Luena Sangria

I would love to share the details of my story, but I want to save it for court. This is not a case of "psychological pressure" - I'm not a crybaby type, I've dealt with griefers of all kinds. This was something different and more horrific. But when the whole story is revealed I think people would understand what I'm talking about, what they were getting at etc. While it comes nowhere near to explaining what happened to me (since RL crimes were involved in my case), imagine for a moment that many of the people you knew in SL were using any information gained from you (not just your personal details, since these monsters already had those) to construct specific harassment against you both in SL and RL. My questions have to do with the following - legal jurisdiction for harassment and experimentation, I understand that people who haven't gone through the h*** I was put through in SL might confuse this for some jerks griefing me. It was not that.

I am curious as to whether LL has a contract. I don't think this was random. I complained to SL several times via several avenues. I also found something odd - when I connected to SL with a reverse firewall, my SL voice was not connecting to LL - it was trying to connect to some other IP. The LL employee who attended this said that it was not a security glitch and rather that it was connecting to the IPs of the ppl on my SL. This sounded like a hoax. I then used an avatar with no friends added and the same thing happened. I suppose that just like "port scanners" can try to get to computers through IM programs, they can do this through SL too. I don't want to say too much about my case, I would love to see it in court one day.

People's insults aside - I am getting at something that you are bringing up - that is, whose law is in place? I have enough material to demonstrate that: 1) it is connected to RL harassment; 2) the "harassers" (experimenters) knew who I was priior to my entering SL; 3) the hacking was definitely connected to the harassment; 4) the tactics used were not limited to simple harassment - I've been *killed* in SL before by griefers and I didn't go to the police - I told them off and muted them- I am talking about something far more sinister including psychological priming. If all of us are in California when we are in SL, is California law what takes precedent? Otherwise if the laws of each place a person is physically in takes precedent, serious harassment (not stupid griefing) on SL constitutes a Federal crime (crossing state lines to stalk) rather than a California stalking crime, presuming the experimenters weren't all writing from the state I was in. Since I moved states during this time, my assessment is that it is Federal jurisdiction. If the persons are in different countries, I suppose it is also Federal in each place. Believe me, if I had the means I would sue and that way all these legal issues could get resolved and I could get due compensation for my victimization.

I'm not paranoid. Usually "paranoid people" don't have *evidence* I use X Netstat Professional. It actually lists the name of the router my internet is going through. I have the ethernet plugged in - it's not on wireless and viola! The routers - there were two alternating shifts - were not the house router and one of them was from a different router brand. I would call that "rerouting" the internet. Printscreens of this happening constantly and more useful diagnostics points to a "rerouted" internet. Perhaps you have a better name for what this is called? When I use a reverse firewall along with this I can see I am connected to LL, but my internet is being "routed" through a router that we don't actually have at the house. Welcome to America.

Hi - I had some really bad experiences with my first main avatar a couple years ago or so. At first they were doing this weird stalking thing but eventually I came to realize that it was more along the lines of psychological priming of various types, psychological harassment techniques and gathering information. Unfortunately a lot of this ran to RL where I finally got a case # at the State Attorney's Office. Their stonewalling appears to be indicative of something - they have not investigated the SL part, they haven't even stopped the "harassers" from rerouting my internet at home, etc. I was wondering if anyone out there might have had a similar experience with involuntary research? There are very specific guidelines for experimental psychology and what I was put through is not something that would ever pass through an IRB. I presume, but am not sure, that whoever is behind this has to abide by California law if the experimentation is done on SL. Any information that someone could provide would be very useful. If there was other experimentation that involved: more than minimal risks (eg extreme harassment) and was nonconsensual, I would love to hear about it and be in touch since there is something that can be done about this. Thanks in advance.