b353beb4930 Faulting package full name: Microsoft.Windows.Apprep.ChxApp_1000.19041.1023.0_neutral_neutral_cw5n1h2txyewy Faulting package-relative application ID: App
  3. I set the antivirus to "trust" the app. There are 2 messages #1 Fault bucket 1346192947968145127, type 5 Event Name: MoAppCrash Response: Not available Cab Id: 0 Problem signature: P1: Microsoft.Windows.Apprep.ChxApp_1000.19041.1023.0_neutral_neutral_cw5n1h2txyewy P2: praid:App P3: 10.0.19041.423 P4: 0431d1e3 P5: KERNELBASE.dll P6: 10.0.19041.1826 P7: 299341e8 P8: 88985004 P9: 000000000010fb62 P10: Attached files: \\?\C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1D92.tmp.dmp \\?\C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1E2F.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml \\?\C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1E40.tmp.xml \\?\C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1E3E.tmp.csv \\?\C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1E7D.tmp.txt These files may be available here: \\?\C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportArchive\AppCrash_Microsoft.Window_835c3496ff22d4e663b43e1baed26e5918c06423_81189fd8_30ffc175-0903-4431-8a34-e8e03e7990dd Analysis symbol: Rechecking for solution: 0 Report Id: f88e66e4-36c1-4a25-b82b-6b353beb4930 Report Status: 268435456 Hashed bucket: ba910c2fe60c669332aea35a8ec6f6e7 Cab Guid: 0
  4. Version 0.5 doesnt launch for me on my Windows 10 64bit machine. I havent tried an earlier version.
  5. ChinRey wrote: Wendi Nitely wrote: For me, using the same search, today... I got 822 on the beta with or without quotes around "medieval stable". On the old searc I got 46 using quotes and 793 without quotes. That is interesting. Seems they've forgotten about multiple word strings for the new search engine. I really hope they catch that before he new search becomes official. A fundamental blunder like that would be seriously embarrasing for LL and the Commerce Team. I suppose you searched the entire MP, those figures look rather similar to mine for that and it's interestign to see that the new search gave more, not fewer results, for that. Not sure what means though. That's Correct
  6. Or maybe, like I think Snickers may have suggested, have to be a premium member to list on MP...?
  7. "More than anything search can do to clean up and improve the Marketplace experience, simply having a mechanism that discourages flood sales of the same item would do it." Multiple listings of essentially the same product is against the TOS and is reportable by users of the SLM, though you are correct in that it doesn't stop people from doing it, and shoppers seldom report it. An I totally agree that the same item in dozens of different textures, while not technically against the TOS, should be disallowed. Personally I am against listing fees, LL already take their share. But I do see your point...
  8. For me, using the same search, today... I got 822 on the beta with or without quotes around "medieval stable". On the old searc I got 46 using quotes and 793 without quotes. The significant thing is, the 822 items in the new search much more closely matched what I'd expect to find from either of the results of the old search.
  9. I prefer real-time shadows. When we consider who is going to be able to see them, we have to consider how our long our builds might last and how they will be viewed in the (not so distant) future. PCs get faster (and cheaper), Internet access speeds get better and our builds will be living (we hope) for a long time.
×
×
  • Create New...