KMJP Enyo

I have a question witch i find need to be thought about. Where do we stand as a purchaser on secondlife? As opposed to the seller For example: If you purchase a product if it is transferable you are most likely to get a refund for any defects or issues with the product. What if the product as marked on marketplace was listed under the Copy & Transfer filter because thats the product type you wanted for any specific reason, but upon delivery from market place after being opened and the contents was only copy. This to me is the sellers fault and there for must take responsibility due to missleading product, but where do you draw the line between them where they stand and where we stand as buyers. Because its copyable there less likely to give you your money back and because you can not give them the product back you have been misslead into purchaseing the product, maybe not onpurpose. Should not the designer or selling user then provide you with what he has promised or stated upon the market place description. I mean people purchase lindens with real life money, and in real life if you go to a store where im from if a product is listed under the wrong price tag the store has to sell you it at that price weather it be more or be less. So in this area should not that apply to a market place selling product in all formats aswell with what its listed under? It comes across to me threw out secondlife its the purchasers that get stiffed most of the time in a purchase that was not listed under the correct categorys, Described correctly, listed with the correct permissions, and if there is any problems with the product weather it be copy or not loose out on lindens due to somthing that was not there fault. Where do we both stand as a seller or a buyer? I just havent got my head around this yet and responces KMJP Enyo 

I have a question witch i find need to be thought about. Where do we stand as a purchaser on secondlife? As opposed to the seller For example: If you purchase a product if it is transferable you are most likely to get a refund for any defects or issues with the product. What if the product as marked on marketplace was listed under the Copy & Transfer filter because thats the product type you wanted for any specific reason, but upon delivery from market place after being opened and the contents was only copy. This to me is the sellers fault and there for must take responsibility due to missleading product, but where do you draw the line between them where they stand and where we stand as buyers. Because its copyable there less likely to give you your money back and because you can not give them the product back you have been misslead into purchaseing the product, maybe not onpurpose. Should not the designer or selling user then provide you with what he has promised or stated upon the market place description. I mean people purchase lindens with real life money, and in real life if you go to a store where im from if a product is listed under the wrong price tag the store has to sell you it at that price weather it be more or be less. So in this area should not that apply to a market place selling product in all formats aswell with what its listed under? It comes across to me threw out secondlife its the purchasers that get stiffed most of the time in a purchase that was not listed under the correct categorys, Described correctly, listed with the correct permissions, and if there is any problems with the product weather it be copy or not loose out on lindens due to somthing that was not there fault. Where do we both stand as a seller or a buyer? I just havent got my head around this yet and responces KMJP Enyo