PG Anthro Skins: Indecent?

[MuffinUnsane1488303563]

I've been questioning something lately and I thought it would be nice to get some feedback on it.

What are the views on clothing-less furries wandering around in a PG skin? Would it still be considered indecent? Or fine?

I started thinking about this as I was working on an avatar. I felt the avatar worked better without clothing(due to colors) but worried that it would upset people if I wandered onto a moderate or even a general sim.

Since I know many avatars now come with PG skin I thought it would be nice to see what others thought.

 

Cheers :)

[Amethyst Jetaime]

As long as you don't have any overt pubic areas showing such as genitals or nipples, i see nothing wrong with it.  After all RL animals don't wear clothes and no one complains.  Furries are furry and to me all fur is clothes for an animal. 

[WolfBaginski Bearsfoot]

There are official starter Furry AVs with that sort of skin: fur-only and no clothes. Some people are going to get worked-up over it, regardless, but there is a clear precedent set by Linden Lab for that sort of skin being OK.

Anyway, nobody fusses about not getting clothes included with a human skin.

PG Skin is an OK label, but it might be worth a word or two of description, pointing to cartoon examples (Bugs Bunny and Yogi Bear come to mind), and reffing to the Linden Lab examples 

[MuffinUnsane1488303563]

I didn't know about the new furry LL avatars. : o

 

Thanks for the posts all~ I just didn't want to be risking getting my tush kicked out somewhere because it was General. I understand that someone will always have a problem but I wanted to know how much of a majority it was.