Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/19/2018 in all areas

  1. 11 points
    Whew.... shopping, shopping, shopping is exhausting....
  2. 10 points
  3. 9 points
  4. 9 points
    Trying to furnish my new apartment, although so far all I've done is stare at the wall for 3 hours.
  5. 9 points
    ...sends you a li'l bag of replacement buttons.
  6. 9 points
    With [noctis], Bliensen+MaiTai, Endless Pain Tattoos @ We<3RP ~ .:Soul:. 25% off new release
  7. 8 points
    Ahoy, Mateys !! Here's your cheat sheet for today's conversations:
  8. 8 points
  9. 8 points
    AWSOME! I discovered my Halloween outfit! The Floating Head With Hair of Fire! Pictured visiting my fav place to trance out, End Of Days Gothic Club:) WITH BUNNY EARS, OF COURSE:) ~S
  10. 8 points
  11. 8 points
    from the other day.. am I the only that be posting pics days afer?
  12. 7 points
  13. 7 points
    Then walk on by. Phil has every right to state his personal opinion on a GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUM. He has every right to sell his products with whatever perms he wishes. The only reason this thread is going on is because people keep trying to tell him he is wrong. How can he be wrong? You might prefer other perms that's fine. Just because you don't agree you start name calling. If you don't want NO COPY don't buy NO COPY. That doesn't change the fact that a merchant can sell it if they want.
  14. 7 points
  15. 6 points
  16. 5 points
  17. 4 points
    The irony is, that, if we had such a system like the OP describes, instead of threads complaining about being booted or banned, we would have threads complaining about the unfair combat system.
  18. 4 points
    Yarr! Hide the rum and ye pool floaties! We be sailin' in to the Hangout this fine day! Boat belongs to Cap'n Orwar! No funny business or ye be walkin' tha plank!
  19. 4 points
    While the problem itself is almost certainly the thin walls, the physics view may have added confusion here (sowwy). That said the OP is not clear on this as they state it did not work with either analysed or non-analysed. It may be related to using the OS version as @ChinRey suggests, perhaps the OP can explain. I will explain why physics view in this case might have added to the confusion if not checked thoroughly. If the mesh had not been analysed, then the physics would not allow an avatar to pass through, the physics display, however, should have shown this clearly (and looked something like the third image posted by the OP (even though that was showing "forced convex hull" so no surprise it was filled. Expanding the mesh to >0.5 would have worked fine and displayed correctly (in FS) in physics view. This is because I fixed the bug that caused it not to. Unfortunately, in in fixing that bug I opened up a separate use case where the analysed meshes do not show correctly under 0.5m. In this situation, however, the mesh itself is passable so most people don't notice the bug because they don't need the physics view to test something that works!! TL;DR There's a bug in my physics view in FS. I'm busy working out how to fix it at the moment. The essence of the problem is that in the code there is a function that tells the viewer what type of physics is being used. It is in that function that the code looks at the user selected shape (convex hull/prim/none) as well as the dimensions of the object, to see if it is going to be forced to be convex due to thinness. There is no data available inside that function to allow it to distinguish whether the object in question has a mesh or hull physics and so, by making it behave right for one case, it went wrong for the other. ? I am working on providing the additional information into that function now so that it can make the right decision. Hopefully, I'll get it into the next release RL permitting. Not sure whether this bug applied to this circumstance, but it would have confused the debugging potentially. I raised a Jira against myself to track this https://jira.phoenixviewer.com/browse/FIRE-23053
  20. 4 points
    if you two don't stop fighting soon Jagix will lock us out of the thread again... Conspiracy theory: is hardcore derailing the new way to prevent necroposting as the lab won't close threads otherwise?
  21. 4 points
  22. 4 points
    not the topic ..got any store names? no? then bye ? ... is mildly amused that people in 2018 don't understand how forums work, and therefore invite demonstrations.
  23. 4 points
    We haven't even started and she's already fussing ----___----
  24. 4 points
    Happy Tuesday All! This day in history fun fact a new book was published three years ago on this date: It was 100 blank pages! ?
  25. 4 points
    chatting at the Hangout. You meet so many nice and interesting people on the forums.