Jump to content

PG Anthro Skins: Indecent?


MuffinUnsane1488303563
 Share

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 3871 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

I've been questioning something lately and I thought it would be nice to get some feedback on it.

What are the views on clothing-less furries wandering around in a PG skin? Would it still be considered indecent? Or fine?

I started thinking about this as I was working on an avatar. I felt the avatar worked better without clothing(due to colors) but worried that it would upset people if I wandered onto a moderate or even a general sim.

Since I know many avatars now come with PG skin I thought it would be nice to see what others thought.

 

Cheers :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are official starter Furry AVs with that sort of skin: fur-only and no clothes. Some people are going to get worked-up over it, regardless, but there is a clear precedent set by Linden Lab for that sort of skin being OK.

Anyway, nobody fusses about not getting clothes included with a human skin.

PG Skin is an OK label, but it might be worth a word or two of description, pointing to cartoon examples (Bugs Bunny and Yogi Bear come to mind), and reffing to the Linden Lab examples 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 3871 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...