Jump to content

baby Kranfel

Resident
  • Posts

    124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by baby Kranfel

  1. All the "wut" answers from the "helpers" seems to prove a pretty big point with respect to the topic. I would have thought they would set an example for others. Maybe they are.

    Starting to look like a "Helper" gang bang ol.

     

    This thread doesn't look like it will last long, which might be the plan.

  2. Not using the feeds myself but knowing them, it seems all you are interested in is having them as a SL resource for social interaction without grief. This is a rather straight forward point that I think would benefit all concerned.

    I find it rather secondary to waste time try to play a guess me game of who has posted, the logic speaks for itself.

     

  3. The pools filling up it seems. I really don't understand why this post can cause so much uneasiness among some. I like the topic and the direction, for those that use the tool it is not odd that they would like to enjoy it without interference, just because.

    Don't you think?

  4. Since the statement was not clarified by the poster I will take based on action as being "private business" once disclosed is open for everything from everyone. Harassment, slander, belittling, and whatever else suits the general public.

    Well since they what to own everything, does that include "everything? I'm asking so I can't really answer you.

  5. There was posted in another thread that "PS In a public forum where someone writes their 'business' -- it then becomes public business; it does not belong to just them anymore."

    Everything has checks and balances, the above mentality would not last in RL (liable is legal action), it would not last her in SLF because the mods would apply the ToS to correct it and the poster, but it does happen in the feeds because no rules apply.

    I wonder that if I was inflected with say diabetes would the same person be willing to share with me?

    Knowing something does not give license to ridicule, does it.

  6. Not to sure why you find the need to question everything but reading back through here is enough of a character reference, you should try it.

    Now kindly go about your own business, if you have any :)


    Griffin Ceawlin wrote:


    baby Kranfel wrote:

    Nah this "Pep"  doesn't seem to fit too much anger or worship around him.

    I thought you didn't know who Pep was?



  7. Well have to disagree. I mean "Jeffery Dahmer" had a lot of press and most would not class him a celebrity. So based on that alone (there are many more examples) having ones name in print is not necessarily a good thing.

    How about contribution to SL or achievements to the community or just having ones name spoken without a bad taste in the mouth.

    Nah this "Pep"  doesn't seem to fit too much anger or worship around him.

×
×
  • Create New...