# Land Impact Game

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 3194 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

## Recommended Posts

The game is about guessing the LI of a mesh object you see on a picture. Someone posts a picture of a mesh. Others can guess what the landimpact is of the object. The first one who guesses the right LI is the one who posts a new picture of a mesh. It must be a mesh made by yourself.

I will start with one that is not too hard to guess, I guess

##### Share on other sites
• Replies 65
• Created

Great bag! Love the details.

I will start the guessing at 1 LIs. =D

Nope

##### Share on other sites

It could be a trick!

Maybe there is a really complex geodesic sphere in the bag?

I guess 476

##### Share on other sites

ill take a guess at 23 LI

##### Share on other sites

I would have to see an angle shot to see how much detail is in the texture vs the shape.  That said, with careful texturing, I could see doing that in 8LI or so. ()

On the other hand... My low detail stuff generally rides around 0.50LI... I lurves my linksets. =^-^=

##### Share on other sites

That is a very nice purse. I won't participate, but I've written the answer down and will be watching.

I do like the answer "476". If Madeliefste was new to this, I think that might be close.

Charlar

##### Share on other sites

Other shot, other texture as well

Hint: 476 is not close

##### Share on other sites

It's not fair unless you tell us how big it is. :matte-motes-frown:

##### Share on other sites

It has the size of normal womans handbag.  x = 0.13, y = 0.26, z = 0,38

But good idea for a new rule in the game, Drongle. Add the size of the object to the picture when it's your turn to post.

##### Share on other sites

I think it should be 1, but as that;s taken, I'll say 2. :matte-motes-smile:

##### Share on other sites

It has the size of normal womans handbag.  x = 0.13, y = 0.26, z = 0,38

But good idea for a new rule in the game, Drongle. Add the size of the object to the picture when it's your turn to post.

What is "normal" though? my wife's handbag seems to be able to accommodate at least 50% of all the matter on planet earth. :smileywink:

My serious guesstimate is 4

2

##### Share on other sites

Hmm what about posting a wireframe shot (not from SL) I can subdivide a cube and make you guess all week A wireframe guessing game will be much more educational Just a suggestion My guess is .... 11

p.s Nice idea

##### Share on other sites

Nice idea, and a fun diversion :matte-motes-smile:

Hmm... I'll hazard a guesstimate at.... 3. The little round spheres on the top and the clasp closure might hog a few more triangles than the overall main mesh volume. However, this cost is entirely dependent on the LODs.

So yah, I'll try 3

##### Share on other sites

Maeve, well done! It is 3. It is your turn to post.

##### Share on other sites

How about posting the wireframe after the right guess?

##### Share on other sites

Thanks Madeliefste! And nice mesh btw! :matte-motes-smile:

Okies... Since I have been talking a bit lately about my extremely savage LODs workflow, I guess I should post an example here. Anyone who has been reading my posts or has visited my build (which is unlinked currently) will probably already have a good idea of the LI range.

So... here it is... three interior room modules, with my ultra savage LODs applied. They are designed as interior only rooms, so won't be visible from outside when their LODs change. Only the interior wall surfaces and doorways are modeled (NO floors or ceilings - JUST the wall segments). Each room is a separate mesh - the three are linked together, so there is the the benefit of combined fractional LI's to reduce the cost slightly. No exterior faces... ONLY the inner sides of each wall (the INSIDES of the rooms) are modeled (due to the modular nature of this build). Each room mesh has the full 8 materials assigned, as well as UVs.

Total volume of the three meshes LINKED inworld is 23m x 15.5m x 7.5m high.

Phew, I think that's about all I need to state (typing this fast, as RL duties call LOL).

So... guess the LI of the COMBINED Linkset. :matte-motes-smile:

EDITED TO ADD: In my haste, I forgot to mention that each mesh room has its own functioning physics hull (for the walls and doorways).

##### Share on other sites

I'm saying 26.:matte-motes-big-grin-squint:

##### Share on other sites

Uhh hard to guess

Single sided, and with the walkthroughs ...

Each of them has less verts then an ordinaery cube.

Hmm ill go with an LI of 3

##### Share on other sites

Medhue: Sorry, you're waaaay out of the ballpark!  :matte-motes-shocked:  :matte-motes-wink:

Dain: Hmmm, you are incredibly close with your estimate! Not quite on the mark, but almost!  :matte-motes-smile:

Oh, and I forgot to mention that each of the room meshes has functioning physics for the walls and doorways (though the LI for the physics hulls doesn't push the overall LI for each module any higher, for what it's worth).

##### Share on other sites

Maeve, I'm not going to guess... good additional info on the lower LoDs, without them it's nearly impossible to take a good guess. But since you're on the superlowprim path, here's something you could do to lower the count some more.

I see you have built your walls in a "column-wall-column-wall" kind of way. The seperate walls aren't needed are they? Just make one long wall with a texture repeat, it will cost you a tiny bit in texture efficiency, but only the parts covered by the columns. You can also make a compromise and use two pieces of wall like you are, but push the edges together and merging the vertices. This will save you two vertices each time (2 less than the one wall) and will make you able to show the entire texture.

btw you aren't going to cheat the thread by altering the build and keep people guessing forever?

##### Share on other sites
• so... 8 materials per object you write. That means additional vertices from the UV-maps
• And from your LOD description i guess you have only used the first 2 LOD and set all others extremely low ?
• then there are 3 parts
• Overall very few vertices for the entire build
• But huge

I can not decide between 2 and 4

ok, if you use physics, i say 4. If you do not use physics i say 2.

: I just saw you use physics, so i say 4

##### Share on other sites

Kwakkelde: Yah, the columns are an aesthetic choice on my part. Since the overall LI for each room module is pretty low, I am happy to have a little bit of additional geometry for visual detail etc. The columns are a mixture of practical and artistic choice: By having the wall segments in blocks as they are, I can allocate multiple material zones, which allows a bit of texture and/or diffuse colour variation (currently I only have a couple of placeholder textures applied).

Plus the overall build I am working on re-uses these mesh pieces over and over again throughout in a modular fashion (the wall panels, the columns, doorways etc - all these pieces have been UV-mapped prior (along with other pieces in the build) and then I have been using these pieces to assemble each room module etc (which are then saved out as single meshes for SL)... via the use of materials, I can split them up into relevant UV sets and so on. A balancing act, between texture efficiency in the final build and overall LI, and artistic choice.

Oh, and altering the build....? Hmm... thanks for the idea! :smileyvery-happy:  :matte-motes-smile:

........................

Gaia: (You posted while I was replying to Kwakkelde)... I'll give it to you on your initial guess.

IT WAS 2. (Unlinked, the meshes are 3, but with rounding of LI decimals, the LINKSET is 2). The physics cost is surprisingly low, although I guess the large size of the flat surfaces may be a deciding factor in this (the two smaller room modules were only about 0.5LI in the uploader (WITH physics hulls), so when linked together with the larger room module, the decimal rounding saves 1 LI - a nice bonus.

Your turn now Gaia :matte-motes-smile:

##### Share on other sites

I wasn't talking about getting rid of any columns... Just merging the walls "through" them. I understand the texture variation... You won't get it any lower than 2 anyway, with three pieces. Nice low poly build!

Oh edit on the compomise I described in my earlier post..that won't work, it would require seperate UV islands...

#### Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

### Announcements

×
×
• Create New...